Home > General > Best and Worst MPG... |
|
|
stu Member Since: 04 May 2011 Location: Richmond North Yorkshire Posts: 927 |
my best/worst figures according to the trip computer are:
|
||
27th Oct 2012 5:40pm |
|
crookedm Member Since: 23 Sep 2012 Location: Heswall Posts: 698 |
Best 27.8 from Devon to Wirral.
|
||
28th Oct 2012 5:05pm |
|
Mikeyjd Member Since: 14 Jun 2011 Location: Wrexham Posts: 543 |
My long term average is about 24-25.
|
||
29th Oct 2012 11:12am |
|
Herdwick Member Since: 05 May 2010 Location: Lake District, Cumbria. Posts: 36 |
Since getting our Westminster in May, it has averaged 31,7mpg over 9k miles, mainly motorway to/from S of France 3 times.
|
||
29th Oct 2012 5:19pm |
|
Dolphinboy Member Since: 07 Dec 2009 Location: Bristol Posts: 3130 |
2004 4.4v8 (BMW)
|
||
29th Oct 2012 6:36pm |
|
marcoos_1 Member Since: 25 Oct 2012 Location: Glasgow Posts: 138 |
Well......I've just bought my TD6.......and I'm really dissapointed with the power vs fuel economy. I've still got my P38 4.6 with LPG. It is faster, smoother, cheaper to run.......
|
||
30th Oct 2012 7:11am |
|
LPG Member Since: 20 Nov 2012 Location: Kent Posts: 15 |
Had my 2009 3.6 TDV8 a week now and its averaging 16.9mpg. It is only getting used for short journeys (2-3 miles) so I wasn't expecting it to be ecomonical, but I was hoping for around 22mpg.
|
||
23rd Nov 2012 10:16am |
|
stan Site Moderator Member Since: 13 Jul 2010 Location: a moderate moderated moderator moderating moderately in moderation Posts: 35248 |
i'd leave it a bit longer than a week to get a 'proper' average...do some longer runs in it and that average should go up...a remap wont affect the mpg that much if you're only doing short runs.. ... - .- -.
|
||
23rd Nov 2012 10:51am |
|
bozmandb9 Member Since: 06 Dec 2010 Location: Wallingford, Oxfordshire Posts: 1020 |
I think you'd be lucky to get 22 mpg on a 2-3 mile journey! The engine is not even going to warm up properly in that time. Remember it's a 3.6 litre diesel V8 lump, it's never going to be terribly efficient for really short runs. I'd maybe forget about the remap if they're claiming they can give you such an improvement over such short journeys. Plus, if you only do such short journeys it'll take you donkeys years to recover the cost of the remap in fuel savings! Range Rover-less at the moment - Pining! |
||
23rd Nov 2012 11:01am |
|
Arenaitch Member Since: 27 Aug 2012 Location: Twixt Scummers and Skates Posts: 69 |
Just an observation guys, but the OBC on my 2012 Westminster is consistently over 15% optimistic on average fuel consumption compared to real-life measurements, so the 28mpg I see actually translates to around 23mpg at the pumps.
|
||
23rd Nov 2012 11:39am |
|
crookedm Member Since: 23 Sep 2012 Location: Heswall Posts: 698 |
Agree, I get fuel consumption overall of 25 my trip consumption is 23.9. Save the remap money drive it like to fear you will ill someone if you go over 70 these aren't meant to be driven like sports cars. It's not brilliant but look at it, it's owns the road! |
||
23rd Nov 2012 9:32pm |
|
barracuda816 Member Since: 11 Jun 2012 Location: oxfordshire Posts: 213 |
Real world, im getting 25mpg. The TD6 seems to be under quite a lot of strain in the ff, i live in an area with a fair few hills. Should have got the v8 |
||
23rd Nov 2012 10:31pm |
|
rathbranV8 Member Since: 23 Jan 2011 Location: meath Posts: 283 |
2002 4.4 v8 on 114750 miles
|
||
26th Nov 2012 12:36am |
|
steptoe Member Since: 23 Jul 2012 Location: london Posts: 382 |
2002 4.2 V8. With LPG
|
||
27th Nov 2012 9:48am |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis