![]() | Home > General (L405) > L322 to L405 - Any regrets? |
![]() ![]() |
|
|
Aeroresh Member Since: 31 May 2008 Location: North Wales Posts: 137 ![]() ![]() |
Nope, after 3 l322s both diesel and SC, I can honestly say the 405 is in a different league |
||
![]() |
|
Cam-Tech-Craig Member Since: 03 Aug 2011 Location: Gloucestershire Posts: 16311 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The jump in used prices between say a 2012 L322 & a 2012 L405 does not IMHO give enough of a benefit...
|
||
![]() |
|
5.0 Member Since: 25 Feb 2012 Location: Surrey Posts: 718 ![]() ![]() |
The handling is a quantum leap over the L322. It now drives like a car rather than a gallion in a gale and this alone would be worth the extra money for me. One can now drive fast on all roads if need be rather than just in a straight line. Braking is also significantly better. Paint finish and build quality is of a higher standard than the L322 but it is still not fault free. Drive them back to back and the L322 both looks and feels old now.
|
||
![]() |
|
modbarra Member Since: 28 Mar 2009 Location: northampton Posts: 237 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Difference feels same as when changed from TD5 Disco to a FFRR years ago..... |
||
![]() |
|
pld118 Member Since: 25 Mar 2013 Location: Bairns Posts: 4218 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Constructive replies from all, thanks very much.
|
||
![]() |
|
5.0 Member Since: 25 Feb 2012 Location: Surrey Posts: 718 ![]() ![]() |
Must have - active suspension
|
||
![]() |
|
modbarra Member Since: 28 Mar 2009 Location: northampton Posts: 237 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Personal choice.. Originally ordered vogue se with options... Inc Panoramic roof, Then due to Dealer going back on deal, and by changing dealer , managed to get Autobiography with V8.. Although think all look better with priv glass, the rear windows look to small without... |
||
![]() |
|
stenh02 Member Since: 30 Jan 2011 Location: Somewhere not warm Posts: 341 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Erm, against popular opinion....we chopped our L405 for a D4. I still run a 3.6 L322 which has more character than the L405. Lovely car but no soul in my opinion. Loved the deployable steps didn't like the smaller feeling boot, pressing two buttons to get the heated seats on. Small things but enough to have no emotional connection to it. Had the D4 3 months now and no regrets. But I've come from Series III, 90's, 110's, D2, D3 before the 4.4TDV8 we had before the L405.
|
||
![]() |
|
verydisco Member Since: 10 Dec 2009 Location: UK/US Posts: 2952 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
+1 on Active Suspension and Petrol ![]() Then +1 on everything stenh02 just said above. ![]() Current RANGE ROVER Vogue 4.4L SDV8 - 2013 - Indus Silver, on Almond. RANGE ROVER Vogue 4.4L V8 - 2002 - ex-2003 G4 Challenge Event Vehicle, Stage 3: Australia RANGE ROVER HSE 4.4L V8 - 2004 - one-of-one Overfinch RANGE ROVER P38a 4.0L V8 - 1999 - ex-2000 TReK Event Vehicle: South Africa Previous: RANGE ROVER Vogue 4.4L TDV8 - 2012 - RANGE ROVER 3.6L TDV8 x3 - RANGE ROVER Td6 x1 - RANGE ROVER Classic 3.5L V8 x1 |
||
![]() |
|
RR2008HSE Member Since: 06 Jan 2013 Location: British Columbia Posts: 2932 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Very interesting thread. ![]() How is the L405 more fragile? I was hoping KLR would be moving in the opposite direction. (Mind you, it'll be a few years before L405s reach a price where I'll need to worry about this... ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Cam-Tech-Craig Member Since: 03 Aug 2011 Location: Gloucestershire Posts: 16311 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I personally think A, they are built to a whole different pedestrian safety criteria so are VERY flimsy front end wise... We have seen 5 or 6 tap the front end at approx 5mph writing off the front ends instantly! Not really good enough on a capable off road vehicle! B, the quality of the fixings used are poor! Most times you remove covers etc the clips snap off! Just small (ish) things but relevant!
|
||
![]() |
|
Scottyav Member Since: 11 Feb 2013 Location: Cannock Staffordshire Posts: 1204 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Plus 405 ALL look the same no individuality like you can make a 322, all plastic looking and no shape like the older, yes they drive nice but I don't want a sheep looking car like all the others, I parked by a few over the weekend and had so many comments on her look and immaculate es and unusual look so there you go it makes me smile and when parked I could look at her for ages and it still looks better outside than any new 405 so that'll do for me! |
||
![]() |
|
CEEGEE Member Since: 20 Mar 2013 Location: Yorkshire Posts: 685 ![]() ![]() |
But lets be honest, the 405 does make the 322 look very old fashioned (in a civilised sort of a way) by comparison - which I suppose is no surprise given that its a piece of design that's circa 15 years old.
|
||
![]() |
|
Pixelpower Member Since: 16 Jul 2014 Location: Droitwich Posts: 204 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Can't roll the back seats forward. Heated seats are a faff to switch on. No sunglasses holder, smaller-ish boot. Visibility not as good out back, worsened by tints. Other than that, great -really enjoying it. Fast enough, ride is like floating. 30+ mpg, quiet. Wished I'd gone for the signature audio, other than that no regrets. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
![](../images/layout/footer/disclaimer.gif)