Home > General (L405) > Early v late L405. |
|
|
Dolphinboy Member Since: 07 Dec 2009 Location: Bristol Posts: 3137 |
from comments previously on here, 2017 models are a sweet spot as a lot of issues were fixed (front suspension etc.) |
||
2nd Jun 2024 8:20am |
|
Seatown Member Since: 30 Oct 2020 Location: Mountains, seaside Posts: 90 |
A couple that spring to mind:
|
||
2nd Jun 2024 2:29pm |
|
mjdronfield Member Since: 04 Nov 2011 Location: Derbyshire Posts: 7793 |
Which ones have the ad blu thing? Is that to be avoided (if you are looking around that’s introductory year) due to extra potential oil dilution?
|
||
2nd Jun 2024 3:05pm |
|
ABAB Member Since: 02 Feb 2017 Location: GB Posts: 281 |
Adblu MY16 onwards 2016 SDV8 AB |
||
2nd Jun 2024 6:45pm |
|
Sundayjumper Member Since: 15 May 2024 Location: Berkshire Posts: 13 |
I'd guess mainly because one of them is four years newer ? The 2017 will likely depreciate £10k over the next four years and be worth roughly what the 2013 is now. ULEZ is a thing. Euro 6 compliance will attract a significant premium anywhere near London as it'll save £12.50 per day if you live or work inside the zone - that's a worst case of £4,562.50 pa. Even if you don't need to worry about ULEZ, Euro 6 gets you a slightly lower VED band, and then as mentioned above, from 1st April 2017 it all went totally stupid and now (once they're 5 years old) a FFRR pays the same VED as a Prius hybrid contradicting what we'd been told since 2001 that it's about taxing the polluter (which tbf, did have some logic). |
||
4th Jun 2024 7:30pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis