Advertise on fullfatrr.com »

Home > Technical (L322) > Help me out with the suspension on my 'famous' 4.4TDV8 L322!
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 30 123 ... 282930>
Print this entire topic · 
LandyManSam



Member Since: 10 Jul 2019
Location: Wild West Ireland
Posts: 51

Ireland 2012 Range Rover Vogue TDV8 Santorini Black
Help me out with the suspension on my 'famous' 4.4TDV8 L322!

It's not really a famous L322 - but you might have seen my videos recently on YouTube. (https://youtu.be/iJP5RwEriyc)

If you have, you'll know that I've been having a few suspension related issues with her. Namely;

* The ride quality is nowhere near as good as it should be (particularly over small imperfections - over large undulations it seems 'OK') - it crashes over potholes and generally feels very unsettled unless you're on a perfectly smooth road.
* Secondly - the ride height seems to slowly go out of calibration over a period of a few days/weeks. Despite me recalibrating it multiple times, the front end seems to gradually raise, giving the car a 'leaned back' stance.

I'm getting to the point where I've tried pretty much everything I can think of to sort said issues, so I am hoping the collective brain of the FFRR can point me in the right direction. I need to give you all the back story so you can fully understand where I'm at now. Here goes;

The car is 2011 '61' plate 4.4 TDV8 Vogue with 191,000 miles on her, and was purchased in December of last year as the 'cheapest 4.4 TDV8 in the UK' from "Cars With No Reserve Reading" on eBay - as a bit of a running project. Before purchasing, I took the opportunity to test drive the car, whereupon it drove pretty nicely. I say "pretty nicely", because there was a slight knock from a front suspension component over potholes. Apart from that though, it drove and rode what I thought was exceptionally well for a car with its mileage. In fact, I was quite surprised by it - and on that basis I agreed to buy it. I discovered after buying it that it had *two* fully stamped service books, all from the same LR dealer in Sussex. Win!

Part of the agreement I had with the dealer was for him to MOT the car before I collected it. They did so, whereupon it failed the MOT on the following counts;

    Repair immediately (major defects):
    Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn rear arm (5.3.4 (a) (i))
    Offside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (1.1.11 (c))
    Nearside Rear Shock absorbers has a serious fluid leak (5.3.2 (b))
    Repair as soon as possible (minor defects):
    Nearside Front Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
    Monitor and repair if necessary (advisories):
    Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge both (5.2.3 (e))
    Offside Rear Shock absorbers light misting of oil or has limited damping effect (5.3.2 (b))



As the deal was for the car to be supplied with 12 months MOT, the dealer duly fixed the major defects and retested it. The O/S/F lower/rear arm was replaced, the brake pipes were sorted and they fitted a new rear damper on the N/S. The damper they fitted was a Bilstein LR023580 (44-139872) which, although not a genuine part, is the correct damper for this model with the adaptive damping / VDS. The car was then retested and it passed with just the advisories shown above remaining.

A couple of days after this, the garage called to say the Rangie wouldn't be delivered on the agreed date, as the air suspension had 'gone down' overnight. "Fine" I said - I am aware of Range Rovers and their air suspension foibles, so I was glad that they were taking the time to fix the fault. Anyway, they said they thought it was being caused by a leaky air spring - so they ordered one and had their garage fit it. This supposedly didn't fix the issue - and they called again to say that they were going to fit a new compressor to try and solve the issue. Confused Now, I knew that the compressor was very unlikely to be a cause of a leak - but a new compressor is a new compressor, so I didn't let that slip on the phone. (As it turns out, they either didn't fit a new compressor, or they fitted a used one - as the one in the car is dated 2018).

Anyway, another couple of days passed and they called again to say that the Range Rover had been fixed and they would deliver it the next day. Great!

When the Range Rover arrived, I immediately noticed that it wasn't sitting level. It looked as though the rear right corner was well down, and the front was up.
I assumed this had been caused by the garage raising the car on a 2 post lift, carrying out suspension work on the front, and not performing a height calibration - so I wasn't too bothered at the moment of delivery.

However, upon driving the car for the first time since my test drive, I immediately felt that something was amiss with the ride quality. The magic carpet ride from the test drive was gone, and it was bumping and jolting over every imperfection in the road like a lowered MX5.

Now - to answer the inevitable questions about why I didn't immediately return the car to the dealer, here is why;

* It was purchased through eBay on a 'no reserve' basis. I knew there would be faults to solve at the price I paid.
* It was the cheapest running 4.4 TDV8 I've ever seen.
* With the car not riding level, I was fairly sure that performing a ride height calibration would solve the ride issue.
So, this is what I have replaced and done to try and solve the issues to date;

Ride height calibration - performed using SDD. This does level the ride nicely, but over a few days the ride becomes unlevel again, with the front always deciding to raise gradually over time.

Fitted a matching Bilstein VDS damper to the O/S rear. This appeared to help a little bit - the car felt perhaps a little more stable, but still nowhere near where it should be.

Carried out multiple calibrations of the Adaptive Damping module using both SDD and GAP IID tools. The SDD calibration appeared to have no effect at all. The IID calibration I carried out with the vehicle at a standstill, and again whilst driving along a smooth road. This seemed to soften the damping a little, but overall hardly noticeable and the ride over rough surfaces is still c**p.

Replaced the adaptive damping module with a 2nd hand unit, with no appreciable change.

Used a current clamp to measure the current applied to the rear VDS solenoids whilst driving. This revealed that the solenoids were getting the correct ~1.5A current during normal driving. This is also confirmed when viewing live data of the current demand in SDD and IID.

Unplugged a VDS wire from one damper to disable to system, and feel what it's like with the VDS 'turned off'. This gave an incredibly hard, totally solid ride on all four corners - so I think it's safe to say the VDS is operating at least to some extent. If it wasn't doing anything the ride would feel incredibly hard the whole time. As it is, it's just 'pretty' hard Laughing



There are no fault codes logged for anything to do with suspension. Everything I've done so far has improved the ride by perhaps 10 or 20% - but it's still nowhere near what I'd expect, and also nowhere near how I remember it from the test drive. It also still goes slowly out of height calibration, regardless of how many times I recalibrate.

Something that may be related is this error I got from SDD whilst I was doing the height calibration. I've searched and can't find any information on it.

"The longitudinal acceleration signal is outside the expected range. This may cause an unacceptable vehicle pitch if it is not corrected. Correcting this issue is achieved through procedures associated with the broadcasting ECU (the EPB controller on current vehicles)."

Image: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1a4tsfhD4T...sp=sharing

SDD did then go through the longitudinal acc sensor calibration procedure, which appeared to correct it - as I've not had this error on any subsequent diagnostics session.


Anyway, I apologise in advance for the really long post - but hopefully you guys can throw some light on these problems for me! P.s. The person who knows the answer will get an honourable mention on the next YouTube video and some free merchanise! Laughing Rolling with laughter

Post #590038 2nd Apr 2021 8:11pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Mikey



Member Since: 10 Jan 2008
Location: Dundee
Posts: 1738

Scotland 

Has it ever had front struts/shocks?

At 190k, if they are the originals, they will be well worn out...

Post #590046 2nd Apr 2021 9:14pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
GraemeS



Member Since: 06 Mar 2015
Location: Wagga area
Posts: 2455

Australia 2012 Range Rover Autobiography TDV8 Bournville

My suggestions:
1. Ensure that the rear height sensor arms are in the same relative position in case one has been refitted flipped after a shock change.
2. Find a slightly rough section of road to calibrate the CVDs - it's of no use doing it on a smooth surface. The couple of times that I've done it I've been driving at a constant 80 kph with a passenger pressing the start-calibration button on the phone.
3. As both rear shocks have required replacing, the fronts are likely to also be in need of replacing. If the fronts leak the oil will be out of sight inside the air-spring.
I'll be fitting front Bilsteins to mine tomorrow after having replaced the rears with Bilsteins a year ago, as the ride at the front has become harsh from lack of damping and the shocks have been recalibrated twice already.

There is no need to recalibrate height sensors after the vehicle has been lifted off its wheels.

Post #590047 2nd Apr 2021 9:21pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
LandyManSam



Member Since: 10 Jul 2019
Location: Wild West Ireland
Posts: 51

Ireland 2012 Range Rover Vogue TDV8 Santorini Black

Mikey wrote:
Has it ever had front struts/shocks?

At 190k, if they are the originals, they will be well worn out...


The fronts aren't very old - I think the date codes are 2017 or 2018, which would put them at between 40k and 50k miles covered roughly. The poor ride quality does seem to be mainly from the rear end of the vehicle, though it's difficult to tell.

Post #590049 2nd Apr 2021 9:42pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
LandyManSam



Member Since: 10 Jul 2019
Location: Wild West Ireland
Posts: 51

Ireland 2012 Range Rover Vogue TDV8 Santorini Black

GraemeS wrote:
My suggestions:
1. Ensure that the rear height sensor arms are in the same relative position in case one has been refitted flipped after a shock change.
2. Find a slightly rough section of road to calibrate the CVDs - it's of no use doing it on a smooth surface. The couple of times that I've done it I've been driving at a constant 80 kph with a passenger pressing the start-calibration button on the phone.
3. As both rear shocks have required replacing, the fronts are likely to also be in need of replacing. If the fronts leak the oil will be out of sight inside the air-spring.
I'll be fitting front Bilsteins to mine tomorrow after having replaced the rears with Bilsteins a year ago, as the ride at the front has become harsh from lack of damping and the shocks have been recalibrated twice already.

There is no need to recalibrate height sensors after the vehicle has been lifted off its wheels.


I'll check the sensors for orientation.

Regarding the IID adaptive damper calibration - can you explain how that works? Why is it that driving over a rough surface gives a different result to a stationary or smooth road?

See reply above re. front shocks.

Post #590050 2nd Apr 2021 9:44pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
coopss



Member Since: 21 Apr 2018
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 281

I also have this. Except it usually happens 5-15 minutes into a journey, sometime straight away, which makes me think it’s something electrical

Edit:

Quote:

Used a current clamp to measure the current applied to the rear VDS solenoids whilst driving. This revealed that the solenoids were getting the correct ~1.5A current during normal driving. This is also confirmed when viewing live data of the current demand in SDD and IID.


How did you read the values in IID tool? 1995 4.6 v8, green/tan (long gone)
2005 4.8iS X5, blue/black
2011 4.4 tdv8, black/black (gone)
2003 3.0d X5, Oxford green/black/manual
2021 p575 SVR, BR green/vintage tan

Post #590056 2nd Apr 2021 11:31pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
GraemeS



Member Since: 06 Mar 2015
Location: Wagga area
Posts: 2455

Australia 2012 Range Rover Autobiography TDV8 Bournville

The calibration process allows the ecu to determine how much to open the valves (varies the pwm duty cycle) on rough surfaces in order to provide a smooth ride, as detected by the 3 accelerometers mounted on the body. If the calibration surface is too smooth then the valves won't be opened enough on rougher surfaces and if too rough then the valves will be open too much on lesser surfaces resulting in inadequate damping. I tried several different surfaces and travel speeds on my initial calibration, finally settling on a stretch of road with minor surface irregularities at 80 kph then used the same stretch of road when recalibrating the next time. Mine's rear shocks were worst due to towing a van with a heavy ball weight but the fronts are now at the point where they're not doing a proper job.

Post #590060 3rd Apr 2021 12:25am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
QuebecTango



Member Since: 06 Jan 2019
Location: Brighton
Posts: 55

United Kingdom 2011 Range Rover Vogue TDV8 Nara Bronze

Hi Sam,
I think your issue may lie with the suspension loosing its cal’ . You have established the VDS is functional by disconnecting a damper which effectively makes it inoperative.

Regarding the suspension cal’ just thinking out loud, have you a wiring issue to the rear height sensors or a height sensor issue. Maybe check resistance & for short to power/ ground of the sensor wiring back to the module, it maybe that it’s not enough not set a DTC but enough to alter the level of the vehicle. If a resistance check proves ok you may still have a problem with the wiring as a multimeter does not “load” the wire. If possible run a 21w bulb through each wire, if you can isolate through the plugs, and note any significant voltage drop.
It appears from your excellent rendition of events that this issue has established itself after disturbance with other related repairs or may be purely coincidental.

Great videos BTW, look forward to the root cause of this as I’m sure many others will as well
QT

Post #590065 3rd Apr 2021 4:29am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
GraemeS



Member Since: 06 Mar 2015
Location: Wagga area
Posts: 2455

Australia 2012 Range Rover Autobiography TDV8 Bournville

The height sensor signals are extremely unlikely to support a 21W load which would therefore damage the height sensor. If the fault is with a height sensor then it will be that the sensor is sending incorrect values due being faulty, not a circuit continuity issue.

Was the replacement sensor a LR genuine part? I've read of after-market sensors giving false readings.

Post #590067 3rd Apr 2021 6:29am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
QuebecTango



Member Since: 06 Jan 2019
Location: Brighton
Posts: 55

United Kingdom 2011 Range Rover Vogue TDV8 Nara Bronze

I agree, I am suggesting to test the wire at each end disconnected from the module & sensors, sorry if that confused

Post #590076 3rd Apr 2021 8:00am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
LandyManSam



Member Since: 10 Jul 2019
Location: Wild West Ireland
Posts: 51

Ireland 2012 Range Rover Vogue TDV8 Santorini Black

coopss wrote:
I also have this. Except it usually happens 5-15 minutes into a journey, sometime straight away, which makes me think it’s something electrical

Edit:

Quote:

Used a current clamp to measure the current applied to the rear VDS solenoids whilst driving. This revealed that the solenoids were getting the correct ~1.5A current during normal driving. This is also confirmed when viewing live data of the current demand in SDD and IID.


How did you read the values in IID tool?


Thinking about it, mine seems to be similar whereby the first couple of minutes of the journey are noticeably smoother. How strange! Did yours start doing this suddenly, or did it gradually get worse over time?

GraemeS wrote:
The calibration process allows the ecu to determine how much to open the valves (varies the pwm duty cycle) on rough surfaces in order to provide a smooth ride, as detected by the 3 accelerometers mounted on the body. If the calibration surface is too smooth then the valves won't be opened enough on rougher surfaces and if too rough then the valves will be open too much on lesser surfaces resulting in inadequate damping. I tried several different surfaces and travel speeds on my initial calibration, finally settling on a stretch of road with minor surface irregularities at 80 kph then used the same stretch of road when recalibrating the next time. Mine's rear shocks were worst due to towing a van with a heavy ball weight but the fronts are now at the point where they're not doing a proper job.


Ah, I thought it was the other way around - where a smooth calibration surface would give you a lower damping rate and a rough surface would give you a higher damping rate? Currently, mine is definitely OVERdamped over imperfections etc. I will try recalibrating on different surfaces but I'm not too confident it'll have much effect (going by my previous tries).

R.e. the height sensors, is there a way to check what they are reading vs. the set height?
Also - has anyone else heard of the 'longitudinal acceleration sensor' causing an incorrect vehicle pitch before?





I stuck my head under the back of the truck earlier and noticed that the subframe bushes look a little past their best-

Click image to enlarge


Click image to enlarge


Thanks all for the replies so far Bow down

Post #590670 8th Apr 2021 5:06pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
coopss



Member Since: 21 Apr 2018
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 281

That’s one of the accelerometers that affects the damper ECU. There are three I think and from memory this one is under the spare wheel cover.

To answer your question about the history of my issue similar to yours: it’s always been like this in my ownership. I have no errors on mine.

Watching the bonnet movement in relation to the road does seems as though it’s the front bouncing but as per your notes it feels like it’s the back Question 1995 4.6 v8, green/tan (long gone)
2005 4.8iS X5, blue/black
2011 4.4 tdv8, black/black (gone)
2003 3.0d X5, Oxford green/black/manual
2021 p575 SVR, BR green/vintage tan

Post #590686 8th Apr 2021 9:21pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
D3Jon



Member Since: 15 Aug 2020
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 418

United Kingdom 

Great vids, been watching with interest! Thumbs Up

WRT your issues - I've seen it mentioned on another thread here (so not my idea) that one or more of the accelerometers could be loose and not secured correctly, giving these symptoms. Worth a check. Smile

Jon 1992 RR Classic 3.9 efi Vogue
2014 Disco 4 HSE
===================
Both my fatties now gone...
Previous: 2011 L322 4.4 TDV8 Vogue SE /// 2002 L322 4.4 V8 HSE /// 2009 Discovery 3 2.7 TDV6 XS /// 2004 Defender 90 TD5 /// 1993 110 V8 Snatch Landrover /// 2005 Discovery 3 2.7 TDV6 SE (Aus) /// 1990 110 Isuzu 3.9 County (Aus) /// 1976 Series III Trayback (Aus)

Post #590707 9th Apr 2021 11:16am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
D3Jon



Member Since: 15 Aug 2020
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 418

United Kingdom 

LandyManSam wrote:

R.e. the height sensors, is there a way to check what they are reading vs. the set height?


The output voltages from the height sensors can be read with most tools, definetely with the IID - but you know that already right? So I must be mis-understanding your question.

As you know, every height sensor will give a slightly different output voltage for a given height to another sensor. Hence the need to calibrate them upon replacement. If you want to check them, I'd raise / lower the vehicle whilst looking at the output. You could also inflate / deflate bags with the IID and look at the output.

A better test, would be to disconnect the actuator arm and manually operate the height sensor throughout its range of motion looking at the output voltage with your scan tool. This should be in the range of 0-5v from memory. You're looking for a smooth output with no sudden spikes, similar to when diagnosing a TD5 accelerator pedal (which I'd think you're familiar with).

Bit of a wild-card, but has someone fitting the wrong height sensor to this at some point? I recall from when I did one of mine that earlier cars with Halogen headlights have a different sensor to cars fitted with Xenon's. They have a similar plug, but more pins are used for the self-levelling xenon's.

Jon 1992 RR Classic 3.9 efi Vogue
2014 Disco 4 HSE
===================
Both my fatties now gone...
Previous: 2011 L322 4.4 TDV8 Vogue SE /// 2002 L322 4.4 V8 HSE /// 2009 Discovery 3 2.7 TDV6 XS /// 2004 Defender 90 TD5 /// 1993 110 V8 Snatch Landrover /// 2005 Discovery 3 2.7 TDV6 SE (Aus) /// 1990 110 Isuzu 3.9 County (Aus) /// 1976 Series III Trayback (Aus)

Post #590709 9th Apr 2021 11:35am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
GraemeS



Member Since: 06 Mar 2015
Location: Wagga area
Posts: 2455

Australia 2012 Range Rover Autobiography TDV8 Bournville

The height sensors with 6 pins are a twin height sensor used only on the later L322 whereby the 2nd height signal is used by the CVD ecu. However the height sensors used on the L494, L405 and later-released vehicles have only 1 height sensor/signal which is shared by height control and CVD control, being located within the one enclosure compared with the L322's 2 distinct modules.

Bi-xenon headlights that swivel use a headlamp levelling ecu to keep the beam level under hard braking and hard acceleration whereas fixed bi-xenon and halogen headlights don't.

Post #590769 10th Apr 2021 2:48am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 30 123 ... 282930>
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
fullfatrr.com RSS Feed - All Forums


Switch to Mobile site