![]() | Home > General > Buying: 100k+ miles versus paying more for lower miles |
![]() ![]() |
|
|
dexion7 Member Since: 06 Jun 2013 Location: Tynemouth Posts: 291 ![]() ![]() |
I'd say buy a RR on condition rather than mileage, more so than most other vehicle types. |
||
![]() |
|
rjff Member Since: 28 Oct 2017 Location: Cambridgeshire Posts: 1196 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lots of thoughts on here about this, so I would say have a good read and then come back for any clarification.
|
||
![]() |
|
DrRob Member Since: 16 Apr 2015 Location: Petersfield, Hampshire Posts: 4321 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Higher milers generally have had the issues that go at 70 to 80K sorted. For example, oil cooler in the V leaks. Gone to a good home: 2011 4.4 TDV8 Vogue SE Buckingham Blue with Ivory and clear glass = "Rory"
|
||
![]() |
|
Dolphinboy Member Since: 07 Dec 2009 Location: Bristol Posts: 3196 ![]() ![]() |
@OP
|
||
![]() |
|
Pawl Member Since: 07 Nov 2017 Location: West Midlands Posts: 697 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Beyond 50,000 ~60,000 miles it should all be about service history and condition as the suspension can already be at the point lots need replacing - which if you have to use dealers can be expensive.
|
||
![]() |
|
jim4244 Member Since: 31 May 2012 Location: UK Posts: 853 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I’m running a 2005 Td6 which has just ticked over the 100,000 mile mark. She doesn’t miss a beat and I put this down to a strict service regime using quality fluids and parts along with good preventive maintenance.
|
||
![]() |
|
gj88 Member Since: 10 Sep 2018 Location: West Midlands Posts: 213 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Condition and service history over all else.
|
||
![]() |
|
DrRob Member Since: 16 Apr 2015 Location: Petersfield, Hampshire Posts: 4321 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
IID Bluetooth advice is spot on. Get one. If you don’t eventually buy a Land Rover then sell it at minimal loss. They hold their value extremely well |
||
![]() |
|
TJH1985 Member Since: 11 Feb 2015 Location: Nottingham Posts: 664 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I purchased at 50k and now have 97k on it.. I would say that over 80k was when the suspension started to need a refresh and pretty much now has had them all done now, so in reality something with 100k probably needs less spending than one with 70/80k over a few years period at lease suspension wise and assuming the owner looked after it.
|
||
![]() |
|
M@r]{ Member Since: 03 Nov 2019 Location: Northants Posts: 165 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks all. I've got my eye on two cars:
|
||
![]() |
|
stan Site Moderator Member Since: 13 Jul 2010 Location: a moderate moderated moderator moderating moderately in moderation Posts: 35486 ![]() ![]() |
both those are overpriced...a member here has just sold his 2012 for just under £14k and i think thats the kinda price you should be looking at....
|
||
![]() |
|
rjff Member Since: 28 Oct 2017 Location: Cambridgeshire Posts: 1196 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Agree with Stan, they are overpriced. That was the price at least couple of years ago dealers were hoping for. and not gertting.
|
||
![]() |
|
TJH1985 Member Since: 11 Feb 2015 Location: Nottingham Posts: 664 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Got to be careful with the results from the tool, something as simple as a low battery can flag up a whole host of errors! I don’t think I have cleared ours so you can see all sorts going back years ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
M@r]{ Member Since: 03 Nov 2019 Location: Northants Posts: 165 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I didn't think they were too bad on price. Sure I can find lower spec cars for under £15k, but a >2010 Autobiography seems a differnt story. (although I'm only looking at ones with light coloured interior, HD sound system, rear seat cooling, so the pickings are slimmer)
|
||
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ae0e/3ae0ea418f535f5c2f69ecd8f4c2aa1e454dbd53" alt=""