Advertise on fullfatrr.com »

Home > Technical (L322) > What's difference between prop coupling on derv / petrol ?
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 2 of 3 <123>
Print this entire topic · 
miggit



Member Since: 12 Jul 2014
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 3657

United Kingdom 

Zulu 10 wrote:


Please forgive me if I have got a firm grasp of the wrong end of the stick, but when you say "no way of setting bearing loads correctly" I presume you mean no way with diff in the vehicle. I know that it's a PITA but have you considered removing the diff and taking it to a specialist?

The place I have in mind is BGH Geartech in Cranbrook - assuming that Brian is still alive of course, God bless him, irascible doesn't do just to him, but he's the only person that I trust with my competition car diffs.


Have a look at this http://www.fullfatrr.com/forum/topic39560.html

Basically you need the LR special jig to hold the diff in the right angle, and then you need the LR torque tool to measure the torque when the pinion is rotated and you have to gradually load the bearings... if at any point you go over... strip it out, throw away the collapsible spacer and start again. Shocked

And then it gets better... As far as I know this bit of kit will not work with the early style pinion coupling and will only work with the new flange type.... so your in to £800 before you start Evil or Very Mad Yesterday I couldn't spell Engineer... Today I are one!
Inventor of the 'Guide-o-Matic automatic wheel alignment tool'
Former long term L322 owner, Up/Down graded to a Classic Tractor!

Post #406883 28th Sep 2016 10:16pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
birchyman71



Member Since: 18 Feb 2013
Location: stockton on tees
Posts: 147

United Kingdom 2008 Range Rover Vogue TDV8 Java Black

I would buy a second hand diff and prop off an internet auction site that already have the flange drive done and swap them out with yours fluid change for the diff and new drive shaft oil seals if your that bothered probably the cheapest solution , I feel your pain as this same thing happened to my td6 in 2011 sat at a roadside with no drive , but as it was already booked in to get the recall done but had been postponed 2 or 3 times due to lack of parts ,I had it recovered to the dealers and landrover did it for free !
Prop less than £100 diff about £200

Post #406921 29th Sep 2016 8:06am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
miggit



Member Since: 12 Jul 2014
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 3657

United Kingdom 

Don't get me wrong, the car has been fixed, with a new old style coupling, but as there is no way of torquing the coupling it was a case of best guess....... how long best guess lasts is anybodies idea.... the S/H diff and prop will be the next thing should the worst happen.... but finding a TD6 diff that's been modded isn't as easy as it sounds.... there are plenty of V8's but I think they are a different ratio Sad Yesterday I couldn't spell Engineer... Today I are one!
Inventor of the 'Guide-o-Matic automatic wheel alignment tool'
Former long term L322 owner, Up/Down graded to a Classic Tractor!

Post #406923 29th Sep 2016 8:18am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
birchyman71



Member Since: 18 Feb 2013
Location: stockton on tees
Posts: 147

United Kingdom 2008 Range Rover Vogue TDV8 Java Black

There are several of the mod'd diffs on eBay now and plenty of props , if you've fixed it happy days

Post #406924 29th Sep 2016 8:29am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Zulu 10



Member Since: 28 Nov 2014
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 88

United Kingdom 

miggit wrote:
Zulu 10 wrote:


Please forgive me if I have got a firm grasp of the wrong end of the stick, but when you say "no way of setting bearing loads correctly" I presume you mean no way with diff in the vehicle. I know that it's a PITA but have you considered removing the diff and taking it to a specialist?

The place I have in mind is BGH Geartech in Cranbrook - assuming that Brian is still alive of course, God bless him, irascible doesn't do just to him, but he's the only person that I trust with my competition car diffs.


Have a look at this http://www.fullfatrr.com/forum/topic39560.html

Basically you need the LR special jig to hold the diff in the right angle, and then you need the LR torque tool to measure the torque when the pinion is rotated and you have to gradually load the bearings... if at any point you go over... strip it out, throw away the collapsible spacer and start again. Shocked

And then it gets better... As far as I know this bit of kit will not work with the early style pinion coupling and will only work with the new flange type.... so your in to £800 before you start Evil or Very Mad


Yes, that's the usual way most pinions with crush tubes are set up, with the preload measured by the torque to turn the pinion. Certainly that's the way that Brian set up the Quaife ATB in my Escort Mk2 rear axle.
The need for a jig to hold the diff is simply to make the task easy and repeatable - it's nothing that couldn't be jury-rigged for the purposes of a one off.
The measurement of torque can be achieved with a length of bar and a spring balance, and it's usual to set pinion height using a DTI.

Why, you may ask, if I know so much about it, do I still pay Brian to build my diffs and gearboxes? Good question, well presented!

Post #406927 29th Sep 2016 9:13am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Weejock



Member Since: 30 Dec 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 417

2002 Range Rover Vogue 4.4 V8 Epsom Green

As above it's nothing that can't be jury rigged to do, you are just setting the pre-load based on the rotational torque resistance of the pinion shaft in the bearing (4Nm).

If you've ever done the steering swivels on a Land Rover then it's virtually the same, you use shims to set the pre-load on the swivel so you get x amount of pull measured with a spring balance (equivalent of torque).
You could easily do the same with a spring balance or a fixed weight at a certain distance and working out the moment (4Nm = 0.4kg/m) which looks to be the way LR do it albeit with a fancy tool.

To be honest just live with what you've done, if it fails then just stick in a 2nd hand diff and prop.

Post #406993 29th Sep 2016 3:51pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
miggit



Member Since: 12 Jul 2014
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 3657

United Kingdom 

I'm afraid that you haven't looked at what your dealing with....

the coupling looks like this



Looks like this on the diff



So could you please tell me how you bolt on an arm to measure the torque? also how long does the arm have to be? The laws of physics dictate that the longer the lever the easier the work, so without the correct length arm there is no way to get an accurate reading Evil or Very Mad And there is no way of fixing it to the diff Banging Head Banging Head

The replacement coupling looks like this, arm attachment is easy.....



Oh and that's the back at the top, prop bolts on to the 6 holes at the bottom of pic Thumbs Up Yesterday I couldn't spell Engineer... Today I are one!
Inventor of the 'Guide-o-Matic automatic wheel alignment tool'
Former long term L322 owner, Up/Down graded to a Classic Tractor!

Post #407050 29th Sep 2016 10:23pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Zulu 10



Member Since: 28 Nov 2014
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 88

United Kingdom 

Honestly I do understand exactly what we're dealing with here.

All that we’re trying to measure here is what I will crudely describe as a friction force i.e. the very small amount of torque required to rotate the pinion in its housing – it’s no different to doing any other form of opposing taper roller bearing such as a wheel bearing, although we generally do those by end float.

You don’t necessarily have to bolt on anything to measure the torque figure: a length of 25 x 3mm steel bar with the last 50mm bent through 90º and then attached to the coupling with a couple of jubilee clips would suffice.

The preload torque is so small at 1.4Nm that you’re not going to unseat the clips.

I’m unsure whether I understand your question “also how long does the arm have to be”, because the length of the bar is unimportant so long as you know the distance between the axis and the point where the load is applied.

The point about torque is that it simply defines a moment which means that 1.4Nm can be achieved by a force of 1.4Newtons at a distance of 1 metre or 14 Newtons at a distance of 100mm: the result is the same.

Basic physics defines F = ma where F= force, m = mass and a = acceleration.

To determine the vertical force which results from a given mass just substitute g (9.81N/kg) for a.

For example if I (mass 92kg) hang from a horizontal bar at a point 2metres from the pivot I will produce a moment of 2 x 92 x 9.81 or 1805 Nm.

If I’m told to do a nut up to 200Nm then I know that I can achieve that using a bar that is roughly 11% of that length.
N.B. That is when I hang vertically from a horizontal bar.

In your case, if you drill a hole in the aforementioned bit of 25mm x 3mm bar at a distance 300mm from the axis of the coupling then you need a spring balance pull of a little under half a kilo to generate the correct torque.

Post #407055 29th Sep 2016 11:06pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
miggit



Member Since: 12 Jul 2014
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 3657

United Kingdom 

Shocked I knew that Isaac Newton was lurking on this site somewhere Shocked

I understand what your saying, sort of... was a lot easier with the swivel hubs on a Landy cos you put a spring balance on the steering arm and pulled (about 7lbs if I remember correctly) Wink As there was no description of the special tool and spring rates it sort of went over my head..... If some one says put a 300mm bar on the diff and pull at xx kgs that is great. I do realise that the length of the bar is irrelevant, but the fixing distance from the centre of the diff is critical. And you are right a bent bit of tin and some jubilee clips should do the job, along with the use of a vice.

This info isn't out there, so it's a bit hard to work out what to do.... while it's not beyond most peeps, removing a diff and lashing up a jerry build rig... working out the best way of getting the correct rotational force is a real head ache.... I was asleep during that lesson Embarassed Yesterday I couldn't spell Engineer... Today I are one!
Inventor of the 'Guide-o-Matic automatic wheel alignment tool'
Former long term L322 owner, Up/Down graded to a Classic Tractor!

Post #407056 29th Sep 2016 11:25pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Zulu 10



Member Since: 28 Nov 2014
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 88

United Kingdom 

miggit wrote:


I was asleep during that lesson



I can probably relate to exactly why you were asleep, but don't get me started on the quality, or lack of it, of the teaching of mathematics and engineering skills in this country.

I remain convinced that most mathematics teachers don't understand how to practically apply it to the real world, and that most people think that the engineering skill means the ability to use CAD/CAM. What they 'don't get' is the need for people to have a 'feel' for what feels right.

Frankly needing half a kilo on the end of a foot rule to rotate a new pinion mentally feels a bit tight to me, that said of course that is with the crown wheel already installed, so that will inevitably blur the accuracy...

My late father was an old school mechanical engineer so he'd taught me all about the principles of moments in my early teenage years, so other than having to unlearn lbfft and learn Nm I was asleep in Physics 'cos Dad had already taught me.

At this point of course someone will come along and point out that what I typed last night after a couple of glasses of Pouilly Fumé is all complete bolloeaux because I got a decimal point in the wrong place... Embarassed

Edited: Have just read what you wrote "but the fixing distance from the centre of the diff is critical" and no, it isn't, what matter is the distance between the centre of the pinion axis and the point where the force/load is applied. It matters not whether you use jubilee clips to affix your bar to the approx 40mm sleeve of the old style fixing, or bolts to affix a bar to the 100mm diameter flange of the revised style coupling, so long as you know the distance from the rotational centre to the load point. Does that make sense?

Hopefully this will explain how Torque T1 = F1 x d1 and T2 = F2 x d2 and to get the same torque either variable can be manipulated.
N.B. I've used F for force rather than m for mass on the diagram which will probably upset the purist - just remember that Force is roughly ten times mass.

Post #407074 30th Sep 2016 5:58am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
RRPhil



Member Since: 22 Aug 2011
Location: Blackburn, Lancashire
Posts: 963

United Kingdom 

The pinion must be rotating continuously when you measure the preload torque. Just wrap a piece of string around the splined drive tube (whose diameter you can simply measure to determine the radius) several times and attach the end to a spring balance and pull.

Phil

Post #407088 30th Sep 2016 8:09am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Zulu 10



Member Since: 28 Nov 2014
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 88

United Kingdom 

I must admit that I'd only ever seen/heard of it being done using a lever arm and spring balance, but the string technique is very elegant, and could possibly be done in situ, so long as the output shafts are disconnected?

Edited to correct my stupidity - couldn't be done in situ, because of the presence of the crownwheel with no way of accurately compensating.


Last edited by Zulu 10 on 30th Sep 2016 9:24am. Edited 1 time in total

Post #407090 30th Sep 2016 8:32am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Weejock



Member Since: 30 Dec 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 417

2002 Range Rover Vogue 4.4 V8 Epsom Green

I like that string method, over comes the inertia and rotation issue Thumbs Up

As the 'official' method is done without anything installed except obviously the pinion shaft/gear then I would have thought you would have to do the same. The extra drag of the crown wheel/output shaft bearings will add to the drag even if the shafts are removed and give a false higher reading?
Then again those bearings, although look to be taper bearings, don't have a preload other than provided by the casing torque specs.

Thoughts?

Post #407094 30th Sep 2016 8:53am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
miggit



Member Since: 12 Jul 2014
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 3657

United Kingdom 

Shocked Just been back to skool, lost me at Hello Shocked

Is it just me, or does the goal posts keep moving? from a rotational force we are now at a constant rotational force, that is not as easy to be accurate with. Although wrapping a bit of string around the coupling and measuring the pull, is actually easier than the attaching a lever......

So we now have the string wrapped around the coupling, and anchored with a jubilee clip.... so how hard do you have to pull to get the correct setting? And then from that answer we can work out how strong both you and the string have to be Wink

FYI the coupling is exactly 55.00 mm in diameter Yesterday I couldn't spell Engineer... Today I are one!
Inventor of the 'Guide-o-Matic automatic wheel alignment tool'
Former long term L322 owner, Up/Down graded to a Classic Tractor!

Post #407097 30th Sep 2016 9:26am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Zulu 10



Member Since: 28 Nov 2014
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 88

United Kingdom 

Weejock wrote:
I like that string method, over comes the inertia and rotation issue Thumbs Up

As the 'official' method is done without anything installed except obviously the pinion shaft/gear then I would have thought you would have to do the same. The extra drag of the crown wheel/output shaft bearings will add to the drag even if the shafts are removed and give a false higher reading?
Then again those bearings, although look to be taper bearings, don't have a preload other than provided by the casing torque specs.

Thoughts?

You are of course absolutely correct - the removal of the crownwheel means that the only drag is that resulting from the pinion.

On thinking about the string method my olny slight reservation is that at such a small radius any dimensional measurement error would have a significant effect. Assuming that the sleeve is 2" in diameter, then a 1mm error would mean a 4% torque error - admittedly the 1.4Nm is ±0.2Nm or ± 14.3% so you’ve probably still got some margin.

I wonder how the 60rpm speed is expected to be achieved...


Last edited by Zulu 10 on 30th Sep 2016 9:37am. Edited 1 time in total

Post #407098 30th Sep 2016 9:30am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 2 of 3 <123>
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
fullfatrr.com RSS Feed - All Forums


Switch to Mobile site