Home > Technical (L322) > What's difference between prop coupling on derv / petrol ? |
|
|
miggit Member Since: 12 Jul 2014 Location: Milton Keynes Posts: 3657 |
Have a look at this http://www.fullfatrr.com/forum/topic39560.html Basically you need the LR special jig to hold the diff in the right angle, and then you need the LR torque tool to measure the torque when the pinion is rotated and you have to gradually load the bearings... if at any point you go over... strip it out, throw away the collapsible spacer and start again. And then it gets better... As far as I know this bit of kit will not work with the early style pinion coupling and will only work with the new flange type.... so your in to £800 before you start Yesterday I couldn't spell Engineer... Today I are one! Inventor of the 'Guide-o-Matic automatic wheel alignment tool' Former long term L322 owner, Up/Down graded to a Classic Tractor! |
||
28th Sep 2016 10:16pm |
|
miggit Member Since: 12 Jul 2014 Location: Milton Keynes Posts: 3657 |
Don't get me wrong, the car has been fixed, with a new old style coupling, but as there is no way of torquing the coupling it was a case of best guess....... how long best guess lasts is anybodies idea.... the S/H diff and prop will be the next thing should the worst happen.... but finding a TD6 diff that's been modded isn't as easy as it sounds.... there are plenty of V8's but I think they are a different ratio Yesterday I couldn't spell Engineer... Today I are one!
|
||
29th Sep 2016 8:18am |
|
birchyman71 Member Since: 18 Feb 2013 Location: stockton on tees Posts: 147 |
There are several of the mod'd diffs on eBay now and plenty of props , if you've fixed it happy days |
||
29th Sep 2016 8:29am |
|
Zulu 10 Member Since: 28 Nov 2014 Location: Hampshire Posts: 88 |
Yes, that's the usual way most pinions with crush tubes are set up, with the preload measured by the torque to turn the pinion. Certainly that's the way that Brian set up the Quaife ATB in my Escort Mk2 rear axle. The need for a jig to hold the diff is simply to make the task easy and repeatable - it's nothing that couldn't be jury-rigged for the purposes of a one off. The measurement of torque can be achieved with a length of bar and a spring balance, and it's usual to set pinion height using a DTI. Why, you may ask, if I know so much about it, do I still pay Brian to build my diffs and gearboxes? Good question, well presented! |
||
29th Sep 2016 9:13am |
|
Weejock Member Since: 30 Dec 2011 Location: UK Posts: 417 |
As above it's nothing that can't be jury rigged to do, you are just setting the pre-load based on the rotational torque resistance of the pinion shaft in the bearing (4Nm).
|
||
29th Sep 2016 3:51pm |
|
miggit Member Since: 12 Jul 2014 Location: Milton Keynes Posts: 3657 |
I'm afraid that you haven't looked at what your dealing with....
|
||
29th Sep 2016 10:23pm |
|
Zulu 10 Member Since: 28 Nov 2014 Location: Hampshire Posts: 88 |
Honestly I do understand exactly what we're dealing with here.
|
||
29th Sep 2016 11:06pm |
|
miggit Member Since: 12 Jul 2014 Location: Milton Keynes Posts: 3657 |
I knew that Isaac Newton was lurking on this site somewhere
|
||
29th Sep 2016 11:25pm |
|
Zulu 10 Member Since: 28 Nov 2014 Location: Hampshire Posts: 88 |
I can probably relate to exactly why you were asleep, but don't get me started on the quality, or lack of it, of the teaching of mathematics and engineering skills in this country. I remain convinced that most mathematics teachers don't understand how to practically apply it to the real world, and that most people think that the engineering skill means the ability to use CAD/CAM. What they 'don't get' is the need for people to have a 'feel' for what feels right. Frankly needing half a kilo on the end of a foot rule to rotate a new pinion mentally feels a bit tight to me, that said of course that is with the crown wheel already installed, so that will inevitably blur the accuracy... My late father was an old school mechanical engineer so he'd taught me all about the principles of moments in my early teenage years, so other than having to unlearn lbfft and learn Nm I was asleep in Physics 'cos Dad had already taught me. At this point of course someone will come along and point out that what I typed last night after a couple of glasses of Pouilly Fumé is all complete bolloeaux because I got a decimal point in the wrong place... Edited: Have just read what you wrote "but the fixing distance from the centre of the diff is critical" and no, it isn't, what matter is the distance between the centre of the pinion axis and the point where the force/load is applied. It matters not whether you use jubilee clips to affix your bar to the approx 40mm sleeve of the old style fixing, or bolts to affix a bar to the 100mm diameter flange of the revised style coupling, so long as you know the distance from the rotational centre to the load point. Does that make sense? Hopefully this will explain how Torque T1 = F1 x d1 and T2 = F2 x d2 and to get the same torque either variable can be manipulated. N.B. I've used F for force rather than m for mass on the diagram which will probably upset the purist - just remember that Force is roughly ten times mass. |
||||
30th Sep 2016 5:58am |
|
RRPhil Member Since: 22 Aug 2011 Location: Blackburn, Lancashire Posts: 963 |
The pinion must be rotating continuously when you measure the preload torque. Just wrap a piece of string around the splined drive tube (whose diameter you can simply measure to determine the radius) several times and attach the end to a spring balance and pull.
|
||
30th Sep 2016 8:09am |
|
Zulu 10 Member Since: 28 Nov 2014 Location: Hampshire Posts: 88 |
I must admit that I'd only ever seen/heard of it being done using a lever arm and spring balance, but the string technique is very elegant, and could possibly be done in situ, so long as the output shafts are disconnected?
|
||
30th Sep 2016 8:32am |
|
Weejock Member Since: 30 Dec 2011 Location: UK Posts: 417 |
I like that string method, over comes the inertia and rotation issue
|
||
30th Sep 2016 8:53am |
|
miggit Member Since: 12 Jul 2014 Location: Milton Keynes Posts: 3657 |
Just been back to skool, lost me at Hello
|
||
30th Sep 2016 9:26am |
|
Zulu 10 Member Since: 28 Nov 2014 Location: Hampshire Posts: 88 |
You are of course absolutely correct - the removal of the crownwheel means that the only drag is that resulting from the pinion. On thinking about the string method my olny slight reservation is that at such a small radius any dimensional measurement error would have a significant effect. Assuming that the sleeve is 2" in diameter, then a 1mm error would mean a 4% torque error - admittedly the 1.4Nm is ±0.2Nm or ± 14.3% so you’ve probably still got some margin. I wonder how the 60rpm speed is expected to be achieved... Last edited by Zulu 10 on 30th Sep 2016 9:37am. Edited 1 time in total |
||
30th Sep 2016 9:30am |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis