Home > General > Opinion on Bull bar |
|
|
JohnnyDangerous Member Since: 16 Dec 2012 Location: East Sussex Posts: 833 |
Ah greetings Mr Trommel, happy new year to you sir and time for a fresh start etc. Strange how as i expected all RR owners hate it but not 1 non RR owner inc the Mrs has not liked it, I think it totally changes the look of the RR. I was going to fit it after my CEC along with chrome side tubes......I know I know but Im an old yank fan so like a bit of bling. One day your life will flash before your eyes......................................make sure yours is worth watching!
|
||
7th Jan 2013 7:08pm |
|
wats39 Member Since: 08 Jul 2012 Location: fife Posts: 77 |
Don't like the bull bar but the side tubes get a from me. quite like them. even better if they were side exhaust pipes with minimal silencing:D would make the v8 sound amazing. especially if you're a yank fan. my brother has a rover v8 in a lotus 7 style kitcar with sidepipes and the sound never fails to put a huge smile on your face. expect the mpg to go down considerably though as your right foot will suddenly be full of lead the noise may not suit the ffrr though. just me fantasizing again '04 td6 se
|
||
7th Jan 2013 9:47pm |
|
DMRR Member Since: 14 Apr 2010 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 2027 |
Pointless
|
||
7th Jan 2013 10:15pm |
|
JohnnyDangerous Member Since: 16 Dec 2012 Location: East Sussex Posts: 833 |
Yeah but you should have seen the kangaroo
|
||
7th Jan 2013 11:25pm |
|
Fox Member Since: 02 Apr 2010 Location: Essex Posts: 2313 |
In my opinion...
|
||
8th Jan 2013 8:34am |
|
steptoe Member Since: 23 Jul 2012 Location: london Posts: 382 |
I only had a little one in africa. And i didn't really need it in all the times i've been. .
|
||||
8th Jan 2013 9:29pm |
|
Laurie915 Member Since: 11 Sep 2011 Location: Canberra Posts: 72 |
In Oz many have been using a modified D3 ARB bar on the L322's,as seen in my gallery. (dont know how to paste here) Unfortunately it still hasn't got ADR (Australian Design Rules) air-bag compatible accreditation yet, but it's in the pipeline. We have a ADR bar for the P38 so things do happen, even if slowly. Re the alloy bar on the ute, that’s typical of alloy in a collision, most serious off roaders use a steel bar for strength and repair options at remote stations/towns etc.
|
||
9th Jan 2013 4:21am |
|
ebajema Member Since: 24 Mar 2011 Location: New Plymouth Posts: 4782 |
I think any bullbars/guard etc. are f*gly on the L322. Mine had the full works black plastic factory ones and I hated the look every day. So I had it removed and despite the big holes in the bumper (new bumper is almost on its way), I prefer this to the bars.
|
||
9th Jan 2013 7:58am |
|
Laurie915 Member Since: 11 Sep 2011 Location: Canberra Posts: 72 |
We still have an ongoing debate about bullbars here, but with the amount of wildlife that is killed on our roads the main objectors live in the capitals !!! So it's an ongoing debate even at Gov't levels. |
||
9th Jan 2013 11:23pm |
|
ebajema Member Since: 24 Mar 2011 Location: New Plymouth Posts: 4782 |
From what I have seen living in Aussie, bull bars or better roo bars make sense there. Especially outside the big cities. It is very sad to see the large amounts of roos lying by the side of the road but it is a lot worse when people get hurt by hitting them (I drove past a memorial for a motorbike rider every day, very close to my place, that got killed running into a kangaroo). As far as I am concerned in Aussie they make sense, even in Africa (outside the big cities) they make sense, but they should be proper designs (like a lot of the ones I have seen in Aussie) for what they are supposed to do.
|
||
10th Jan 2013 7:39am |
|
JohnnyDangerous Member Since: 16 Dec 2012 Location: East Sussex Posts: 833 |
But getting hit by a 2500kg car will be fine then? Unless you are above the bonnet there is going to be very little difference in injury, RR dont collapse like a normal salon car to decrease injuries, its a metal wall hitting you. One day your life will flash before your eyes......................................make sure yours is worth watching!
|
||
10th Jan 2013 8:28am |
|
Philip Member Since: 05 Jan 2010 Location: UK Posts: 2577 |
Course they do, controlled deformation via crumple zones together with a rigid safety cell is how you're protected in a modern car. A modern Range Rover is no different, even if it is bigger and heavier than most cars. |
||
10th Jan 2013 11:17am |
|
The Brains Trust Member Since: 23 Sep 2011 Location: Melbourne Posts: 155 |
I think he meant if you were a pedestrian getting cleaned up by one... I think it is a dangerous piece of legislation - a slippery slope from there to being forced to design the front of the car to protect pedestrians, which would mean no more flat fronted big cars - like Range Rovers.
|
||
10th Jan 2013 11:25am |
|
Simes Member Since: 30 Aug 2011 Location: Hinckley Posts: 964 |
On the bright-side, there will be less damage to the car that will have to be paid for by the child's parents who let them run out into the path of a 2.5 tonne car. |
||
10th Jan 2013 11:32am |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis