Home > General > Which one to go for, 4.4 V8 petrol, TD6 or TDV8 |
|
|
M44K TS Member Since: 09 Feb 2010 Location: North East U.K. Posts: 1325 |
For the little extra in fuel, the petrol V8 is a nice accompaniment. The TD6's are ok, but can be a little pedestrian, a remap will sort that though, and it will probably be a bit better on juice than the V8, but not a huge difference, don't go expecting 40mpg from one
|
||
1st May 2012 10:53pm |
|
VMPP Member Since: 12 Jul 2009 Location: Lisboa Posts: 410 |
That's a no-brainer...
|
||
2nd May 2012 12:04am |
|
Bellini Member Since: 11 Jan 2012 Location: Berkshire Posts: 2261 |
I drive the 4.4 petrol V8 and really love it.
|
||
2nd May 2012 5:23am |
|
fisha Member Since: 25 Sep 2009 Location: Scotland Posts: 1350 |
I have the 4.4 petrol.
|
||
2nd May 2012 5:55am |
|
hollidaysc Member Since: 08 Mar 2012 Location: Warwickshire Posts: 2 |
When I bought my V8 petrol car last year, the cost differential between petrol and a V8 diesel was approx £10K and all that was available were leggy early ones (I discounted the 6 cyclinder diesel, fantastic in my 2 tonne 5 series, too slow in a 3 tonne FFRR). OK, running a vehicle with an average 18mpg is a little heartstopping, but a V8D will do approx 24mpg so they're not that much more economical and £10k is a good chunk of money to hang onto (or spend on running repairs/servicing).
|
||
2nd May 2012 6:24am |
|
piecost76 Member Since: 19 Jul 2010 Location: Nr Sevenoaks, Kent Posts: 296 |
I can speak with some recent experience here.
|
||
2nd May 2012 7:25am |
|
JOKER Member Since: 11 Sep 2008 Location: Sconnie Botland Posts: 15876 |
I've had the TD6 , the SC and now have the TDV8 , me I would go back for the SC .... |
||
2nd May 2012 7:39am |
|
Gazellio @ Prestige Cars Member Since: 22 Jan 2010 Location: Chilterns, UK Posts: 11309 |
I think your being a bit optimistic re a good TD6.
|
||
2nd May 2012 8:07am |
|
Restless Member Since: 04 Apr 2012 Location: UK Posts: 36 |
Thanks for the different views.
|
||
2nd May 2012 8:47am |
|
TheAllSeeingPie Member Since: 18 Apr 2012 Location: Leeds Posts: 848 |
I picked a SC as a similar spec TDV8 with same miles / condition was a good 6-8k more. Even doing 20k miles a year a SC will use £2500 more fuel than a TDV8, so it'd take a while to break even (I've assumed 17mpg for SC and 25mpg for TDV8 for mainly motorway chugging). |
||
2nd May 2012 8:58am |
|
Stephen.Gazard Member Since: 10 Apr 2012 Location: Bristol Posts: 192 |
Speaking from experience the 3.6 TDV8 is a great machine ...
|
||
2nd May 2012 9:39am |
|
mjdronfield Member Since: 04 Nov 2011 Location: Derbyshire Posts: 7794 |
Well I run a Td6...........had a 3.9 V8 petrol in a RR Classic, and you could go to places, but you'd have to save up to come back !! Never again. Just my 2p.
|
||
2nd May 2012 9:42am |
|
Restless Member Since: 04 Apr 2012 Location: UK Posts: 36 |
I don't think I would be 100% against a TD6 as long as it had the gearbox done already, the TDV8 is unquestionably a better car and has the benifit of the newer interior too, it's just wether to spend the extra on one or not as I do a fair bit of town driving so not sure if I would really see the benifit of the extra power, I would also like to do some green laning in it too so I wouldn't be as concerned with a cheaper one.
|
||
2nd May 2012 10:32am |
|
mjdronfield Member Since: 04 Nov 2011 Location: Derbyshire Posts: 7794 |
Mine is going to JE Engineering tomorrow afternoon......
|
||
2nd May 2012 10:37am |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis