Home > General > 5.0 , 3.6 or 4.4 What would you choose |
|
|
Emperor Mong Member Since: 07 Jul 2010 Location: London Posts: 1435 |
Really? Only 400 miles? I'm getting almost that out of a tank on my 4.2 S/C. To be fair, I've only managed 400 miles once but 320+ is quite easy. I was thinking that I'd be getting 500+ out of a tank of DERV on a 4.4. Might have to buy a 5.0 after all if the difference is that little. I have been in the camp of not enjoying the time spent filling the tank, so had been thinking of a move to an oil burner. |
||
15th May 2011 2:59pm |
|
stan Site Moderator Member Since: 13 Jul 2010 Location: a moderate moderated moderator moderating moderately in moderation Posts: 35248 |
matt has said 4.4 petrol mr mong, not a diesel... |
||
15th May 2011 3:31pm |
|
JOKER Member Since: 11 Sep 2008 Location: Sconnie Botland Posts: 15876 |
I think i would fancy the Diesel for a change , just to have the FBH for the winter ,,,
|
||
15th May 2011 4:29pm |
|
Rolo Member Since: 11 May 2011 Location: UK Posts: 852 |
Diesel for me, most likely the newest you can get, but you have to ask yourself why has someone gotten rid of that 4.4 after only 2,700 miles ?
|
||
15th May 2011 4:37pm |
|
CSK Member Since: 15 Oct 2010 Location: St Tropez Posts: 750 |
As I said before you don't have to buy the 5L Supercharged for the performance as I think the 4.4L TDV8 has sufficient performance and torque but I think the 5L is more refined than the Diesel no contest. |
||
15th May 2011 4:45pm |
|
JOKER Member Since: 11 Sep 2008 Location: Sconnie Botland Posts: 15876 |
Think the 4.4 tdv8 is their Demo car |
||
15th May 2011 4:58pm |
|
johnson1 Member Since: 30 Aug 2010 Location: South West Posts: 519 |
Have come from a BMW with a sub-5 second 0-62 and the 4.4 doesn't feel slow at all. Especially when you compare the 27.8 urban mpg vs 17! |
||
15th May 2011 5:07pm |
|
Gazellio @ Prestige Cars Member Since: 22 Jan 2010 Location: Chilterns, UK Posts: 11309 |
I think you can spec the FBH on the 5.0.... |
||
15th May 2011 5:19pm |
|
Fox Member Since: 02 Apr 2010 Location: Essex Posts: 2313 |
Yes, and it's only about a grand I believe. I'm surprised they don't just fit as standard. |
||
15th May 2011 7:02pm |
|
BigJ Member Since: 16 Mar 2011 Location: North Yorkshire Posts: 247 |
Personally I love the 5.0 Supercharger...
|
||
17th May 2011 7:00am |
|
Pantherman Member Since: 02 Sep 2011 Location: North Essex Posts: 2 |
Is the 3.6 really that bad? |
||
2nd Sep 2011 1:02pm |
|
Gazellio @ Prestige Cars Member Since: 22 Jan 2010 Location: Chilterns, UK Posts: 11309 |
Its a great engine, definitely one of the best. Its just the 4.4 is even better! |
||
2nd Sep 2011 1:06pm |
|
kingpleb Member Since: 07 Jun 2011 Location: Maybe here. Maybe there, I get everywhere! Posts: 8455 |
And there is the biggest problem, buy the petrol and spend lots of tie you SHOULD be enjoying the FFRR, stood at the pumps and when its chucking it down and freezing are you really wanting to do that so much, especially as you have to hold the f'in nozzle in place and trigger due to H&S gone mad in this country....
|
||
2nd Sep 2011 3:35pm |
|
Gazellio @ Prestige Cars Member Since: 22 Jan 2010 Location: Chilterns, UK Posts: 11309 |
Personally I would opt for the 5.0l as you can spend the time filling up admiring the car. A Supercharged just gives more satisfaction when driving (smile factor) The fuel cost is irrelevant if you can afford to buy and depreciate a new Range Rover. |
||
2nd Sep 2011 3:49pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis