Advertise on fullfatrr.com »

Home > General > 5.0 , 3.6 or 4.4 What would you choose
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 2 of 4 <1234>
Print this entire topic · 
RRUK
Site Supporter


Member Since: 08 Jun 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 6366

United Kingdom 2019 Range Rover Vogue SE SDV8 Santorini Black

For me it would be the 4.4.

The SC is nice etc but I got so sick of filling mine up every 250 miles, i was literally filling up daily sometimes.

The 3.6 is the same Price but the oldest model effectively so that would be third choice for me.

1. 4.4
2. 5.0
3. 3.6 Discovery 4 HSE
1998 110 TUM HS FFR Hard Top XD WOLF
1982 Series 3 Hard Top

*Gone:L462 D5 HSE LUX, L663 Defender 110 HSE, Discovery 3 HSE, 2014MY Range Rover Sport 5.0 Supercharged AB Dynamic; L405 Exec Vogue SE 4.4, 5.0 Supercharged Autobiography, Defender TDCi XS CSW, Defender TD5 HT, Vogue SE TDV8, Vogue TD6, RRSport SC 4.2V8, Classic 3.9 Vogue Auto, Land Rover Series 3 SWB

Post #63927 14th May 2011 12:08pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Java Jungle



Member Since: 22 Mar 2010
Location: Monte-Carlo
Posts: 420

Monaco 2011 Range Rover Autobiography 4.4 V8 Nara Bronze

Fox wrote:
Give me the diesel, I don't want to spend half my life filling it up.


All the way with you "Fox" Thumbs Up

JJ

Post #63930 14th May 2011 1:12pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
stan
Site Moderator


Member Since: 13 Jul 2010
Location: a moderate moderated moderator moderating moderately in moderation
Posts: 35248

United Kingdom 

mattstevenson2005 wrote:
scarey wrote:
not a lot in it mind..

5 litre...
0 to 62 mph (secs): 6.2
Badge Power: 510
Engine Power - BHP: 510
Engine Power - KW: 375
Engine Power - PS: Yes
Engine Power - RPM: 6000
Engine Torque - LBS.FT: 461
Engine Torque - MKG: 64
Engine Torque - NM: 625
Engine Torque - RPM: 2500
Top Speed: 140


The 5.0 supercharged is 0-60 in 5.9 seconds not 6.2

Matt


0-62mph is 6.2 secs matt...

Post #63937 14th May 2011 2:10pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Gazellio @ Prestige Cars



Member Since: 22 Jan 2010
Location: Chilterns, UK
Posts: 11309

United Kingdom 2010 Range Rover SE Td6 Zermatt Silver

scarey wrote:
not a lot in it mind..

5 litre...
0 to 62 mph (secs): 6.2
Badge Power: 510
Engine Power - BHP: 510
Engine Power - KW: 375
Engine Power - PS: Yes
Engine Power - RPM: 6000
Engine Torque - LBS.FT: 461
Engine Torque - MKG: 64
Engine Torque - NM: 625
Engine Torque - RPM: 2500
Top Speed: 140


4.4 ....
0 to 62 mph (secs): 7.5
Badge Power: 313
Engine Power - BHP: 313
Engine Power - KW: 230
Engine Power - PS: Yes
engine Power - RPM: 3750
Engine Torque - LBS.FT: 516
Engine Torque - MKG: 71
Engine Torque - NM: 700
Top Speed: 130


Only a 197 galloping horses...... Whistle

Post #63939 14th May 2011 2:15pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Baben



Member Since: 17 Oct 2010
Location: Kyalami
Posts: 165

South Africa 2014 Range Rover Autobiography SDV8 Luxor

If the supercharger whines there is a problem.

Either the 4.4 TDV8 or the 5.0 sc. Both are great. I'm sure my 5.0 does 0-100kmh in 5.0 Smile

Post #63947 14th May 2011 4:11pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Katash



Member Since: 10 Apr 2011
Location: Hereford
Posts: 700

England 2007 Range Rover Supercharged 4.2 SC V8 Zermatt Silver

If I had the money to buy any of those I wouldn't care about the fuel efficiency ....

..... So 5.0SC it would be then, 19mpg is still better than the 17mpg from the 4.4 V8 I'm planning on getting soon anyway.

Post #63951 14th May 2011 5:24pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
bozmandb9



Member Since: 06 Dec 2010
Location: Wallingford, Oxfordshire
Posts: 1020

Katash wrote:
If I had the money to buy any of those I wouldn't care about the fuel efficiency ....

..... So 5.0SC it would be then, 19mpg is still better than the 17mpg from the 4.4 V8 I'm planning on getting soon anyway.


Believe me you would, it's not just the cost, more the range, as said earlier, it can be really boring to have to stop every 250 miles! I filled up twice on Friday! Fortunately with LPG, so cost wasn't a bother, but it's still very tedious standing at the pump so frequently! The only saving grace with the LPG is that you're always consicous that you're paying half price, which takes the sting out of it nicely.

Also, with the LPG, I can have a Range of 500 miles easily by using both LPG and Petrol, sorry, going OT.... Range Rover-less at the moment - Pining!

Post #63952 14th May 2011 5:35pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
CSK



Member Since: 15 Oct 2010
Location: St Tropez
Posts: 750

France 2013 Range Rover Autobiography 5.0 SC V8 Causeway Grey

I've driven all three and I vote for the 5L Supercharged not so much for the performance which the 4.4L TDV8 has plenty of but it beats the diesel for refinement.
I'm saving for the 5L so impressed I was, I'm getting there!

Post #63953 14th May 2011 5:36pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
mattstevenson2005



Member Since: 01 Jan 2011
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 737

United Kingdom 2003 Range Rover Autobiography 4.4 V8 Java Black

bozmandb9 wrote:
Katash wrote:
If I had the money to buy any of those I wouldn't care about the fuel efficiency ....

..... So 5.0SC it would be then, 19mpg is still better than the 17mpg from the 4.4 V8 I'm planning on getting soon anyway.


Believe me you would, it's not just the cost, more the range, as said earlier, it can be really boring to have to stop every 250 miles! I filled up twice on Friday! Fortunately with LPG, so cost wasn't a bother, but it's still very tedious standing at the pump so frequently! The only saving grace with the LPG is that you're always consicous that you're paying half price, which takes the sting out of it nicely.

Also, with the LPG, I can have a Range of 500 miles easily by using both LPG and Petrol, sorry, going OT....


You must have been really hammering it to only get 250 miles put of a 100 litre tank!! I can get around 400 miles out of my 4.4 v8 petrol when I fill the tank to the brim

Matt

Post #63962 14th May 2011 7:47pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
mattstevenson2005



Member Since: 01 Jan 2011
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 737

United Kingdom 2003 Range Rover Autobiography 4.4 V8 Java Black

scarey wrote:
mattstevenson2005 wrote:
scarey wrote:
not a lot in it mind..

5 litre...
0 to 62 mph (secs): 6.2
Badge Power: 510
Engine Power - BHP: 510
Engine Power - KW: 375
Engine Power - PS: Yes
Engine Power - RPM: 6000
Engine Torque - LBS.FT: 461
Engine Torque - MKG: 64
Engine Torque - NM: 625
Engine Torque - RPM: 2500
Top Speed: 140


The 5.0 supercharged is 0-60 in 5.9 seconds not 6.2

Matt


0-62mph is 6.2 secs matt...

Post #63963 14th May 2011 7:51pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
BRUNBERG



Member Since: 13 May 2011
Location: Surrey
Posts: 37

United Kingdom 2006 Range Rover Vogue SE Supercharged Bonatti Grey

5.0 SC for me. As stated if anyone finds themselves considering a new one, knowing full well what the depreciation and general running costs are then fuel bills are a minor IMO

Post #63967 14th May 2011 8:01pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Gazellio @ Prestige Cars



Member Since: 22 Jan 2010
Location: Chilterns, UK
Posts: 11309

United Kingdom 2010 Range Rover SE Td6 Zermatt Silver

BRUNBERG wrote:
5.0 SC for me. As stated if anyone finds themselves considering a new one, knowing full well what the depreciation and general running costs are then fuel bills are a minor IMO


Exactly we are talking NEW so fuel/mpg is not the issue here.... Rolling Eyes

Post #63993 14th May 2011 10:41pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Fox



Member Since: 02 Apr 2010
Location: Essex
Posts: 2313

United Kingdom 

Some people don't like having to stop several times a week and spend ages filling it up though.

It's not about the cost, it's about freezing your t*ts off every couple of days because you can't drive for more than 4 hours without running out of fuel. Laughing

Post #64029 15th May 2011 2:09pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
bozmandb9



Member Since: 06 Dec 2010
Location: Wallingford, Oxfordshire
Posts: 1020

mattstevenson2005 wrote:
bozmandb9 wrote:
Katash wrote:
If I had the money to buy any of those I wouldn't care about the fuel efficiency ....

..... So 5.0SC it would be then, 19mpg is still better than the 17mpg from the 4.4 V8 I'm planning on getting soon anyway.


Believe me you would, it's not just the cost, more the range, as said earlier, it can be really boring to have to stop every 250 miles! I filled up twice on Friday! Fortunately with LPG, so cost wasn't a bother, but it's still very tedious standing at the pump so frequently! The only saving grace with the LPG is that you're always consicous that you're paying half price, which takes the sting out of it nicely.

Also, with the LPG, I can have a Range of 500 miles easily by using both LPG and Petrol, sorry, going OT....


You must have been really hammering it to only get 250 miles put of a 100 litre tank!! I can get around 400 miles out of my 4.4 v8 petrol when I fill the tank to the brim

Matt


You're right, I was being very conservative. I usually refuel on petrol between 250-300 miles, but then I'm only putting maybe up to £100 in, so it's far from a full tank. The S/C gives me around 16.5mpg overall. Range Rover-less at the moment - Pining!

Post #64031 15th May 2011 2:17pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
CSK



Member Since: 15 Oct 2010
Location: St Tropez
Posts: 750

France 2013 Range Rover Autobiography 5.0 SC V8 Causeway Grey

Fox wrote:
Some people don't like having to stop several times a week and spend ages filling it up though.

It's not about the cost, it's about freezing your t*ts off every couple of days because you can't drive for more than 4 hours without running out of fuel. Laughing


If you're too lazy to fill it up, I can understand you prefer Diesel.
Petrolheads will find that driving the 5L Supercharged is worth the extra effort and cost of filling it up though.
I'm in the process of converting myself also.

Post #64034 15th May 2011 2:43pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 2 of 4 <1234>
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
fullfatrr.com RSS Feed - All Forums


Switch to Mobile site