I’m a strong advocate of regular transmission fluid changes and filter replacement but only if the correct fluid and filters are used. If someone was going to use an inventory-reduction fluid and a pattern-part filter to save money then I’d suggest the transmission would be better off left alone.
A generic ATF may satisfy the viscosity, flash point, anti-foaming, chemical compatibility, oxidation, wear, etc., etc. requirements of the transmission but its friction modifiers are unknown, possibly with entirely different static/dynamic characteristics than the fluid around which the transmission and its control system was originally developed, which may lead to increased/reduced clutch slip. The transmission then has to reset its adaptions to adjust the shift times/clutch energies and there are limits to this. It’s not uncommon to hear of fluid flushes plus adaption resets resulting in a trashed transmission due to the clutches burning out as the control system struggles (unsuccessfully) to adjust.
We all have our own views on Land Rover’s ‘Lifetime Fill’ and ZF’s recommended fluid change intervals for their transmissions but it’s clear that, when this was specified, what wasn’t known were the problems that the ’02 – ’05 models would have with their fluid cooling system and that, as a result, the fluid would often be operating at higher temperatures than originally envisaged. The resulting increase in the rate of oxidation of the fluid massively reduces its life.
Phil
|