Advertise on fullfatrr.com »

Home > General > TDV8 3.6 or 4.4
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 4 of 5 <12345>
Print this entire topic · 
Localizer



Member Since: 26 Jun 2011
Location: Kent
Posts: 37

United Kingdom 2011 Range Rover Vogue TDV8 Santorini Black

johnson1 wrote:
I currently average around 28mpg combined. During motorway journeys I can get as high as 34mpg. Urban I haven't seen it dip below 25mpg.


......... Pretty much the same for me. I think it is better than my old D3.

Post #72217 13th Jul 2011 10:56am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Fox



Member Since: 02 Apr 2010
Location: Essex
Posts: 2313

United Kingdom 

Seems to be about 5mpg up on the 3.6 TDV8, which was what Land Rover claimed. Thumbs Up
Amazing really when you consider the weight and power.

Post #72218 13th Jul 2011 11:05am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
johnson1



Member Since: 30 Aug 2010
Location: South West
Posts: 519

United Kingdom 2011 Range Rover Autobiography TDV8 Santorini Black

I know, awesome. 3.6TDV8 was and still is an excellent engine when you take into things like size and weight as you say.

Post #72219 13th Jul 2011 11:09am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
KurtVerbose



Member Since: 08 Aug 2010
Location: Les Arses
Posts: 5848

Switzerland 2007 Range Rover Vogue TDV8 Stornoway Grey

Fox wrote:
Seems to be about 5mpg up on the 3.6 TDV8, which was what Land Rover claimed. Thumbs Up
Amazing really when you consider the weight and power.


I reckon that the L405 will be 5mpg at least up on that. 30 around town and 40 on a run. Just my guess.

Post #72433 14th Jul 2011 9:02pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Fox



Member Since: 02 Apr 2010
Location: Essex
Posts: 2313

United Kingdom 

KurtVerbose wrote:
Fox wrote:
Seems to be about 5mpg up on the 3.6 TDV8, which was what Land Rover claimed. Thumbs Up
Amazing really when you consider the weight and power.


I reckon that the L405 will be 5mpg at least up on that. 30 around town and 40 on a run. Just my guess.


I think you are right.
Shaving 400 to 500kg off the weight alone will make a big difference. Plus it'll probably get a stop-start system.

Post #72468 15th Jul 2011 8:06am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
tboner001



Member Since: 22 Jan 2011
Location: Bucks
Posts: 691

England 2014 Range Rover Autobiography SDV8 Fuji White

Came back from Northern Holland to Calais last week , average was 68MPH over 265 miles so you can guess i was not hanging about , was amazed the 4.4 returned 28MPG at worst it has just got better and better now its up to 4k on the clock Bow down Far to many gone...

Post #72548 15th Jul 2011 3:00pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
jollymuckshifter



Member Since: 03 Sep 2010
Location: Chester le Street
Posts: 24

2010 Range Rover Vogue 4.4 V8 Baltic Blue

My previous Range Rover was a 3.6TDV8 is was doing 21.8 MPG.My 4.4 TDV8 has now covered 16,500 miles and has so far returned 22.8 MPG this is lower than I was expecting.Agree with what many have said on here in terms of the performance though,considering the size of the vehicle it really is a revelation.My father runs a 4.0d X5 and whislt the stats suggest it to be a very fast jeep it really doesn't (to me) feel any slower than the Range Rover.

Post #72552 15th Jul 2011 3:46pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
KurtVerbose



Member Since: 08 Aug 2010
Location: Les Arses
Posts: 5848

Switzerland 2007 Range Rover Vogue TDV8 Stornoway Grey

jollymuckshifter wrote:
My father runs a 4.0d X5 and whislt the stats suggest it to be a very fast jeep it really doesn't (to me) feel any slower than the Range Rover.


Neither are Jeeps.

Or trucks.

Post #72687 16th Jul 2011 8:23pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
jollymuckshifter



Member Since: 03 Sep 2010
Location: Chester le Street
Posts: 24

2010 Range Rover Vogue 4.4 V8 Baltic Blue

Not sure what point you're making there,perhaps you can clarify?

Post #72807 18th Jul 2011 1:22pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Fox



Member Since: 02 Apr 2010
Location: Essex
Posts: 2313

United Kingdom 

I think he is cheesed off with people refering to 4x4s of any specific make as "jeeps".
A Jeep is not a 4x4, although a lot of people think so...

Post #72812 18th Jul 2011 1:53pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
iancollins



Member Since: 17 Mar 2010
Location: milton keynes
Posts: 264

England 2016 Range Rover Vogue SDV6 Causeway Grey

and the new 4.4 tdv8 sounds awsome Very Happy

Post #72814 18th Jul 2011 1:59pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
jollymuckshifter



Member Since: 03 Sep 2010
Location: Chester le Street
Posts: 24

2010 Range Rover Vogue 4.4 V8 Baltic Blue

jollymuckshifter wrote:
Not sure what point you're making there,perhaps you can clarify?

Thanks for the heads up.

Post #72855 18th Jul 2011 6:53pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
KurtVerbose



Member Since: 08 Aug 2010
Location: Les Arses
Posts: 5848

Switzerland 2007 Range Rover Vogue TDV8 Stornoway Grey

jollymuckshifter wrote:
jollymuckshifter wrote:
Not sure what point you're making there,perhaps you can clarify?

Thanks for the heads up.


Sorry, didn't mean to appear tw@ish, just I drive a Range Rover not a jeep, and it's not a truck, although it can sometimes appear truck like. Laughing

Just my pedantry.

Post #72894 19th Jul 2011 6:34am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
tboner001



Member Since: 22 Jan 2011
Location: Bucks
Posts: 691

England 2014 Range Rover Autobiography SDV8 Fuji White

My 4.4 ave is 25 Town and 29 mway at 80+ and 30+ mixed Did not buy it for the great fuel consumption it was all about the torque and the way it drives Bow down

My 3.6 RRS does 20 Town and 25 Run ( on a good day )

My 3.SDV6 disco 4 Commercial is doing 27 Town and 32 run far less grunt and a far lighter motor.

Got to say i think the 4.4 is a revelation in the FFRR to be honest Thumbs Up Far to many gone...

Post #72898 19th Jul 2011 7:58am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
wackyjim



Member Since: 11 Aug 2010
Location: Brigadoon
Posts: 2014

Scotland 2011 Range Rover SE TDV8 Santorini Black

tboner001 wrote:


Got to say i think the 4.4 is a revelation in the FFRR to be honest Thumbs Up



Agreed!!! Thumbs Up

Post #72900 19th Jul 2011 8:07am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 4 of 5 <12345>
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
fullfatrr.com RSS Feed - All Forums


Switch to Mobile site