Home > General > L322 vs L405 (again no doubt) |
|
|
jim4244 Member Since: 31 May 2012 Location: UK Posts: 853 |
I think that the shape of the L322 is the closest of any that take the design back to the Classic Range Rover look.
|
||
15th Jan 2021 7:10am |
|
Cam-Tech-Craig Member Since: 03 Aug 2011 Location: Gloucestershire Posts: 16280 |
Couldn't agree more with verydisco... The L405 is a better car but the 4.4TDV8/5.0 L322 is a better Range Rover |
||
16th Jan 2021 1:26am |
|
Discotigger Member Since: 12 Feb 2013 Location: Cumbria Posts: 804 |
I just wish I could have the new L405 body on my L322 4.4TDV8, bit like a wolf in sheep's clothing!! |
||
16th Jan 2021 3:59am |
|
northernmonkeyjones Member Since: 24 Mar 2012 Location: derby Posts: 8500 |
If they did a “new” version of the 322 I would have one. Ie if the newest one wasnt now 8 years old. If I could get a 3 year old 322 then I would have one in a shot, and in preference to the 405.
|
||
17th Jan 2021 5:22pm |
|
Tinman Member Since: 22 Mar 2017 Location: kent Posts: 1185 |
I sold my 2011 se and regretted it from the moment I saw it go down the road.
|
||
17th Jan 2021 6:46pm |
|
stablemate Member Since: 16 Sep 2020 Location: Lincolnshire Posts: 32 |
Coming from a long line of RR's, both L322's and L405's all I can do is echo some of the comments above. The L405 is a far superior car in pretty much every measurable way, but it always feels like less of an event than the L322. True that event was usually a breakdown, but it was a nice place to wait for the recovery services! - Corris Grey 2017 Range Rover Autobiography SDV8
|
||
18th Jan 2021 8:22pm |
|
Goodfella Member Since: 04 Jun 2017 Location: Essex Posts: 73 |
How would a newer body with a less powerful engine (TDV8 vs SDV8) be a wolf in sheep’s clothing? Or have you got some crazy power upgrades on yours? |
||
23rd Jan 2021 10:49am |
|
kevinp Member Since: 28 Sep 2019 Location: Telford Posts: 1205 |
|
||
23rd Jan 2021 11:32am |
|
Range Rover L322 Member Since: 03 Sep 2019 Location: South West Posts: 329 |
deleted by author. 2012 L322 4.4 TDV8 AB low mileage - a peach
|
||
31st Dec 2022 2:15pm |
|
Red Merle Member Since: 19 Sep 2016 Location: Cornwall Posts: 2158 |
Very interesting comparison.
|
||
31st Dec 2022 3:06pm |
|
Goodfella Member Since: 04 Jun 2017 Location: Essex Posts: 73 |
Just a couple of things to add to the above..
|
||
1st Jan 2023 8:43am |
|
Range Rover L322 Member Since: 03 Sep 2019 Location: South West Posts: 329 |
deleted by author 2012 L322 4.4 TDV8 AB low mileage - a peach
|
||
1st Jan 2023 12:26pm |
|
fisha Member Since: 25 Sep 2009 Location: Scotland Posts: 1349 |
its funny, I’ve always liked the original versions of each of the marks. For example, the 2002-2005 L322, and the original look of the L405 before they changed to the angular headlights. The later styles of each being too fussy.
|
||
1st Jan 2023 10:04pm |
|
Proftinkerpot Member Since: 22 Dec 2022 Location: County Antrim Posts: 178 |
I looked at L405's but I kept seeing L322's and preferring the shape. So much so I just bought a 2012 Westminster with under 54k miles and I love it. The equivalent L405 would have been more than double the money which I couldn't justify as a second car as I wanted to keep my other car. The only criticism I could make of the L322 is the dated infotainment system but I knew that when I bought the car. I don't see the need for an electrically operated tailgate or electrically folded seats and I don't get touch screens which are becoming more and more prevalent in every new car. There is something about buttons you can push and dials you can turn. I think those screens will cause today's models to date faster and be less desirable as used buys in the future as they will give trouble. A good L322 is a superb value proposition if you get a clean one. |
||
13th Jan 2023 9:13pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis