Home > General (L405) > Low miler l322 or L405 |
|
|
|
JAYBOY Member Since: 17 Oct 2012 Location: South Wales Posts: 2204 |
It's your choice my man but if you buy the 405 you are going to lose 20K if you buy the 322 you will lose 20k but not as fast and it depends on how long you intend keeping it.
|
||
12th Jan 2017 8:43pm |
|
362bkr Member Since: 15 Oct 2014 Location: Devon Posts: 679 |
If it's all about loosing money then buy a Kia for a few grand BUT if it's about living the dream get the 405 ! |
||
12th Jan 2017 8:58pm |
|
Rob99 Member Since: 03 May 2016 Location: Gatwick Posts: 1425 |
I doubt if anyone buys a used FFRR based on depreciation.
|
||
12th Jan 2017 9:19pm |
|
mzplcg Member Since: 26 May 2010 Location: Warwickshire. England. The Commonwealth. Posts: 4029 |
YOLO. Have both |
||
12th Jan 2017 9:50pm |
|
ajac8 Member Since: 04 Oct 2011 Location: Shakespeares County Posts: 1655 |
Correct spec 405 any day. Dont think of the loss you might have - think of the joy you will definitely will have. 405 AB exec seats Baltic and Cirrus
|
||
12th Jan 2017 10:49pm |
|
Basilfawlty Member Since: 18 Oct 2015 Location: Cheshire Posts: 655 |
We are all a long time dead.....so enjoy to the max. My guess is you'd lose a little more on the newer car as it has further to fall but in the scheme of things not that much. Both are nice cars but the 405 is miles better than the old one. Just buy from a dealer and get the 2 year warranty if you can afford. |
||
12th Jan 2017 11:05pm |
|
Rich86 Member Since: 10 Mar 2013 Location: Surrey Posts: 509 |
I'm a traditionalist and prefer the 322 for the time being. No doubt in time when the new shape grows on me I will eventually change bit no immediate plans at all.
|
||
13th Jan 2017 6:01am |
|
XXXAngelXXX Member Since: 25 Mar 2007 Location: Stuttgart Posts: 4994 |
L 405 any day over a L322 - mine lost in 1,5 year only 2k Euros All my spelling errorz are belong to me!
|
||
13th Jan 2017 7:41am |
|
w8pmc Member Since: 30 Oct 2016 Location: West Lancashire Posts: 229 |
I'd agree in that the 405 is probably the better option & doubt much of a difference between the 2 in ongoing depreciation.
|
||
13th Jan 2017 8:37am |
|
jimbob1972 Member Since: 03 Apr 2012 Location: new forest Posts: 11 |
Rich86 makes a good point re cars being looked after but that is the issue I have. My 07 tdv8 has been looked after very well indeed which is why I want to swap! At 118k miles I'm having too many issues that whilst I fix them, mean that my wife is without her car for 4 or 5 weeks of the year as the problems come up. This year I have had broken radiator, rusted brake lines, fuel sensor failure and now front drive shaft and cv need doing. Whoever gets the car will have a nice one but I am leaning toward the L405 now, probably the 4.4. |
||
13th Jan 2017 9:25am |
|
Emperor Mong Member Since: 07 Jul 2010 Location: London Posts: 1435 |
The L322 has to lose less money - it costs less to begin with.
|
||
13th Jan 2017 11:40am |
|
CS Member Since: 14 Apr 2015 Location: Edinburgh Posts: 1385 |
The 405 will give you more modern looks and greater performance and refinement. You will avoid wondering if you could have done better. For about £50,000 you might find few 4.4s and if you are restricted to the 3.0 V6 then there is the background of numerous engine seizures (see threads elsewhere on here) which would put me off. Some older 405s can be a bit scruffy.
|
||
13th Jan 2017 12:59pm |
|
verydisco Member Since: 10 Dec 2009 Location: UK/US Posts: 2952 |
^^^+1
|
||
13th Jan 2017 1:19pm |
|
Rich86 Member Since: 10 Mar 2013 Location: Surrey Posts: 509 |
Whatever you eventually decide on it will be a compromise as is always the case.
|
||
13th Jan 2017 2:55pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis