Home > Technical (L322) > TD6 Torque converter, is there an H/D option? |
|
|
kingpleb Member Since: 07 Jun 2011 Location: Maybe here. Maybe there, I get everywhere! Posts: 8455 |
They seem well related as tyres from most that ive spoke to about them but ive just got some wintracs on the way as I haven't found anything better yet when the weather comes in and I do like to play in the snow 😂
|
||
31st Jan 2016 6:19pm |
|
RRPhil Member Since: 22 Aug 2011 Location: Blackburn, Lancashire Posts: 962 |
I never really understood by Land Rover/BMW went with the 5L40-E unit because the ZF 5HP24 is used in the BMW 730d (with the M57 engine) and even the twin-turbo 238bhp/500Nm Alpina D10. Maybe the GM box was cheaper? |
||
1st Feb 2016 12:26pm |
|
kingpleb Member Since: 07 Jun 2011 Location: Maybe here. Maybe there, I get everywhere! Posts: 8455 |
Was it not cost and that they were already tied into getting the power train from BMW?
|
||
1st Feb 2016 12:40pm |
|
miggit Member Since: 12 Jul 2014 Location: Milton Keynes Posts: 3657 |
Phil
|
||
1st Feb 2016 3:36pm |
|
boatsandy1966 Member Since: 05 Dec 2015 Location: nr pagelsham essex Posts: 162 |
what is expensive if you like the car spend and keep it id be looking at the aussie option tbh 1937 model y hot rod 1000bhp rover75 v8 vincert blackshadow plus several boats and other toyz ! ford f150 raptor Mercedes e class convertible jaguar f pace |
||
1st Feb 2016 5:42pm |
|
miggit Member Since: 12 Jul 2014 Location: Milton Keynes Posts: 3657 |
Unfortunately the car is not just for liking, it's a business tool as well, and with out it I can't work
|
||
1st Feb 2016 7:43pm |
|
kingpleb Member Since: 07 Jun 2011 Location: Maybe here. Maybe there, I get everywhere! Posts: 8455 |
If you can do the work yourself here's a possible fix scenario....
|
||
1st Feb 2016 8:42pm |
|
kingpleb Member Since: 07 Jun 2011 Location: Maybe here. Maybe there, I get everywhere! Posts: 8455 |
These links might help...
|
||
1st Feb 2016 8:52pm |
|
RRPhil Member Since: 22 Aug 2011 Location: Blackburn, Lancashire Posts: 962 |
To be honest I don’t think there’s a lot wrong with the existing torque converter. I believe the LUC friction lining is woven graphite/carbon (rather than paper/resin) and would probably turn out to be pretty durable if it wasn’t for the valve body wear issues. The problem is that transmission remanufacturers address the symptoms and not the cause (it’s the cheapest method). The valve body wears due to the soft aluminium castings, the spools then leak and cross-talk. The leakage causes the LUC pressure to reduce causing it to slip more and eventually wear out. The remanufacturer then replaces the torque converter without addressing the valve body leakage issue and the whole process begins again - except quicker now as the valve body is ‘pre-worn’ - and this time the TC lasts 20-30k miles. All the remanufacturer cares about is that it’s outside the warranty period.
|
||||||
1st Feb 2016 9:04pm |
|
Ian c2 Member Since: 19 May 2015 Location: Socal Posts: 217 |
Does the same thing apply with the 6-speed Phil ? |
||
2nd Feb 2016 2:09am |
|
Lost for Words Member Since: 18 Jun 2015 Location: Warminster, Wiltshire Posts: 473 |
The 6-speed doesn't have the underlying valve block issues of the GM box. Visiting from DISCO3.CO.UK
|
||
2nd Feb 2016 10:06am |
|
miggit Member Since: 12 Jul 2014 Location: Milton Keynes Posts: 3657 |
Well I've just had the quote from Aus. and .......
|
||
2nd Feb 2016 11:58pm |
|
axle Member Since: 28 Oct 2007 Location: Perth Perth the end of the Earth Posts: 2964 |
Can't talk about gear boxes but as a boat builder I know my Carbon Fibre from my Kevlar aramid fibre and they are VERY different and Kevlar is far superior in abrasion resistance to Carbon . 2008 MY Supercharged
|
||
3rd Feb 2016 1:32am |
|
miggit Member Since: 12 Jul 2014 Location: Milton Keynes Posts: 3657 |
That's what I thought, but it was saying that carbon fiber was better at torque transfer, and that was the point were I got lost
|
||
3rd Feb 2016 2:33am |
|
Lost for Words Member Since: 18 Jun 2015 Location: Warminster, Wiltshire Posts: 473 |
I think I'm right in saying that Kevlar is stronger, while carbon fibre, I believe, has a higher friction coefficient, but I'm not an expert. Kevlar doesn't like heat IIRC, so I think I'd be inclined towards carbon. Visiting from DISCO3.CO.UK
|
||
3rd Feb 2016 9:52am |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis