Home > Off Topic > With all the fuss about diesel, return to petrol engines? |
|
|
Lost for Words Member Since: 18 Jun 2015 Location: Warminster, Wiltshire Posts: 473 |
Even if electric vehicles can really overcome their issues, I'm confident that my ideal alternative fuel vehicle will remain a hydrogen one. What I want is a hydrogen-fuelled (or even multi-fuelled), combined cycle, gas turbine engine coupled with an IVT comprising of a rotary, variable displacement, hydraulic pump and a rotary, hydraulic motor. Build me that and I'll buy it... Visiting from DISCO3.CO.UK
|
||
1st Oct 2015 8:35am |
|
Lost for Words Member Since: 18 Jun 2015 Location: Warminster, Wiltshire Posts: 473 |
Eh? Visiting from DISCO3.CO.UK
|
||
1st Oct 2015 3:39pm |
|
miggit Member Since: 12 Jul 2014 Location: Milton Keynes Posts: 3657 |
I don't think that either a gas turbine or hydraulic motor are very eco friendly, from an MPG point of view. Lots of grunt, but lots of fuel to provide that power If your going to do that then you might as well stick with a hurdy great V8 and run it on 5 star Vodka Added bonus that if it was to breakdown in the middle of nowhere you wouldn't have far to go to find a drink, and you wouldn't have a care in the world either Yesterday I couldn't spell Engineer... Today I are one!
|
||
1st Oct 2015 10:38pm |
|
Lost for Words Member Since: 18 Jun 2015 Location: Warminster, Wiltshire Posts: 473 |
A gas turbine can be very efficient as part of a combined cycle (the thermal efficiency is better than that of a piston engine, with the waste heat being easily captured from the exhaust) - hence their use as powerplants. Above all, they have a much higher power to weight ratio, and are capaple of handling various and low quality fuels etc. - it'd be easier to produce a hydrogen powered turbine than a piston engine (which would have to be made bigger and heavier to cope with hydrogen).
|
||
2nd Oct 2015 8:12am |
|
miggit Member Since: 12 Jul 2014 Location: Milton Keynes Posts: 3657 |
Ok, so we are talking of a turbine the size of a shoe box then, rather than something the size of the engine that's in the car.
|
||
2nd Oct 2015 10:28am |
|
Lost for Words Member Since: 18 Jun 2015 Location: Warminster, Wiltshire Posts: 473 |
The difference with an IVT over a CVT is that the gearing runs from zero, so no clutch/fluid coupling required. I think I've confused you slightly. The hydraulic motor is part of the IVT itself. The engine (of whichever variety) turns a radial cylinder block of the pump. The pistons are attatched via bearings to a round plate-type bracket which is moved perpendicular to the axis of rotation, varying the displacement and thus the amount of fluid pumped. When in the central position, no fluid is pumped making the gear zero. The on the output side, the fluid is pumped through the hydraulic motor of similar, but fixed displacement, design - the more fluid pumped, the faster the output shaft must turn. By shifting the pistons across the axis, reverse gearing can even be achieved. A hydraulic transmission has the weight advantage over electric to deliver the same power and is able to provide a true constant torque drive, which electric can't. Naturally, producing hydrogen is an issue, but then no alternative fuel is without it's issues and with a gas turbine, it could basically be made to run on whatever fuel is shoved in it. Visiting from DISCO3.CO.UK Discovery 3 TDV6 Auto HSE Zambezi Silver |
||
2nd Oct 2015 11:27am |
|
miggit Member Since: 12 Jul 2014 Location: Milton Keynes Posts: 3657 |
5 star Vodka
|
||
2nd Oct 2015 11:52am |
|
Lost for Words Member Since: 18 Jun 2015 Location: Warminster, Wiltshire Posts: 473 |
Not quite, that's pehaps a more common version - the swashplate. I'm thinking of a radial design, for ease of adjustment and greater strength. The intention was that this only replaces the transmission - and a conventional drivetrain remains to provide better off, and indeed on, road ability. Doesn't save weight, but it's more suitable for a LR, where weight is high anyway, and a fair amount is needed for stable towing. Hydraulic kettle...maybe not, but the design would not be without a conventional alternator. Visiting from DISCO3.CO.UK Discovery 3 TDV6 Auto HSE Zambezi Silver |
||
2nd Oct 2015 12:07pm |
|
miggit Member Since: 12 Jul 2014 Location: Milton Keynes Posts: 3657 |
Yesterday I couldn't spell Engineer... Today I are one!
|
||
2nd Oct 2015 12:32pm |
|
Lost for Words Member Since: 18 Jun 2015 Location: Warminster, Wiltshire Posts: 473 |
Neat. That's using the same principles of another version I've been thinking of - a diff, with one output shaft controlled by a serviceable braking system. Can't quite get my head around how his manages to not require equal work to be applied to the controll shafts though! Visiting from DISCO3.CO.UK
|
||
2nd Oct 2015 1:23pm |
|
miggit Member Since: 12 Jul 2014 Location: Milton Keynes Posts: 3657 |
He is only applying power to the bottom shaft, all the torque is transferred through the gearbox via both shafts, but each one is capable of handling all the power on its' own. so if the bottom shaft isn't turning everything is going through the top, the more the bottom shaft is turned by the smaller motor the slower the top shaft goes and the slower the output. When the lower shaft exceeds the speed of the top shaft the output goes in to reverse. It is a brilliant bit of kit, I hope that he gets it in to production, as it is effectively an automatic transmission, without any friction material, so it should stay one hell of a lot cooler and will give you all the power of the engine,and no torque converter
|
||
2nd Oct 2015 11:01pm |
|
Lost for Words Member Since: 18 Jun 2015 Location: Warminster, Wiltshire Posts: 473 |
Exactly. ISTR, Disco Mikey found something like 80hp was lost through through his D3's drivetrain (with his old, poorly box mind) when it went on the dyno... Visiting from DISCO3.CO.UK Discovery 3 TDV6 Auto HSE Zambezi Silver |
||
3rd Oct 2015 8:15am |
|
miggit Member Since: 12 Jul 2014 Location: Milton Keynes Posts: 3657 |
that's half the total power that I've got Yesterday I couldn't spell Engineer... Today I are one!
|
||
3rd Oct 2015 10:03am |
|
Lost for Words Member Since: 18 Jun 2015 Location: Warminster, Wiltshire Posts: 473 |
I would think and hope that with the transmission in a better state that would be a good deal better at least, but the losses are certainly not insignificant. Visiting from DISCO3.CO.UK
|
||
3rd Oct 2015 10:17am |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis