Advertise on fullfatrr.com »

Home > Off Topic > With all the fuss about diesel, return to petrol engines?
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 2 of 5 <12345>
Print this entire topic · 
miggit



Member Since: 12 Jul 2014
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 3657

United Kingdom 

I am no petrochemist, but I vaguely remember that when distilling crude oil, diesel is produced at a much lower temperature than petrol, so it would make sense that it is cheaper to produce.

But the real reason that diesel is so good for economy is the way that it is ignited, as it relies on the heat generated by compression, and it uses a much higher compression ratio than a petrol engine. This is what makes it way more efficient. 12:1 is about the highest ratio that you will find on a petrol engine, diesel engines start at 18:1 and go as high as 30:1, maybe higher now a days. The higher the compression ratio the more of the fuel is converted into power and not heat.
Or to put it another way about 80% of the petrol burnt in an engine goes up the exhaust as heat Shocked that's one hell of a lot of hot air Rolling with laughter And matters get worse when you start to super / turbo charge a petrol engine, to stop it blowing it's self to bits you have to lower the compression ratio, this in turn compounds the poor fuel to power ratio even further.

I hate myself for saying this, but the best thing for bottom end grunt is electric Shocked Excuse me while I just go and wash my mouth out Laughing Yesterday I couldn't spell Engineer... Today I are one!
Inventor of the 'Guide-o-Matic automatic wheel alignment tool'
Former long term L322 owner, Up/Down graded to a Classic Tractor!

Post #349334 24th Sep 2015 9:59pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
fisha



Member Since: 25 Sep 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1350

2015 Range Rover Autobiography SDV8 Aruba

Electric is fine, but it's how you get the electricity is the issue. Batteries are a waste of time at the moment imho. Lithium ion manufacturing is so polluting that all it does is put the environment factor somewhere else, it's onlyndeflecting the problem.

Future is hydrogen fuel cell, without a doubt in my mind at the moment

As for petrol, Im closely considering coming back to a full fat again and th choice of a 4.2 or tdv8 is a choice I'm finding hard to resolve at the moment and the diesel emissions is not helping the choice now. V8 or else ...

Post #349355 25th Sep 2015 9:33am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
miggit



Member Since: 12 Jul 2014
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 3657

United Kingdom 

It all depends on what you want it for, if you want something to Lord it over everyone else and your not doing any kind of mileage then petrol is a very good choice. If you are covering silly miles and towing, heavy things Mr. Green ( what idiot would do that in a ffrr Shocked ) then a diesel is the only real consideration, or, an LPG power SC and lots of big LPG tanks Laughing

Last year I covered 24,000 miles and over half was towing trailers of around 3 ton weight and the aerodynamics of a brick Laughing I dread to think what that would have cost in petrol Shocked Yesterday I couldn't spell Engineer... Today I are one!
Inventor of the 'Guide-o-Matic automatic wheel alignment tool'
Former long term L322 owner, Up/Down graded to a Classic Tractor!

Post #349419 25th Sep 2015 8:24pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
RR2008HSE



Member Since: 06 Jan 2013
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 2932

Canada 2008 Range Rover HSE 4.4 V8 Java Black

I love my petrol, but 24000 miles and the heavy trailer is what diesels were made for! Not that we got a choice around here... Whistle

Post #349555 26th Sep 2015 11:53pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
ebajema



Member Since: 24 Mar 2011
Location: New Plymouth
Posts: 4782

New Zealand 2010 Range Rover Autobiography 5.0 SC V8 Galway Green

I had a diesel car before (old Peug) and nearly bought a TDV8 iso of my current 5.0 SC. And I bought the SC because of turbo issues with the TDV8, nothing else.

As for electric, I am convinced that is the best way to go, much more practical than hydrogen fuel cell vehicles. The battery issue is virtually solved, combined with chargers that you can put anywhere in the world because there already is a complete electricity network.

Hydrogen does not make sense at all IMHO. Why put a lot of electrical energy into creating it to then make electricity again ??? It is harder and more difficult to store and transport than electricity AND the engine drive train is a very complicated bit of kit compared to an electric drivetrain. Why build and maintain a hydrogen based network like petrol stations now when there is already a complete electricity network there ??? Don't say the network can't handle it because that is simply not true Wink.

With local renewable energy generation, (solar panels on your house/business/apartment block, parking lot etc. and / or a small windmill (park)) the energy generation landscape will change dramatically over the next decades. There may be a short role for hydrogen here as in using hydrogen to store the excess solar / wind energy generated during the day to use it at night but eventually battery technology will surpass that if it hasn't already done so. But that will happen overnight, it is decades that we need still.

Oil and gas are on their way out of energy generation, in their end game although that end game is still a few decades long (so I can still retire in the O&G industry where I have been working for the past 27 years) but it is an end game for sure. The combination of climate change and economic fluctuations due to O&G (and coal) is lethal to it, it is just not sustainable at all.

The future of nuclear is dire as well unless the switch to liquid salt / thorium is made but for whatever reason that does not seem to take place, so I'm convinced that industry will only play a part in the current transfer to fully renewable energy.

The unfortunate thing is that there is a lot of misinformation out there about renewable energy, climate change etc. generated by lobbyists of the O&G and coal industry and lot of others relaying on them. That muddles things up a bit but not forever, more and more the myths are being debunked.

Full electric and full renewable energy is the only way to go and it will work at some point, no doubt because there simply is no alternative until we are able to colonize "space" properly and I'm convinced that is still many more decades away Smile. MY 2010 5.0 SC Galway green and sand interior!!
Have the Faultmate MSV2 Extreme to be tinkering with the settings etc. !!

Post #349565 27th Sep 2015 5:39am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
miggit



Member Since: 12 Jul 2014
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 3657

United Kingdom 

I personally think that the electric + internal combustion generator, not a hybrid, look the best way to go at present, they are returning 200 mpg without any of the draw backs associated with total electric power. If you were to couple that with regenerative braking, and possibly solar top up, I think that you would have a winning combination. Provided that they can solve the spontaneous combustion battery problem Shocked , God knows a ffrr is flammable enough without any extra help Laughing

Electric power is more promising for AWD applications, in fact it's the preferred method of propulsion from the really big dumper trucks, used in open mining (200 ton +). I believe that it gives you more controllable bottom end power, which would equate in to less slip more grunt, prefect for offroad and heavy towing Thumbs Up Yesterday I couldn't spell Engineer... Today I are one!
Inventor of the 'Guide-o-Matic automatic wheel alignment tool'
Former long term L322 owner, Up/Down graded to a Classic Tractor!

Post #349582 27th Sep 2015 8:17am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
stan
Site Moderator


Member Since: 13 Jul 2010
Location: a moderate moderated moderator moderating moderately in moderation
Posts: 35264

United Kingdom 

i was behind a bus yesterday in chelmesford and when it stopped its engine switched off, when the traffic started moving you could hear an electric engine kick in and start moving the bus to about 10mph and then the petrol engine started..saves the large amount of 'start from stop' engine fumes i suppose.. ... - .- -.




Y. O. L. O.
.

Post #349583 27th Sep 2015 8:20am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
ebajema



Member Since: 24 Mar 2011
Location: New Plymouth
Posts: 4782

New Zealand 2010 Range Rover Autobiography 5.0 SC V8 Galway Green

miggit wrote:
I personally think that the electric + internal combustion generator, not a hybrid, look the best way to go at present, they are returning 200 mpg without any of the draw backs associated with total electric power. If you were to couple that with regenerative braking, and possibly solar top up, I think that you would have a winning combination. Provided that they can solve the spontaneous combustion battery problem Shocked , God knows a ffrr is flammable enough without any extra help Laughing

Electric power is more promising for AWD applications, in fact it's the preferred method of propulsion from the really big dumper trucks, used in open mining (200 ton +). I believe that it gives you more controllable bottom end power, which would equate in to less slip more grunt, prefect for offroad and heavy towing Thumbs Up


For the short term I agree with you that some form of very efficient and low emission use of fossil fuel, especially natural gas would be the best way to go. That is why I liked the C-X75 Jag concept with the turbine as a "range extender" / charger.

Then again, if you have the Tesla S with the growing supercharger network, you can already do a lot of driving now. And if you translate it to trucks and busses that do a lot more miles, in those you can also stick a lot more batteries.

I wonder if you make it mandatory, like the Norwegians, to switch public transport (in their case taxis) to full EV, whether it is actually possible to do so. Granted it is only Oslo for now (well 2016 no more registration of fossil fuel taxis if I remember correctly) so not a hell of a lot of cars and they are already bringing in the taxi charging network.

I think a lot of people don't know what is possible and the "vested interests" are (not surprisingly) kicking up their heels and I don't blame them. It will be hard for all those vested interests to change quickly. Although it would be better for the earth to cut fossil fuel burning much faster (and turn vegetarian / vegan) it is hard. However, the cost of not changing fast enough, could be much much higher. If you just look at the cost to society of health issues and associated cost of fossil fuel related emissions and you start taking those into account (which I grant is very hard to do) then you may find out that it makes even more sense to speed things up but because we don't have reliable data (that I'm aware of) it is hard to justify.

And although even the IOCs are slowly acknowledging that renewables will become "more important" (Ben van Beurden Shell) they are still very slow. I wonder if we would start the same process with the IOCs as was done with the cigarette companies (and car companies) how much faster the change would go. But again, I fear that politics and big corporations are very tightly linked together, just look at the number of ex-politicians that become some kind of big corporation hanger oner after leaving politics.............. MY 2010 5.0 SC Galway green and sand interior!!
Have the Faultmate MSV2 Extreme to be tinkering with the settings etc. !!

Post #349615 27th Sep 2015 11:17am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
ebajema



Member Since: 24 Mar 2011
Location: New Plymouth
Posts: 4782

New Zealand 2010 Range Rover Autobiography 5.0 SC V8 Galway Green

miggit wrote:
I personally think that the electric + internal combustion generator, not a hybrid, look the best way to go at present, they are returning 200 mpg without any of the draw backs associated with total electric power. If you were to couple that with regenerative braking, and possibly solar top up, I think that you would have a winning combination. Provided that they can solve the spontaneous combustion battery problem Shocked , God knows a ffrr is flammable enough without any extra help Laughing

Electric power is more promising for AWD applications, in fact it's the preferred method of propulsion from the really big dumper trucks, used in open mining (200 ton +). I believe that it gives you more controllable bottom end power, which would equate in to less slip more grunt, prefect for offroad and heavy towing Thumbs Up


For the short term I agree with you that some form of very efficient and low emission use of fossil fuel, especially natural gas would be the best way to go. That is why I liked the C-X75 Jag concept with the turbine as a "range extender" / charger.

Then again, if you have the Tesla S with the growing supercharger network, you can already do a lot of driving now. And if you translate it to trucks and busses that do a lot more miles, in those you can also stick a lot more batteries.

I wonder if you make it mandatory, like the Norwegians, to switch public transport (in their case taxis) to full EV, whether it is actually possible to do so. Granted it is only Oslo for now (well 2016 no more registration of fossil fuel taxis if I remember correctly) so not a hell of a lot of cars and they are already bringing in the taxi charging network.

I think a lot of people don't know what is possible and the "vested interests" are (not surprisingly) kicking up their heels and I don't blame them. It will be hard for all those vested interests to change quickly. Although it would be better for the earth to cut fossil fuel burning much faster (and turn vegetarian / vegan) it is hard. However, the cost of not changing fast enough, could be much much higher. If you just look at the cost to society of health issues and associated cost of fossil fuel related emissions and you start taking those into account (which I grant is very hard to do) then you may find out that it makes even more sense to speed things up but because we don't have reliable data (that I'm aware of) it is hard to justify.

And although even the IOCs are slowly acknowledging that renewables will become "more important" (Ben van Beurden Shell) they are still very slow. I wonder if we would start the same process with the IOCs as was done with the cigarette companies (and car companies) how much faster the change would go. But again, I fear that politics and big corporations are very tightly linked together, just look at the number of ex-politicians that become some kind of big corporation hanger oner after leaving politics.............. MY 2010 5.0 SC Galway green and sand interior!!
Have the Faultmate MSV2 Extreme to be tinkering with the settings etc. !!

Post #349616 27th Sep 2015 11:18am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
miggit



Member Since: 12 Jul 2014
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 3657

United Kingdom 

I would have thought that an electric + diesel generator would be the "cleanest way", only because it's easy to get diesel engines to run vegetable oil (that's what they were invented for), and this would give you a sustainable refueling option. Plus as you are not reliant on charging points, it would act as a normal vehicle and just drive Shocked no waiting for the batteries to charge, no Embarassed I forgot to plug it in.

Add the fancy harvesting the brake energy thingy and a bit of solar, and I think you've the best of all worlds Thumbs Up Yesterday I couldn't spell Engineer... Today I are one!
Inventor of the 'Guide-o-Matic automatic wheel alignment tool'
Former long term L322 owner, Up/Down graded to a Classic Tractor!

Post #349622 27th Sep 2015 12:09pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Zirconblue



Member Since: 16 Apr 2015
Location: Kent
Posts: 1277

United Kingdom 2005 Range Rover Vogue 4.4 V8 Cairns Blue

There's only a limited supply of used Veg oil, so you end up with Rape being planted everywhere to use for making new stuff which then reduces the amount of land for growing food. - Low net CO2 but over all not very green. (in fact it's yellow. Laughing )

Post #349628 27th Sep 2015 1:11pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
miggit



Member Since: 12 Jul 2014
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 3657

United Kingdom 

Nuts, peanuts Shocked Rolling with laughter Rolling with laughter Yesterday I couldn't spell Engineer... Today I are one!
Inventor of the 'Guide-o-Matic automatic wheel alignment tool'
Former long term L322 owner, Up/Down graded to a Classic Tractor!

Post #349638 27th Sep 2015 3:30pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Mikey



Member Since: 10 Jan 2008
Location: Dundee
Posts: 1750

Scotland 

miggit wrote:
Electric power is more promising for AWD applications, in fact it's the preferred method of propulsion from the really big dumper trucks, used in open mining (200 ton +). I believe that it gives you more controllable bottom end power, which would equate in to less slip more grunt, prefect for offroad and heavy towing Thumbs Up


I do wonder why we never heard more from LR about the ERAD (Electric Rear Axle Drive) system

http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/concept-...rover-erad

Low Emission engine at the front driving 2 wheels, and an electric motor at the back driving the rear wheels, giving electric propulsion, and 4WD when needed Confused

Post #349640 27th Sep 2015 3:40pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
miggit



Member Since: 12 Jul 2014
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 3657

United Kingdom 

That's only a part time system, we have progressed beyond that WW2 tech Wink A few years back Jeep produced a prototype that had 4 electric motors one in each hub, and 4 wheel steer, if memory serves my correct it could turn with in its own length ie \-/ on each axle, plus the usual crab and 4 wheel steer, looked rather odd, but dam handy off road or at the supermarket Laughing Yesterday I couldn't spell Engineer... Today I are one!
Inventor of the 'Guide-o-Matic automatic wheel alignment tool'
Former long term L322 owner, Up/Down graded to a Classic Tractor!

Post #349652 27th Sep 2015 4:01pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
miggit



Member Since: 12 Jul 2014
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 3657

United Kingdom 

Click image to enlarge
 Yesterday I couldn't spell Engineer... Today I are one!
Inventor of the 'Guide-o-Matic automatic wheel alignment tool'
Former long term L322 owner, Up/Down graded to a Classic Tractor!

Post #349654 27th Sep 2015 4:04pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 2 of 5 <12345>
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
fullfatrr.com RSS Feed - All Forums


Switch to Mobile site