Advertise on fullfatrr.com »

Home > General > New to RR. To buy or not to buy?
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 3 123>
Print this entire topic · 
newbierr



Member Since: 31 Dec 2014
Location: n ireland
Posts: 3

United Kingdom 2007 Range Rover Vogue SE TDV8 Barolo Black
New to RR. To buy or not to buy?

Hi. I am looking to purchase my first RR. A 2007 vogue 3.6 td v8 with 60000 miles, 2 owners and very clean is available.

Is this a good buy and am I looking at a reliable and break down free few years with this car? My annual mileage is circa 5000.

Regards

Rob

Post #302158 1st Jan 2015 7:45am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
PaulTyrer



Member Since: 22 Jul 2013
Location: Devizes, Wiltshire
Posts: 1247

United Kingdom 2006 Range Rover Supercharged 4.2 SC V8 Cairns Blue

Nobody buying a Range Rover buys one for reliability and breakdown free years! Even new ones!

Post #302169 1st Jan 2015 10:07am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Cam-Tech-Craig



Member Since: 03 Aug 2011
Location: Gloucestershire
Posts: 16284

England 2015 Range Rover SVAutobiography SDV8 Loire Blue

How long is the piece of string you have Rob? Whistle Whistle Whistle

As far as reliability is concerned, take a look through this site and pick up as many tips as you can for
A, viewing the car and spotting potential issues
B, if she passes muster, what preventative maintenance is required to keep her reliable Thumbs Up

My experience would suggest cars from rural areas your side of the pond can take quite a hammering due to lack of motorways... Constant potholed A & B road use, weather (rust) etc etc so, take your time and check thoroughly my friend... Thumbs Up

Post #302170 1st Jan 2015 10:12am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
KurtVerbose



Member Since: 08 Aug 2010
Location: Les Arses
Posts: 5848

Switzerland 2007 Range Rover Vogue TDV8 Stornoway Grey

For that mileage why not get a petrol, they seem more reliable?

Post #302181 1st Jan 2015 11:36am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
dingg1



Member Since: 29 Jun 2013
Location: PORTUGAL
Posts: 1340

2007 Range Rover Vogue SE 4.2 SC V8 Stornoway Grey

^^

what he said

HNY

Post #302182 1st Jan 2015 11:57am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
northernmonkeyjones



Member Since: 24 Mar 2012
Location: derby
Posts: 8504

United Kingdom 2016 Range Rover Autobiography SDV8 Santorini Black

The short answer is no probably not. There are good ones out there, but even they will have maintenance requirements which go above and beyond normal cars.

Things which require attention at that mileage may include

Alternator
Battery
Suspension components
Track rods
Possible egr problems
Rusty tailgates
Rust on rear wheel arches
Gearbox oil and filter time
Diff oils

Have a look at the buying guide in the wiki there are plenty of hints and things to look out for There is nothing that can't be fixed with a hammer😜😜
FFRR 4.4 SDV8 Autobiography Santorini Black.
Fiat 500x 1.4 multiair Lounge 2015
2010 LR D4 Commercial 2.7 TDV6

Post #302183 1st Jan 2015 11:58am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
B9er



Member Since: 10 Dec 2012
Location: Larne
Posts: 191

Northern Ireland 2010 Range Rover Autobiography 5.0 SC V8 Java Black

As above, buy wisely and keep it properly maintained. In a total of 7 years of RR ownership I have never failed to get to my destination driving one. Running costs (apart from fuel) have been reasonable especially considering how sophisticated these vehicles are. I would also echo the above concerns over buying a diesel for the mileage you do. It's similar annual mileage to mine and in the real world my 5.0SC is genuinely not much harder on fuel than my TD6 was (mostly short journeys).

Be warned though, the rewards of owning/driving are addictive.

If you want a second pair of eyes to check a prospective purchase over, I'm happy to offer my experience (such as it is).

Finally for complete peace of mind get one with a comprehensive warranty, this will push the capital & maintenance budgets though. Lots of stuff on here about warranties and are good research material. Should've been old enough to know better...doh!
Current 2010 5.0 SC Autobiography
Previous 2006 TD6 Vogue SE
Previous 1998 P38 4.6 Vogue Autobiography 50 (No 10)

Post #302195 1st Jan 2015 1:33pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
3528cc



Member Since: 29 Oct 2014
Location: North East
Posts: 301

United Kingdom 2008 Range Rover Autobiography 4.2 SC V8 Buckingham Blue

Have a look through the wiki guide, I found them useful, I am an experience engineer and played with cars for years. Both threads below are well worth a full read

www.fullfatrr.com/forum/post189410.html#189410



www.fullfatrr.com/forum/topic28373.html

I went for a 4.2 SC over a 3.6 TDV8 due to the potential risk of turbo failure and or engine damage with a significant repair bill, don't want to scare you off but you must make an informed decision Regards
Royston

2008 4.2 Supercharged Autobiography
1994 Classic Vogue SE
1999 Rover BRM
1987 Rover Vitesse Twin Plenum

Post #302196 1st Jan 2015 1:48pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
pld118



Member Since: 25 Mar 2013
Location: Bairns
Posts: 4218

Scotland 2014 Range Rover Vogue SDV6 Santorini Black

Welcome newbie rr,

As mentioned, when on song the L322 RR is a superb, addictive and desirable car.

Realism is needed too.

Whatever you might pay as a purchase price, if you are intent on buying one, even if it has a good warranty and/ or is otherwise from a reputable seller, then knowing what I know now, I:

A. Would research based on learned/ this forum recommendations to find a locally accessible highly recommended and trustworthy RR specialist to fully inspect the car before committing to buy (if you are serious about buying one, keeping one for any period of time and are neither a mechanic or mechanically competent, then £100, £200 or a few hundred GBP or Euro should be money well spent in the context of the potential foibles, complexities of these cars and the likely purchase price to secure a good one).

B. Would buy the best model I could afford having regard to age, mileage, condition and this forum/ professional advice on preventative/ maintenance work yet to be done, commensurate with the age and mileage of the prospective purchase (without foolishly paying over the odds given the likely age and mileage of the car at the point of purchase).

C. Would not rush into spending money on doing my own cosmetic upgrades.

D. Would prefer to defer on cosmetic upgrades until I had 'lived with' and was confident about the integrity of the car and the mechanics/ electrics being sound.

E. Would not - even with a good warranty - if not mechanically minded, contemplate buying one without being sure that there was always £2k to £3,000GBP available to me to pay for making good any unforeseen maintenance or repair works arising.

F. Would never lose sight of the fact that all that glitters is not gold and these cars can, from a superficial visual perspective at least, wear high mileage, abuse and neglect very well.

G. Would still buy one in a heartbeat because if you can realistically stand the running costs, the attention to detail needed to keep on top of the car and also stomach proper maintenance/ costs, there will be few cars that match what the L322 RR has to offer.

F. Would get actively involved in contributing to this forum because the support, advice and good will of members is worth it's weight in gold if you own one of these cars.

Buy right and you will enjoy one of the best cars and also a brilliant forum that never sleeps! Thumbs Up

Post #302205 1st Jan 2015 2:48pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
jumbaleo



Member Since: 19 Oct 2014
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 41

United Kingdom 2010 Range Rover Autobiography 5.0 SC V8 Santorini Black

Hi Rob

i would echo what "pld118" has said above. Its not realistic to be able to expect to run one of these on a budget, its really not possible if you want something that won't let you down.

However, they are exceptional vehicles when well looked after and simply fantastic to drive.

I purchased and own a 3.6 tdv8 which was a one owner vehicle, expecting to have the diesel be a good economical option to a petrol V8. I was wrong, in retrospect, I feel the diesel is a bit of a false economy, you may get 4 or 5 miles to the gallon more, but the general servicing and maintenance costs are a lot higher for diesel.

With your low millage it may be more sensible to consider a 4.2 or 5.0 petrol super charge version.

Good luck

Post #302213 1st Jan 2015 3:49pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
birchyman71



Member Since: 18 Feb 2013
Location: stockton on tees
Posts: 147

United Kingdom 2008 Range Rover Vogue TDV8 Java Black

I'm considering the trade up.from my 03 td6 to either a 3.6 tdv8 or a 4.2 sc ,the main thing putting me off the supercharged is the interior as for my budget they all seem to have the same interior style as.the td6, yet all the tdv8 s come with terrain response etc. Like lots of people have said I'll take some time and not rush in, what age did they start putting the facelift interiors in the petrols

Post #302261 1st Jan 2015 9:43pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Cam-Tech-Craig



Member Since: 03 Aug 2011
Location: Gloucestershire
Posts: 16284

England 2015 Range Rover SVAutobiography SDV8 Loire Blue

Birchyman, all FF's got terrain response and the interior upgrade for the 2007my> be it the TDV8 or the SC... So, remember sir, 2006> means higher RFL 2007my signified the death of the TD6/birth of the TDV8 which all were 2007my> and had the facelift & terrain response... The 4.2 SC engined cars ran throughout and mirrored the 2007my updates the diesel cars got Thumbs Up

Post #302264 1st Jan 2015 10:18pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
johnboyairey



Member Since: 11 Jan 2013
Location: surrey
Posts: 2032

United Kingdom 2012 Range Rover Westminster TDV8 Orkney Grey


I hold it true, whate'er befall;
I feel it, when I sorrow most;
'Tis better to have loved and lost
Than never to have loved at all.

Post #302272 1st Jan 2015 11:34pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
kingpleb



Member Since: 07 Jun 2011
Location: Maybe here. Maybe there, I get everywhere!
Posts: 8455

United Kingdom 2005 Range Rover Vogue Td6 Bonatti Grey

IMO get a slightly older and cheaper SC pre facelift so the cheaper road tax as the money saved could buy nearly two tanks of fuel Very Happy

There are some about ranging from £9k+ but if you get one under 100k miles you can get a semi decent warranty on it as long as it has FULL service history and backup to prove it and as someone who has driven NI roads quite a bit over the years and the motorways I'd recommend the SC.

The only way a TDV8 in your circumstances would make sense in my books would be if you were running it on cherry and running the gauntlet doing so.

Also the SC has less engine issues than the TDV8 over all but its not perfect! FFRR MY06 facelift With TDV8 Alloys Zeros/ATR's
Mantec Sump Guard, Rigid Load liner, MY10 BT upgrade.

Post #302273 1st Jan 2015 11:39pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
newbierr



Member Since: 31 Dec 2014
Location: n ireland
Posts: 3

United Kingdom 2007 Range Rover Vogue SE TDV8 Barolo Black
thank you

Firstly, thank you to everyone who have taken the time and effort toreply to my request for help with my decision. I was amazed with the quality of the content and your interest to assist.

My decision is partly Hampered by thge fact that my current car, Merc CLK, owned from new and now just over 9yrs age, has been a great success. It has 120000 miles and only broke down the once, a few months back with a blown intercooler.Over the period of ownership, excluding fuel and depreciation, the car has cost just ₤15 per week to run .I get ave 46 mpg out of the diesel 2.1 ltr engine.

Would the M class be a better choice or would that also besimilarunning cost and reliability to the RR? l

Post #302278 2nd Jan 2015 7:18am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 3 123>
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
fullfatrr.com RSS Feed - All Forums


Switch to Mobile site