![]() | Home > General > What to buy ... |
![]() ![]() |
|
|
robjp Member Since: 14 Jan 2013 Location: North Wales Posts: 104 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Well, here I am. Previously been a Range rover owner (4.0 P38, then an early TD6 vogue), and, after a bit of time away, I'm contemplating returning.
|
||
![]() |
|
Gazellio @ Prestige Cars Member Since: 22 Jan 2010 Location: Chilterns, UK Posts: 11309 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
[Stan you made it look like I was recommending the TD6 by deleting my partial quote mate. I was pointing out it was TD6 not TDV6!!!!]
|
||
![]() |
|
robjp Member Since: 14 Jan 2013 Location: North Wales Posts: 104 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
[]
|
||
![]() |
|
JAYBOY Member Since: 17 Oct 2012 Location: South Wales Posts: 2204 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Its up to you.
|
||
![]() |
|
STMVOGUE2010 Member Since: 23 Aug 2012 Location: Alloa Posts: 100 ![]() ![]() |
Meant TD6 |
||
![]() |
|
mjdronfield Member Since: 04 Nov 2011 Location: Derbyshire Posts: 7877 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Td6 chipped to 230 is my suggestion - more reliable engine, but not as modern. Just get a nice cheap one and save money for gearbox 2011 Range Rover Vogue SE 4.4 TDV8
|
||
![]() |
|
KurtVerbose Member Since: 08 Aug 2010 Location: Les Arses Posts: 5848 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
There's no right answer.
|
||
![]() |
|
andyleeds Member Since: 31 Dec 2010 Location: west yorks Posts: 963 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
my TD6 is super reliable, maybe be because i have had it since 38k miles on the clock and have looked at it ..... to me having a reliable car is the most important so i would go far a late / low mileage TD6 like i did |
||
![]() |
|
Alistair Member Since: 11 Feb 2011 Location: Peterborough / Bordeaux / Andorra Posts: 7975 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
If you drive them, the answer may become obvious - I hated the TD6, but the TDV8 is a different beast |
||
![]() |
|
robjp Member Since: 14 Jan 2013 Location: North Wales Posts: 104 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
That's what I've been thinking, a low (ish) mileage one, and look after it.
When I previously had a TD6, I never thought it was lacking in power in any way. It's far more about being a luxury limo that can do an astonishing range of off-road tasks, can tow an amazing weight, go through 2 feet of floodwater, up the hills to home in freezing snowy conditions, and yet still be cossetting on a 400 mile trip up to the Highlands, 4 up and loaded.
I have to say I'm not a huge fan of the recent LR/RR 'bling' look, to me it's a bit too common/desperate and shouting 'LOOK AT ME' all the time. The originals are far more discreet. Do have to agree regarding the gearbox though Hope I didn't offend too many people with that last comment ... if so, my apologies |
||
![]() |
|
KurtVerbose Member Since: 08 Aug 2010 Location: Les Arses Posts: 5848 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I agree on the later bling look - much prefer the original. I don't know what Land Rover were thinking when they Rooney-fied it. I guess I shouldn't have written 'looking prehistoric'. I meant in terms of technology. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ae0e/3ae0ea418f535f5c2f69ecd8f4c2aa1e454dbd53" alt=""