Home > General > What's the point? |
|
|
johnson1 Member Since: 30 Aug 2010 Location: South West Posts: 519 |
For the chavs that couldn't afford THE Range Rover.... |
||
6th May 2012 7:51pm |
|
Vogue Member Since: 31 Jan 2008 Location: on the hill Posts: 3742 |
oh hell , wait for it , incoming , think you just prodded the wasps nest
|
||
6th May 2012 8:40pm |
|
johnson1 Member Since: 30 Aug 2010 Location: South West Posts: 519 |
Pffft what can they say? Who would choose a sport over the FFRR..... |
||
6th May 2012 9:55pm |
|
Stephen.125 Member Since: 25 Jun 2009 Location: Frodsham Posts: 1511 |
FYI don't lump the majority of Cheshire in with a small area populated by footballers just because Clarkson says so. |
||
6th May 2012 10:24pm |
|
0cj0 Member Since: 14 Apr 2011 Location: York Posts: 61 |
The cheapest used RRS is way more expensive than the cheapest used FF ... I'm seeing more "chavs" in the FF than sport simply because they are now more affordable.
|
||
6th May 2012 10:54pm |
|
mzplcg Member Since: 26 May 2010 Location: Warwickshire. England. The Commonwealth. Posts: 4029 |
And, although I wouldn't buy one, the Sport is a better towing vehicle being based on a chassis rather than monocoque. That said, if I was worried about that I'd have a Discovery. |
||
7th May 2012 7:24am |
|
essexfarmer Member Since: 04 Nov 2011 Location: Essex Posts: 51 |
Interesting post, I am lucky enough to have both to use and I don't really consider myself a Chav (even if I do live in Essex) but I like my RRS. With reference to the cost, when I ordered the RRS I was offered a FF Vogue SE with 300 miles on the clock for the same money and just lately I have seen LPR advertise pre registered FF's for less than I paid for the RRS.
|
||
7th May 2012 7:45am |
|
fisha Member Since: 25 Sep 2009 Location: Scotland Posts: 1350 |
A long time ago in a dealer, not long after the RRS came out, the dealer made the comment to me:
|
||
7th May 2012 8:30am |
|
cleughy Member Since: 08 Mar 2012 Location: West Kirby Posts: 361 |
personally the only RRS owners i know don't live in Cheshire, but my FF owning pals do............. |
||
7th May 2012 8:40am |
|
JOKER Member Since: 11 Sep 2008 Location: Sconnie Botland Posts: 15876 |
The first edition Sport i was not a fan of but the newer updated one i have to say i really like , the only thing that stops me from getting one is the other half as she thinks they are for the younger drivers
..
|
||
7th May 2012 10:02am |
|
Bellini Member Since: 11 Jan 2012 Location: Berkshire Posts: 2261 |
Although I prefer the FF over the Sport, I'd buy a Sport over any of its rivals in a heartbeat. Si. <This is my name.
|
||
7th May 2012 10:06am |
|
Cam-Tech-Craig Member Since: 03 Aug 2011 Location: Gloucestershire Posts: 16284 |
+1 Craig |
||
7th May 2012 10:17am |
|
northernmonkeyjones Member Since: 24 Mar 2012 Location: derby Posts: 8510 |
In outright terms the rrs may well be a slightly better tow car but the ff is hardly shabby. Just towed 2 1/2 hours back from norfolk in the death star and it was as smooth as silk. Personally i think the v8 suits pulling stuff better than a v6 rgardless of the monocoque on chassis status of the rrs and disco.
|
||
7th May 2012 3:38pm |
|
Philip Member Since: 05 Jan 2010 Location: UK Posts: 2564 |
Towed plenty of things with both L322s and Discoveries (Sport minus the drag).
|
||
7th May 2012 3:43pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis