Home > General (L405) > Details of L405 in Autocar |
|
|
Gazellio @ Prestige Cars Member Since: 22 Jan 2010 Location: Chilterns, UK Posts: 11309 |
In the flesh it will look a lot more "normal" and will have various Tyre/Wheel choices as always.
|
||
30th Mar 2012 8:01am |
|
JOKER Member Since: 11 Sep 2008 Location: Sconnie Botland Posts: 15876 |
Well you can let us all know Gaz , As you may be one of the first owners since your minted ... ====================================
|
||
30th Mar 2012 8:08am |
|
Gazellio @ Prestige Cars Member Since: 22 Jan 2010 Location: Chilterns, UK Posts: 11309 |
So says Mr McThree-Grilles |
||
30th Mar 2012 8:15am |
|
JOKER Member Since: 11 Sep 2008 Location: Sconnie Botland Posts: 15876 |
====================================
|
||
30th Mar 2012 8:24am |
|
Gazellio @ Prestige Cars Member Since: 22 Jan 2010 Location: Chilterns, UK Posts: 11309 |
|
||
30th Mar 2012 8:24am |
|
Philip Member Since: 05 Jan 2010 Location: UK Posts: 2564 |
|
||
3rd Apr 2012 10:36am |
|
Mounty Member Since: 29 Jan 2009 Location: Allschwil Posts: 311 |
I like it. I agree that the front looks a bit messy. But I think the lower half be tidied up. Daniel
|
||
4th Apr 2012 9:02am |
|
paul r Member Since: 27 Feb 2012 Location: Nantwich Posts: 213 |
125k for the top model? Bejesus! |
||
4th Apr 2012 9:22am |
|
JOKER Member Since: 11 Sep 2008 Location: Sconnie Botland Posts: 15876 |
Thats just some Teaboys drawing in Autocar that they have fired up …. doubt very much it will look like that …. POS ====================================
|
||
4th Apr 2012 9:32am |
|
Philip Member Since: 05 Jan 2010 Location: UK Posts: 2564 |
The shadows on the sills and arches look a bit exaggerated in the Autocar impression (which appears to be based on the following photo but reversed), but but there's not a huge amount of room for manoeuvre when there are virtually undisguised cars running around:
I'll wager that the Autocar impression is pretty accurate given that there's little left concealed on the prototypes. Last edited by Philip on 4th Apr 2012 10:39am. Edited 2 times in total |
||||
4th Apr 2012 9:44am |
|
DeRanged Rover Member Since: 16 Feb 2012 Location: London Posts: 379 |
Front end looks a little too "touareg" for me African Bush Junkie ... in London!
|
||
4th Apr 2012 10:05am |
|
JOKER Member Since: 11 Sep 2008 Location: Sconnie Botland Posts: 15876 |
Suppose you could be right Trommel , Just never bothered taking those Mules too seriously …. ====================================
|
||
4th Apr 2012 10:15am |
|
Java Jungle Member Since: 22 Mar 2010 Location: Monte-Carlo Posts: 420 |
As you say Trommel those weird vent/ripple things on the lower front part are looks a bit "Cayennish" to me....just the thing to avoid!!
|
||
4th Apr 2012 10:40am |
|
Bellini Member Since: 11 Jan 2012 Location: Berkshire Posts: 2261 |
To me, a primary attraction of the RR is its 'restrained elegance' looks.
|
||
4th Apr 2012 11:33am |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis