Advertise on fullfatrr.com »

Home > Maintenance & Mods (L322) > Actual tire sizes changed DSC behavior?
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 1
Print this entire topic · 
SpitfireS



Member Since: 10 Jun 2019
Location: Mainz
Posts: 101

Germany 2012 Range Rover Vogue SE 4.4 V8 Santorini Black
Actual tire sizes changed DSC behavior?

Hello All,
Recently I changed some of the CCF values regarding the actual tire width and aspect ratio.
Some, as most had the correct wheel/tire combination already entered.
What I changed was the tire width and aspect ratio into 255 and 50 respectively, the original stored value was undefined.

There is a tight 180 degree turn on my daily commute, one has to accelerate a bit to merge with traffic, starting to accelerate during the turn as the merging lane is kinda short.
I know the RR is not a race car Smile
Before the value change I always wondered why the DSC would sometimes intervene in that turn, the car was never close to sliding or losing grip in any way.
The day after entering the actual values it seems the DSC was not alarmed anymore (I pushed to the level it would intervene before) by me taking that turn at 'speed'.

Anybody else noticed a change in DSC behavior when changing those CCF values?
Question 2012 4.4TDV8
2000 Honda S2000

Post #699200 31st Aug 2024 5:42pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
JayGee



Member Since: 27 Jul 2021
Location: London
Posts: 3172

United Kingdom 2012 Range Rover Vogue 4.4 V8 Orkney Grey

Makes sense but why were those values not there in the first place and what else in the CCF is ‘ undefined’? 2012 TDV8 Vogue (L322)

Post #699223 1st Sep 2024 7:40am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
SpitfireS



Member Since: 10 Jun 2019
Location: Mainz
Posts: 101

Germany 2012 Range Rover Vogue SE 4.4 V8 Santorini Black

After buying an IID recently I, of course, had a look at the CCF.
First thing I actually changed, again: of course Wink, was the activation of the digital speedo.
Latest change was the eco fuel percentage, or something like that, now at '0' it looks to be close(r) to real world consumption.

Going through the data I noticed many 'undefined' values.

Are you saying that's uncommon? 2012 4.4TDV8
2000 Honda S2000

Post #699544 5th Sep 2024 11:23am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
fullfatrr.com RSS Feed - All Forums


Switch to Mobile site