Advertise on fullfatrr.com »

Home > Technical (L405) > Ride quality -16 SDV8 AB
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 22 of 35 <123 ... 212223 ... 333435>
Print this entire topic · 
mjdronfield



Member Since: 04 Nov 2011
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 7840

United Kingdom 2011 Range Rover Vogue SE TDV8 Buckingham Blue

Might be different on the L405, but I’m sure on the L322 someone said that the adaptive dynamics system doesn’t come live until the car is in D and moving. Might not be an issue if you just want raw readings though. Only a thought.

Thumbs Up 2011 Range Rover Vogue SE 4.4 TDV8

Previous cars :
2003 Range Rover Vogue TD6
1999 Discovery Td5 ES
1995 BMW M5 3.8 6 speed
1992 Range Rover 3.9 Efi Vogue
1992 BMW M5 3.8
1988 BMW 735i SE
1989 Ford Sierra XR4x4 2.9i
1981 Ford Fiesta Supersport

Post #667242 21st Jun 2023 4:42pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
MarianaWestminster



Member Since: 14 Jun 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 687

United Kingdom 

Yes it's the same on the l405, it's not active until you engage drive and begin to move.

Just not sure if it's normal or odd for one accelerometer out of the 3 to report a lower m/s2 value although they all report the same voltage.

I will have a look at the live data on that and see if they all report the same.


Last edited by MarianaWestminster on 5th Nov 2023 11:16pm. Edited 1 time in total

Post #667271 21st Jun 2023 8:44pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
GraemeS



Member Since: 06 Mar 2015
Location: Wagga area
Posts: 2538

Australia 2012 Range Rover Autobiography TDV8 Bournville

The only output from the accelerometers is the voltage which is then translated to acceleration so I don't understand why the different acceleration from identical voltages. The calculated acceleration discrepancy might be an error in the tool's calc from voltage but if extracted pre-calculated then while not moving the results should all be the same when voltages are identical.
I'll check my L322's later today. I've previously displayed the voltages but not the calculated acceleration.

It is possible that accelerometers need to be calibrated once fitted to account for any variations in the produced voltage for a given acceleration.

Edit: This might explain why the LR diagnostic tool requires the vehicle to be stationary for L322 CVD calibration, possibly to calibrate the accelerometers, whereas the IIDTool's function requires a (IIRC) 20 second drive to calibrate how to smooth the ride over bumps, but couldn't possibly calibrate accelerometers while moving.

Post #667273 21st Jun 2023 9:12pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
MarianaWestminster



Member Since: 14 Jun 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 687

United Kingdom 

Thanks Graeme, that would be useful.

I didnt realise the m/s2 are calculated and not actual values but it will be interesting to know if other cars report differences when it seems like they should all be the same.

Interesting points re calibration, it's not available for the l405 in SDD nor is it available on the IID (confirmed with GAP directly)

Post #667275 21st Jun 2023 10:01pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
MarianaWestminster



Member Since: 14 Jun 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 687

United Kingdom 

Just to add, Pat at GAP told me they've had other people complaining about damping/ride quality issues on 2010+ cars but as yet nobody has figured out why.

He said he was going to speak with engineering about it and emailed me again today asking for my VIN number.

He didn't say what he wanted it for but I'll update if it goes anywhere.

Post #667276 21st Jun 2023 10:03pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
GraemeS



Member Since: 06 Mar 2015
Location: Wagga area
Posts: 2538

Australia 2012 Range Rover Autobiography TDV8 Bournville

The voltage display is rounded to 2 decimal places so it wouldn't take much to show slightly different acceleration values. Furthermore I would expect the change in values would be used in the CVD algorithims and looking at my L322's values that reached 3600 m/s while driving on a bumpy track, very small values are likely to be insignificant anyway.

I graphed mine's values but I'm still trying to get hold of the saved file.

Update: My IIDtool can only show acceleration for the L322's front 2 accelerometers and voltage for all 3. My graph shows both front going from 0 to 3250 with some spikes well above the 3250 graph limit, with some returning to zero within 1 second. The spikes can rise more quickly than they fall and vice-versa, indcating that the damping forces can be changed between shock compression and extension.

Post #667278 22nd Jun 2023 12:55am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
MarianaWestminster



Member Since: 14 Jun 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 687

United Kingdom 

So Graeme are you suggesting the differences I see in the sensors at standstill aren't likely to have much of an impact on the system?

The only difference I can see between our cars is that your values start at 0 whereas mine are at 250, 350 and 350 m/s2.

(Comparing L322 to L405 here obviously)

Still trying to work out in my head if there is a connection between all 3 hard riding cars I've owned...

Post #667279 22nd Jun 2023 6:28am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
GraemeS



Member Since: 06 Mar 2015
Location: Wagga area
Posts: 2538

Australia 2012 Range Rover Autobiography TDV8 Bournville

I consider that the difference at stand-still will be totally insignificant given the values that are derived from the sensor voltages as vertical movement occurs, judging by the graphs from my sensors. Your acceleration discrepancy is in all likelihood due to showing voltages to only 2 decimal places.

Mine's 0 start is on the graph where the high value is 3250 but static acceleration varied between 0.250 m/s and 0.650 m/s.

Post #667284 22nd Jun 2023 8:08am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
MarianaWestminster



Member Since: 14 Jun 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 687

United Kingdom 

Ah I understand now, I thought you had meant yours show 0 m/s2 static but my mistake I had understood.

So looks like that's the accelerometers ruled out as a wonky input to the system.

Back to the drawing board again, only thing I have to check right now is height sensors manually for any mechanical binding.

Post #667290 22nd Jun 2023 9:00am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
MarianaWestminster



Member Since: 14 Jun 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 687

United Kingdom 

Manually checked both front height sensors tonight by disconnecting them from the control arm and sweeping through the available range of movement by hand.

No voltage drops or spikes on either, the erraticness of one of the graph may be due to me moving the front right faster than I moved the front left.

The front left sensor didn't move as freely as the front right but wasn't 'binding' it felt more like 'sticksion' if that's understandable?

Front left:




Front right:





I will remove the rear wheels tomorrow morning to access and check rear sensors.

Post #667320 22nd Jun 2023 6:34pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
fisha



Member Since: 25 Sep 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1400

2015 Range Rover Autobiography SDV8 Aruba

Yes, there is normally a little bit of stiction/friction to the sensor arm. I suppose it'll be the seals and what not, as that will also smooth out jitter movement too. V8 or else ...

Post #667322 22nd Jun 2023 7:09pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
MarianaWestminster



Member Since: 14 Jun 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 687

United Kingdom 

I expect there is meant to be some Fisha but the left side more so than the right.

Suppose I can compare the 'sticksion' of the rears to the fronts tomorrow when I check them.

Post #667323 22nd Jun 2023 7:12pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
MarianaWestminster



Member Since: 14 Jun 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 687

United Kingdom 

GAP have supplied me with the latest updates for the CHCM and CHCMB.

I'm going to update both and see if it makes a difference Thumbs Up

Post #667331 22nd Jun 2023 9:40pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Haylands



Member Since: 04 Mar 2014
Location: East Yorkshire
Posts: 8336

England 2014 Range Rover Autobiography SDV8 Loire Blue

Fingers crossed... Thumbs Up Pete
__________________________________________________
2014 L405 Autobiography SDV8 4.4 Loire Blue Ebony interior
2011 L322 Vogue SE 4.4 TDV8 Baltic Blue. Parchment over Navy Interior. Sold
2012 L322 Autobiography 5.0 Supercharged Ipanema Sand, Jet Interior. Sold
2002 L322 Vogue 4.4 V8 Epson Green, Ivory over Aspen Interior (Fatty Offroader) Sold
-Click for Project Fatty off roader-

Post #667348 23rd Jun 2023 8:54am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
MarianaWestminster



Member Since: 14 Jun 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 687

United Kingdom 

Thanks Haylands, being unable to sleep last night I ventured outside in the very early hours and tried to update the modules.

The IID aborted the flash on both and gave me some error codes which I've forwarded to Pat at GAP.

Will update.

Post #667351 23rd Jun 2023 9:06am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 22 of 35 <123 ... 212223 ... 333435>
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
fullfatrr.com RSS Feed - All Forums


Switch to Mobile site