Advertise on fullfatrr.com »

Home > General (L405) > Buying an L405
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 1
Print this entire topic · 
Triarii



Member Since: 10 Feb 2015
Location: Wess Vinglun
Posts: 186

United Kingdom 2017 Range Rover Autobiography SDV8 Corris Grey
Buying an L405

Thinking of getting an L405. I currently have a 2009 L322 3.6 TDV8 - will I notice much difference between the 3.0 and the 4.4 L405? It'll tow a tin tent for 5 or 6 times a year otherwise it's a daily driver.
I'm not interested in the bigger engine just for racing it though as Madam has a car for that. 17 MY Corris Grey 4.4 VAB
Silver MB R231 SL350

Post #443880 8th Jul 2017 7:49am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
northernmonkeyjones



Member Since: 24 Mar 2012
Location: derby
Posts: 8501

United Kingdom 2016 Range Rover Autobiography SDV8 Santorini Black

Between the 2 L405 models, yes.

Between the 3.0 and your 3.6, you should find that the 3.0 feels at least as fast powerful as that if not faster. It's lighter and almost as powerful. The 3.0 is by all accounts fairly equivalent in performance to the 4.4 tdv8 L322.

Compared to your 3.6 the 4.4 will feel significantly quicker.

Personally I would drive both, and not get too hung up on the engine size. There is nothing that can't be fixed with a hammer😜😜
FFRR 4.4 SDV8 Autobiography Santorini Black.
Fiat 500x 1.4 multiair Lounge 2015
2010 LR D4 Commercial 2.7 TDV6

Post #443883 8th Jul 2017 8:06am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
jumpin mouse



Member Since: 28 Feb 2016
Location: North West
Posts: 222

United Kingdom 2015 Range Rover Autobiography SDV8 Aruba

This is always an interesting question to ask on this forum. Us 4.4's love our engines and them 3.0's love theirs. In conclusion I would say that both engines are good, one is a bit smoother and less power but probably enough power for a lot of people.


The 4.4 is better though! Smile

Post #443887 8th Jul 2017 9:18am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
stan
Site Moderator


Member Since: 13 Jul 2010
Location: a moderate moderated moderator moderating moderately in moderation
Posts: 35262

United Kingdom 

i believe there's a difference in tax on these two... ... - .- -.




Y. O. L. O.
.

Post #443888 8th Jul 2017 9:32am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Basilfawlty



Member Since: 18 Oct 2015
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 655

England 2016 Range Rover Autobiography SDV8 Corris Grey

SDV8 l405 pretty quick and loads of torque if a little unrefined compared against some other V8 diesels. V6 plenty quick enough in real life driving situations and gets away from the line extremely well even compared with its big brother but undoubtedly it's not ultimately as quick. Would it pull a tin tent? Well the best towing car out there is a D4 and that has the V6 in it so absolutely.

How do they compare against the old 3.6 and 4.4.? Well the V6 is as quick as the 4.4 and quicker than the 3.6 but once again the l405 V8 is quicker still and makes a good noise when you press the loud pedal. It's just that 405's, especially the way I drive them are best when wafting along, serenely and thats why I prefer the V6, having owned both. That said, it's a bit of a swings and roundabouts situation, so I'd certainly consider both the V8 and V6 in my next car, which ultimately will be bought on condition, mileage and spec. Thumbs Up

Post #443979 8th Jul 2017 10:21pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
AndyS



Member Since: 27 Feb 2016
Location: Lymington, Hampshire
Posts: 402

United Kingdom 

V6 is a better driving car if you can ever call a FFRR that! Much lighter front end, feels more lively and goes very well giving 95% of a V8's performance. My V6 towed my 2.5t rib to Sardinia with no issues at all, only occasionally up a long hill did I feel I needed more power.

If I had the choice of two identical specc'd cars I'd choose the V8 over the V6 but they are very close.

Post #444006 9th Jul 2017 9:31am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Scottyav



Member Since: 11 Feb 2013
Location: Cannock Staffordshire
Posts: 1200

United Kingdom 2007 Range Rover Autobiography TDV8 Zambezi Silver

Thought of the 5-0 sc Evil or Very Mad there as good fuel wise as the older l322 _____________________________________________________
Zambezi silver Vogue Se unique Smile

Post #444061 9th Jul 2017 6:10pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Triarii



Member Since: 10 Feb 2015
Location: Wess Vinglun
Posts: 186

United Kingdom 2017 Range Rover Autobiography SDV8 Corris Grey

Thanks all. Madam is paying so she may get the ultimate call on the engine. When the wife says she'll buy you a new car you don't tend to quibble if she wants a certain spec! 17 MY Corris Grey 4.4 VAB
Silver MB R231 SL350

Post #444076 9th Jul 2017 8:25pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
caymanblack



Member Since: 08 Dec 2015
Location: DEVON
Posts: 1129

United Kingdom 2017 Range Rover Autobiography SDV8 Carpathian Grey

Scottyav wrote:
Thought of the 5-0 sc Evil or Very Mad there as good fuel wise as the older l322

I think its a good call as its not diesel!!!!!!

Post #444108 10th Jul 2017 10:42am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
CSK



Member Since: 15 Oct 2010
Location: St Tropez
Posts: 750

France 2013 Range Rover Autobiography 5.0 SC V8 Causeway Grey

Scottyav wrote:
Thought of the 5-0 sc Evil or Very Mad there as good fuel wise as the older l322


I have owned both L322 5.0 SC and L405 and the L405 is.much better on petrol probably because it is a bit lighter, slightly more aerodynamic but perhaps more due to the 8 speed gearbox instead of the older 6 speed in the L322.
If you're not flooring it all the time, it is very reasonable.

Post #444173 11th Jul 2017 12:36am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Singh911



Member Since: 04 Jun 2017
Location: London
Posts: 51

United Kingdom 2010 Range Rover Autobiography 5.0 SC V8 Santorini Black

i drove a few cars with the 4.4 and the 3.0 before buying mine.
i concluded that the 3 was ideally suited to the car. whenever i turn a corner, it gives me the feeling that it rolled a lot less than i thought it would. the 4.4 has the anti roll technology but i think it needs it because the front end is so much heavier. the 3 doesnt have it and i dont think it needs it. it has a really sweet front end and is very smooth.. the fuel economy has been surprisingly good too.
hth Current
5.0 S/C 2010 Autobiography
458 Spider
996 GT3 mk1
GR Yaris
W124 E320 estate

Previous
VSE MY2016 3.0tdv6 - stolen January 2024
F10 M5
Cayenne S
993
X5

Post #445212 20th Jul 2017 10:04pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
fullfatrr.com RSS Feed - All Forums


Switch to Mobile site