For me its nuclear as the way forward. I'm no expert but clearly the technology is there and it is safe (as Chernobly issue was man made and the Fushima was a mix of him upstairs and the location of the plant).

Personally I am concerned about fracking because I believe it to be driven by profit rather than a proven safe ability to meet a need.

I think J90s comments at the top of this thread are spot on. 405 AB exec seats Baltic and Cirrus
93 RR Classic efi

Remember it's easier to get forgiveness than permission!

Gone in order:
4.4 TDV8 SE - gone to a good home
93 Classic hard dash Plymouth Blue
03 L322 Oslo Blue
2000 Disco TD5 ES Epsom Green
98 P38 Rioja Red
89 Classic Cairngorm Brown

I agree with Nuclear, I think the technology is there (with huge improvements to come) and it is the safest and most efficient power option by far.

Personally if I was in charge, I would invest in Nuclear power as the main and back up power. I would also invest in tidal (for the UK there is a lot of potential power that is 100 % reliable) and offshore wind and wave if productive.

When not in high demand I would have the power converted to liquid Hydrogen ( most cars can be converted to run on it) as well as pumping up reserves of water to hydro lakes that can be used when demand needs it.

This would sort out emissions, keep the green brigade happy and also provide as much clean power as we would ever need. Tom

Current Drive
2011 4.4 TDV8 Autobiography - Santorini Black - Ivory Leather

Previous Drives
2004 Model Vogue Td6 (Touchscreen) - Java Black - Parchment Leather
1994 RR Classic 3.9 V8 Soft dash - Niagara Grey - Grey Leather
1972 Series III SWB Safari - Green (Hand Painted) - Black Plastic