![]() | Home > General > 4.4td v 4.4petrol |
![]() ![]() |
|
|
Cam-Tech-Craig Member Since: 04 Aug 2011 Location: Gloucestershire Posts: 16341 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Funnily enough i think quite the opposite. A high end motorcar should feel un-hurried and comfortable to travel and be driven in! Everytime i jump in a BMW engined 4.4FF (not the jag engined) i have to physically think for the first few minutes when pulling off so as not to break my bloody neck!
|
||
![]() |
|
andrew-a Member Since: 07 Sep 2011 Location: Wirral Posts: 70 ![]() ![]() |
How does the 5.0SC compare? Is this more comparable to the old 4.4 petrol? |
||
![]() |
|
Cam-Tech-Craig Member Since: 04 Aug 2011 Location: Gloucestershire Posts: 16341 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Very few & far between around these parts Andrew... Most of our work is on pre 2011 FF's and 95% of them are derv |
||
![]() |
|
kingpleb Member Since: 07 Jun 2011 Location: Maybe here. Maybe there, I get everywhere! Posts: 8455 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
A remap will quickly cure this!
|
||
![]() |
|
CSK Member Since: 15 Oct 2010 Location: St Tropez Posts: 750 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I know exactly what you mean as I've owned two TDV8's before going petrol. The 5.0L Supercharged is a very sweet engine giving instant power delivery with no lag whatsoever. |
||
![]() |
|
Haylands Member Since: 04 Mar 2014 Location: East Yorkshire Posts: 8560 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It's the same with any diesel turbo fitted to an auto box, you start off from tickover and have to wait for the revs to build a bit before the turbo's come in and give all that torque, even if the stall speed of the torque convertor is raised you still have to wait for turbo lag...
|
||
![]() |
|
Gazellio @ Prestige Cars Member Since: 22 Jan 2010 Location: Chilterns, UK Posts: 11309 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I underestand completely. When I pull out the drive in my 4.4 V8 Petrol I often get a surprise as I put my foot down and the car surges forward and the revs build quickly as it literally shoots forward - and the noise! Makes me smile every time as its somehow not expected by my brain sitting in a Range Rover. |
||
![]() |
|
IanV8 Member Since: 14 Jan 2010 Location: Dunfermline Posts: 502 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I always thought my 4.4 petrol was quick off the mark but find the present 4.4 tdv8 even quicker.
|
||
![]() |
|
Cam-Tech-Craig Member Since: 04 Aug 2011 Location: Gloucestershire Posts: 16341 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The Jag engined cars don't do this though... SC or NA don't... Maybe they mapped it out during the design phase? ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
RR2008HSE Member Since: 06 Jan 2013 Location: British Columbia Posts: 2932 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
^ |
||
![]() |
|
Gazellio @ Prestige Cars Member Since: 22 Jan 2010 Location: Chilterns, UK Posts: 11309 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yes for me its a good argument for the cheaper 4.4 BMW V8 as it a VERY free revving engine but overall the Jag engined car is obviously a better buy. |
||
![]() |
|
ebajema Member Since: 24 Mar 2011 Location: New Plymouth Posts: 4782 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I find the 5.0 SC quite instantly there when you want to and also able to drive "smoothly" and "stately" if you like |
||
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
|
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
