![]() | Home > General (L405) > Are early 3.0 that much more unreliable than the 4.4? |
![]() ![]() |
|
|
Chalky Member Since: 10 Feb 2018 Location: Marshfield, Bath Posts: 922 ![]() ![]() |
I've had 6 LR cars with the 3.0l engine and never had a problem with any of them. The latest MHEW is brilliant so I'd recommend the engine. It is economical, smooth and quick. All LR cars from 1984
|
||
![]() |
|
diesel Dave Member Since: 14 Aug 2015 Location: Stockport Posts: 472 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It’s a real lottery with the 3.0 v6, there’s thousands out there running perfectly with over 100k miles on them. On the negative side, I work for an LR Indie and these along with the 2.0 ingenium cars are the ones we see the most of with engine failure, the V8 on the other hand seems to be more robust and I’ve only seen one failure in 5 years, that was due to poor service history. If you do go for a 3.0 my best advise would be a full service history essential and keep your oil changed every 6 to 8 k miles at the most. Also if you can get a warranty its worth it. |
||
![]() |
|
SS.Lyria Member Since: 01 Dec 2016 Location: London Posts: 261 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I owned a 3.0 litre Disco for a few years and had no issues. I bottled it and got rid of it when a friend had his crank snap on his 3.0 litre at 2 years and less than 30k miles, luckily for him LR picked up the £20k bill. Mine was out of warranty and I didn’t want to risk it.
|
||
![]() |
|
Stefanbutler Member Since: 03 Dec 2024 Location: Belfast Posts: 8 ![]() ![]() |
I'm getting the feeling that 4.4 is a safer bet?
|
||
![]() |
|
diesel Dave Member Since: 14 Aug 2015 Location: Stockport Posts: 472 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yes same issues in the sport, in fact the sport has the most powerful unit mapped to 306 BHP so is under more stress. L405 has two variants at 254BHP single turbo and 275 BHP twin turbo. |
||
![]() |
|
Dolphinboy Member Since: 07 Dec 2009 Location: Bristol Posts: 3214 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Also the 4.4 has the stability control system which makes cornering so muuuuuuuch better.
|
||
![]() |
|
CS Member Since: 14 Apr 2015 Location: Edinburgh Posts: 1399 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The dealers I use have stopped selling second hand 4.4s as one can no longer get replacement engines (other than from a donor car), they do still sell second hand 3.0 V6 (or D300/350) 405s. Only Range Rovers since 1988 |
||
![]() |
|
Vogue Member Since: 31 Jan 2008 Location: on the hill Posts: 3777 ![]() ![]() |
I’ve owned 3 x 4.4 V8 Diesels - all absolutely faultless - all serviced by main agent on the dot.
|
||
![]() |
|
tomo141 Member Since: 22 Aug 2017 Location: UK Posts: 91 ![]() ![]() |
So the opposite for me, my 3.0 was issue free for 4 years, not one warranty claim. It had done 60000 miles when i changed for the 4.4 V8. It was as new with only a few thousand miles on clock. 18 months in and engine failed with 25000 miles and needed replacement. As mentioned, LR no longer make the 4.4 V8 diesel.
|
||
![]() |
|
Gremlin500 Member Since: 11 Mar 2022 Location: Newcastle, UK Posts: 1644 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The concensus above says that whatever you go for, it’s a lottery.
|
||
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
