Home > General > Much more expensive to run than a RRS? |
|
|
garyRR Member Since: 13 Mar 2021 Location: Hampshire Posts: 1463 |
The Sport is based on the same chassis as the big Range Rover, and all the electrics are identical, so there's really no difference between them in running costs and reliability. There's zero difference in servicing costs and negligible difference in fuel economy. The Sport has the limited slip rear diff, which is a little more expensive to service.
|
||
27th Apr 2024 9:31pm |
|
GrumpyPenguin Member Since: 06 Mar 2024 Location: Thanet, Kent Posts: 30 |
I thought that the RRS used a Discovery chassis & shared a lot with it ? |
||
28th Apr 2024 1:12pm |
|
stan Site Moderator Member Since: 13 Jul 2010 Location: a moderate moderated moderator moderating moderately in moderation Posts: 35262 |
the pre 2013/14 L494 did.... ... - .- -.
|
||
28th Apr 2024 2:05pm |
|
Andy S Member Since: 16 Jun 2013 Location: Sevenoaks Posts: 1015 |
L320 Stan. L494 is the post 2013 RRS. L320 had lots of things in common with the D3/D4. |
||
28th Apr 2024 6:40pm |
|
garyRR Member Since: 13 Mar 2021 Location: Hampshire Posts: 1463 |
The OP is referring to an L494 Sport, which is built on the same platform as the L405 Full Fat. The old Range Rover Sport (L320) pre 2013 was built on a Land Rover Discovery chassis, but did have quite different electrics to the Discovery. For the purposes of this post, there isn't any difference between running costs of the L494 Sport and L405 full fat, because underneath they are practically the same car. 2015 Range Rover Autobiography 4.4 SDV8 |
||
28th Apr 2024 7:18pm |
|
stan Site Moderator Member Since: 13 Jul 2010 Location: a moderate moderated moderator moderating moderately in moderation Posts: 35262 |
pre L494 would have been the L320.. ... - .- -. Y. O. L. O. . |
||
28th Apr 2024 8:13pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis