Advertise on fullfatrr.com »

Home > Dealership & Service Feedback > JLR Parts - Do not buy from
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 2 12>
Print this entire topic · 
Bristol RR



Member Since: 20 May 2023
Location: Bath
Posts: 20

United Kingdom 2012 Range Rover Westminster 4.4 V8 Ipanema Sand
JLR Parts - Do not buy from

Ordered a set of brake pads for my 2012 RR TDV8. Clearly ordered the stets spec pads LR0160069 and received confirmation that this exact part number was ordered.

They shipped pads with a part number that had been superseded a number of times and was subject to an LR TSB meaning the pads needed chamfering to avoid squealing. These pads have been superseded a few times now to the latest ones which I ordered.

I complained saying they hadn't delivered the goods as ordered which was their responsibility under the distance selling regulations and that the part supplied was not fit for purpose as per the TSB.

Completely refused to do anything and basically told me that if I didn't like it I should return them any my cost. I disagree and told tough take it or leave it.

Have returned them now and they gave failed to pay for even the return postage and have the audacity to charge me a re-stocking fee!!!

Please avoid them - Is it worth pursuing in small claims? It's a re-stocking fee and carrier charges of about £50.

So for anyone looking to buy from these people please beware - website is https://jlr.parts

Post #671983 25th Aug 2023 10:53am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
stan
Site Moderator


Member Since: 13 Jul 2010
Location: a moderate moderated moderator moderating moderately in moderation
Posts: 35290

United Kingdom 

many JLR part numbers get updated with new numbers .

if the pads were the same but with different numbers i cant see the problem..

your personnel experience with this company might not be the same as others have had and ranting on that others shouldn't use them is inappropriate .. ... - .- -.




Y. O. L. O.
.


Last edited by stan on 26th Aug 2023 10:24am. Edited 1 time in total

Post #671985 25th Aug 2023 11:20am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Gremlin500



Member Since: 11 Mar 2022
Location: Newcastle, UK
Posts: 1432

United Kingdom 2017 Range Rover Vogue TDV6 Corris Grey

Sorry to hear of your issue, and it’s of little use now, but it may help others in similar circumstances:
Always pay by credit card (not debit card). Take pictures of the order/goods/email correspondence (try to avoid phone calls, due to deniability issues). If no joy from the vendor, report it to your card issuer and ask them to make a chargeback. Most card issuers will review your supporting evidence and credit the balance back to your account quite quickly if valid. You do not have to return the incorrect goods, but keep them available for collection by the vendor, but if you do agree to return them, get proof of delivery.
I have been in similar circumstances with unhelpful vendors, and always got 100% refund via my card issuer, much less stressful than small claims which costs you money.
Not infallible I know, but always check out a “new” supplier on TrustPilot or similar before ordering. Thumbs Up “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” -where’s the fun in that?

Post #671988 25th Aug 2023 11:24am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Bristol RR



Member Since: 20 May 2023
Location: Bath
Posts: 20

United Kingdom 2012 Range Rover Westminster 4.4 V8 Ipanema Sand

Stan - thats the point the pads were different and had been superseded because the originals had issues with squealing which JLR raised a TSB about.

It's not inappropriate - far from it, it's the responsibility of the company selling from distance to supply goods as described. If you describe a part with a certain part number then you expect to receive that as you cannot pick it off a shelf yourself...?

To me this feels like they've bought a load of old parts and are trying to flog them off which I have no issue with but they should make that clear and supply the actual part number ordered.

So in this instance the parts were not as described and also not fit for purpose due to the TSB LR raised about this specific part number.

Post #671991 25th Aug 2023 11:45am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Bristol RR



Member Since: 20 May 2023
Location: Bath
Posts: 20

United Kingdom 2012 Range Rover Westminster 4.4 V8 Ipanema Sand

@gremlin500 - thanks I did pay by card but in two minds whether or not to go after them.

All correspondence is in email including me sending them the TSB from JLR relating to these specific part numbers supplied.

Posting this here mainly for advice b ut also so people can buy from this company with their eyes open.

Post #671992 25th Aug 2023 11:47am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
stan
Site Moderator


Member Since: 13 Jul 2010
Location: a moderate moderated moderator moderating moderately in moderation
Posts: 35290

United Kingdom 

you say the original pads with the part number you ordered were superseded because of squealing [TSB]

so you received a updated pads that dont squeal? ... - .- -.




Y. O. L. O.
.

Post #671993 25th Aug 2023 11:56am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
DrRob



Member Since: 16 Apr 2015
Location: Petersfield, Hampshire
Posts: 4302

United Kingdom 2011 Range Rover Vogue SE TDV8 Buckingham Blue

I personally use either Advanced Factors of Duckworths.
Both are site sponsors so discount and any issues are resolved immediately.
Bow down Thumbs Up Gone to a good home: 2011 4.4 TDV8 Vogue SE Buckingham Blue with Ivory and clear glass = "Rory"
2025MY Defender D350 90 in Silicon Silver on coils
1974 Series 3 Lightweight = "Millie"
Many, many other Landies over the years
My preferred specialist: www.glenrands.co.uk
--------------------------------------------------

Post #671994 25th Aug 2023 12:18pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Haylands



Member Since: 04 Mar 2014
Location: East Yorkshire
Posts: 8195

England 2014 Range Rover Autobiography SDV8 Loire Blue

As Rob says, if you want genuine use our site sponsor Duckworths Land Rover and you get around a 20% discount and free fast postage.... Just email Robin

Robin Hall​
Senior Parts Advisor,
Duckworth Jaguar Land Rover
Market Rasen
T: +44 (0) 1673 842101 | F: +44 (0) 1673 844410
Email: Robin.Hall@duckworth.co.uk

Thumbs Up

Oh, and genuine pads are made by Jurid and are much cheaper if you buy them from somewhere other than the main dealer... Pete

__________________________________________________
2014 L405 Autobiography SDV8 4.4 Loire Blue Ebony interior
2011 L322 Vogue SE 4.4 TDV8 Baltic Blue. Parchment over Navy Interior. Sold
2012 L322 Autobiography 5.0 Supercharged Ipanema Sand, Jet Interior. Sold
2002 L322 Vogue 4.4 V8 Epson Green, Ivory over Aspen Interior (Fatty Offroader) Sold
-Click for Project Fatty off roader-

Post #671997 25th Aug 2023 1:17pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Ennoch



Member Since: 26 Dec 2015
Location: Scotland
Posts: 109

Bristol RR wrote:
Stan - thats the point the pads were different and had been superseded because the originals had issues with squealing which JLR raised a TSB about.

It's not inappropriate - far from it, it's the responsibility of the company selling from distance to supply goods as described. If you describe a part with a certain part number then you expect to receive that as you cannot pick it off a shelf yourself...?

To me this feels like they've bought a load of old parts and are trying to flog them off which I have no issue with but they should make that clear and supply the actual part number ordered.

So in this instance the parts were not as described and also not fit for purpose due to the TSB LR raised about this specific part number.


I initially thought you were complaining about getting the later parts and thought you were being unreasonable but reading it again it seems you've been sent the older parts that have been superseded several times despite ordering the latest part. I think on the basis of not only that but their response I would be inclined to speak to the cc company. By all means still sell the old parts but don't pretend they're the newer ones, that to me is pretty fraudulent even if ultimately they 'fit'. If they'd have been honest I'm guessing you'd have sourced them elsewhere so their behaviour is pretty deceptive.

Post #671998 25th Aug 2023 1:22pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
JMC



Member Since: 01 Feb 2009
Location: Aberdeen-Angus
Posts: 755

Scotland 2012 Range Rover Westminster TDV8 Orkney Grey

Bear in mind that part numbers can change for a variety of reasons - sometimes even if it's just a change in the packaging for the same parts. The older I get, the more I realise that people confuse wrinkles for wisdom Smile

Post #672004 25th Aug 2023 2:03pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
stan
Site Moderator


Member Since: 13 Jul 2010
Location: a moderate moderated moderator moderating moderately in moderation
Posts: 35290

United Kingdom 

Ennoch's deduction makes more sense now... ... - .- -.




Y. O. L. O.
.

Post #672005 25th Aug 2023 2:13pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
p38arover



Member Since: 16 Dec 2015
Location: Western Sydney
Posts: 1526

Australia 

stan wrote:

your personnel experience with this company might be the same as others have had and ranting on that others shouldn't use them is inappropriate ..


Should there be a "not" after "might"?

BTW, that part no. LR0160069 seems to have too many digits. Should it be LR160069 which are incredibly expensive brake pads?

Is it really that hard to chamfer the pads as per the TSB? Do you have a copy of the TSB. My new pads squeal so maybe the TSB will work for me. I can see from the pic for LR160069 on JLR's website, that the chamfer is significant.

Click image to enlarge
 Ron B. VK2OTC
2003 L322 V8 Auto
2007 Yamaha XJR1300
Previous: 1983, 1986 RRC; 1995, 1996 P38A; 1995 Disco1; 1984 V8 County 110; Series IIA

Post #672038 26th Aug 2023 7:47am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
stan
Site Moderator


Member Since: 13 Jul 2010
Location: a moderate moderated moderator moderating moderately in moderation
Posts: 35290

United Kingdom 

my post edited.. Embarassed ... - .- -.




Y. O. L. O.
.

Post #672052 26th Aug 2023 10:25am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Vogue



Member Since: 31 Jan 2008
Location: on the hill
Posts: 3742

United Kingdom 

Just get your credit card company to do a chargeback, you can do it online. I got ripped off buying a dog box - they ignored my emails and wouldn’t refund - I got a full refund through my credit card within days 2021 L405 Vogue SE 4.4 V8 DIESEL ~ #17

Post #672066 26th Aug 2023 4:57pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Bristol RR



Member Since: 20 May 2023
Location: Bath
Posts: 20

United Kingdom 2012 Range Rover Westminster 4.4 V8 Ipanema Sand

Stan - yes they supplied the older part number and refused to change despite advertising. The new part number and confirming via email order confirmation.

P38rover - yes but that’s not the point. I ordered the later part that needed no chamfering not the outdated part number that did need it. Yes I have a copy of the TSB a and sent that to them, clearly states the part number and clearly shows that it needs an amount of chamfering which didn’t seem to work as they superseded a few versions.

Ennoch - yes absolutely. I ordered a specific part number. They confirmed that part number via email. They then supplied a different part number which was several versions out of date and was associated with a TSB because of excessive squealing.

Haylands - yes used to use Duckworths but have tended to online suppliers recently I guess this is the price you pay.

Vogue - will call cc company on Tuesday to recover the £50 I’ve lost here

Post #672073 26th Aug 2023 9:10pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 2 12>
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
fullfatrr.com RSS Feed - All Forums


Switch to Mobile site