Anyone any idea how to get the format better, when I type it in there’s loads of spaces between the mpg and the model and the name. Would be good to make it easier to read.

To keep your spacing, you can wrap your text with "code" tags, e.g.

I would try and make some reference to if the figures were on the dash or calculated as the can vary wildly. 25.9 indicated was actually 23.5 at the pumps. The diesels are worse for this especially when remapped or with tuning boxes. Normally makes 20% optimistic. Also driving like a saint for my entry? I'd say driving normally to the speed limit! 2005 E60 M5
2006 L322 4.2 SC
2020 Tesla Model S Long Range
--------
2004 L322 4.4 Vogue, 2019 NP300 Navara, 2016 NP300 Navara, 2002 L322 4.4 HSE, 2006 (MY07) L322 S/C ,2001 330Ci Sport Track Car, 2005 650i Coupe, 2001 P38 Vogue, 2003 530i Sport Touring, 1999 P38 4.6 HSE, 2002 E39 M5, 1995 300zx TT Slicktop, 1997 M3 Evo, 1992 300zx TT Targa, 1998 323i Coupe

I hadn’t appreciated it was as much as 20% inaccuracy.

Daft question which I didn’t ask is everyone running regular fuel or super? as that will make a difference in the mpg.

Also Thankyou to everyone who has provided a number, it’s an interesting array of economy in there, as long as you take it with a degree of error on dash/actual, driving style, road type and fuel variants.

Last edited by Slow progress on 15th Jul 2021 8:23am. Edited 1 time in total

This is fascinating, very helpful seeing the figures in a list - thanks "Slow" !

What's really surprised me is the noticable difference between the 5.0 and 4.2 figures - would be interested in more data to see if that is consistent.

Is it worth pasting this list into your first post in this thread so it's easier to find in future?

Slow progress wrote:

Daft question which I didn’t ask is everyone running regular fuel or super? as that will make a difference in the mpg.

Always premium fuel, mostly Shell V Power

Won't get into that argument again but I run mine on 95 as that's what it recommends in the manual...

One thing to note is how accurate is the speedo, mine, with the slightly larger 55 aspect tyres is absolutely spot on at 70mph when checked with GPS, it was about 4-5mph (7-8%) under reading with 50 aspect. This will effect the distance recorded as well...

Seems to me that you need to just note the results individuals get but don't be surprised if you don't get it...

Post 2010 322's are better than the earlier ones, and the newer the 405 the better... just as you would expect really...

DJ... the main reason the 5.0S/C is better than the 4.2S/C is because it is a direct injection engine, this makes a big difference to power, emissions and frugality.  Pete

__________________________________________________
2014 L405 Autobiography SDV8 4.4 Loire Blue Ebony interior
2011 L322 Vogue SE 4.4 TDV8 Baltic Blue. Parchment over Navy Interior. Sold
2012 L322 Autobiography 5.0 Supercharged Ipanema Sand, Jet Interior. Sold
2002 L322 Vogue 4.4 V8 Epson Green, Ivory over Aspen Interior (Fatty Offroader) Sold
-Click for Project Fatty off roader-

ah, thanks yes that would make sense, of course there'd be more to it than just increased capacity.
"Today I Learned"...

=DJ= I think you’ve just suggested an entirely new thread;

“Today I learned” think that would run and run!

I think that's best left on Reddit...