I was told by my dealer the vogue's asking price is £65k...Think I'll pick one second hand in a couple of years time

Do you guys think I could at least upgrade the rear lights? Look like it could be interchangable with current model....

Don't the LED lights needs special looms and power supplies? Discovery 4 HSE
1998 110 TUM HS FFR Hard Top XD WOLF
1982 Series 3 Hard Top

*Gone:L462 D5 HSE LUX, L663 Defender 110 HSE, Discovery 3 HSE, 2014MY Range Rover Sport 5.0 Supercharged AB Dynamic; L405 Exec Vogue SE 4.4, 5.0 Supercharged Autobiography, Defender TDCi XS CSW, Defender TD5 HT, Vogue SE TDV8, Vogue TD6, RRSport SC 4.2V8, Classic 3.9 Vogue Auto, Land Rover Series 3 SWB

MICK wrote:

Anyone heard of prices yet ..........

Have been reading a few differrent forums on the the New FFRR a lot of people not too taken on by it . just a few GRUMPS .................


More distractions for someone driving one of the most potently destructive single person carrying objects on the road. More toys, more weight, more power to haul it around at unstoppable speed. Sorry but at LR the clock seems to be going backward not forward........

Land Rover is targeting Bentley levels of opulence with this revised version of the third-generation Range Rover.

Truth be told, I think they would have been better placing the time and effort into the LRX and getting that ready and out .


http://www.ovalnews.com/2009/04/2010-range...party.html

But surely if that's what you want you should be able to buy it? At the end of the day, if you dont want all the gadgets etc, then buy a Disco/Freeloader/Defender. If you want the best money can buy, buy a Range Rover.

That's the great thing about Land Rovers, if you want posh you've got the Range Rover, if you have tons of kids you can have the disco, if your poor then you can have a freelander and if your mental you can buy a defender!

The more gadgets the better, and hopefully the new binnacle wont suffer from dead pixels! 

Nowt wrong with Defenders. Do exactly what they're designed to do very well. Shame about the Transit engine these days though.

Never understood Freelanders though, for the same money you can get a decent spec estate (assuming that you're the 99.9% who never take them off road. . . ever).

Not sure about the grille on the MY10. Looks a bit wet to me. Loosing the agressive look a bit.

dan_uk_1984 wrote:

The more gadgets the better, and hopefully the new binnacle wont suffer from dead pixels!

I'm not going to name the person who works for LR, as it might get him in trouble.

He openly criticise(to me anyway)that until LR could build their cars like the Mercs, they shouldn't go all hi-tech with TFT screen, have enough electrical gremlins already, won't surprise him if the new dash would black out on new model owners...

Larry wrote:

Nowt wrong with Defenders.

Meant mental in an affectionate way! 

Larry wrote:

Not sure about the grille on the MY10. Looks a bit wet to me. Loosing the agressive look a bit.

Bang on Larry - The front end looks a bit... well... how do you say... w k! Nowhere near as good looking as the existing FFRR.

Love the look of the new interior: especially the new screen and the binnacle - would like to see for real, just to be certain.

still think they should have gone down this road ..........

http://www2.diariomotor.com/imagenes/range...der_02.jpg

http://typeballa.files.wordpress.com/2009/...er_015.jpg

kin wrote:

dan_uk_1984 wrote:

The more gadgets the better, and hopefully the new binnacle wont suffer from dead pixels!

I'm not going to name the person who works for LR, as it might get him in trouble.

He openly criticise(to me anyway)that until LR could build their cars like the Mercs, they shouldn't go all hi-tech with TFT screen, have enough electrical gremlins already, won't surprise him if the new dash would black out on new model owners...

Even Mercedes sometimes gets it wrong with the hi-tec stuff , the wife has had nothing but trouble with her Sat Nav,Telephone,command screen in her car.

Switch the car on and it automatically jumps from cd playing to the radio , make a phone call from the screen and it jumps to tv playing ..............

MICK wrote:

still think they should have gone down this road ..........

http://www2.diariomotor.com/imagenes/range...der_02.jpg

http://typeballa.files.wordpress.com/2009/...er_015.jpg

So you reckon they might go down the road of changing the design.

I have enquired about availability and price on the 2010 Mdl, and would rather hold off if they were going to radically change the appearance ...........

Here at dcc4x4 we are currently working on sourcing the parts to facelfit all earlier Range Rovers to the
2010 supercharged spec and hope to be ready to start the conversions within the next few months, the rear lights are not plug and play according to a good friend of mine, unlike the current supercharged rear lights but we are looking to adapt them to fit, cost of the full conversion including the side vents and rear lamps is TBA at present.

Few more pic's

Click image to enlarge

Click image to enlarge

Click image to enlarge

Click image to enlarge

Click image to enlarge

Click image to enlarge

Click image to enlarge

Click image to enlarge

Aaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh! A freelander style Start/Stop button!!!!

Can't stand 'em. Much prefer to turn a key (must be getting old!)

DCC4x4 wrote:

Here at dcc4x4 we are currently working on sourcing the parts to facelfit all earlier Range Rovers to the
2010 supercharged spec and hope to be ready to start the conversions within the next few months, the rear lights are not plug and play according to a good friend of mine, unlike the current supercharged rear lights but we are looking to adapt them to fit, cost of the full conversion including the side vents and rear lamps is TBA at present.