Home > General > The London Toxin Charge Diesel FFRR Confused .com |
|
|
anorakmark Member Since: 18 Jan 2014 Location: Chatham Kent Posts: 121 |
Moving forward, yes a great move & the wife would love it, enough room to install a small hob & sink unit, oh and a dressing table and mirror. This would make every wife feel at home. I just hope my wife does not see this post. |
||
26th Oct 2017 9:50am |
|
bertie1 Member Since: 30 Sep 2017 Location: kent Posts: 100 |
|
||
26th Oct 2017 9:59am |
|
anorakmark Member Since: 18 Jan 2014 Location: Chatham Kent Posts: 121 |
The road repair programme in London is a total joke, also the introduction of the cycle super highway which reduces the carriageway dramatically. These cycle lanes are hardly used to justify the miions spent building them. Once again, big wigs sitting behind a desk and not in touch with reality. |
||
26th Oct 2017 1:46pm |
|
aneurysm1 Member Since: 12 Dec 2012 Location: burnley Posts: 202 |
To reply to the OP about the 4.4 petrol not being subject to the charge, that may be because the charge is aimed at diesels who kick out Nitrous oxides which are killing more people than the CO2 emissions. So the extra CO2 from the petrol is not as bad as the huge amounts of crap that come out of diesels. |
||
26th Oct 2017 3:28pm |
|
anorakmark Member Since: 18 Jan 2014 Location: Chatham Kent Posts: 121 |
The issue is not about the black soot pushed out the tail pipe, I fully understand the dangers. The topic is about the charge being a stealth tax. If Sadiq Khan was that concerned about pollution then ban diesels 24/7. If they are so dangerous why allow them after 18.00 hrs and all day weekends and bank holidays not just the hours of business to hit the hard working public. If it was such a big issue as they state then a blanket ban on diesels. I don't see the railways being penalised for polluting diesel locomotives, Air craft emitting dangerous toxings or HGV and PCV. It's a clear case of hit the easiest, the motorists. |
||
26th Oct 2017 3:58pm |
|
Philip Member Since: 05 Jan 2010 Location: UK Posts: 2580 |
It’s not a petrol/diesel split - they both have to be Euro 4/IV to avoid the charge. |
||
26th Oct 2017 6:25pm |
|
Sandyt Member Since: 07 Nov 2013 Location: Wraysbury Windsor Posts: 2269 |
It is age I think 11 years old or less |
||
26th Oct 2017 6:28pm |
|
Philip Member Since: 05 Jan 2010 Location: UK Posts: 2580 |
As above, it’s compliance with Euro 4/IV, so a requirement for new type approvals from Jan 2005 and then everything from Jan 2006 (although some older cars comply). |
||
26th Oct 2017 7:54pm |
|
rodp Member Since: 09 Apr 2017 Location: The Black Country Posts: 318 |
Oh but they are very much in touch with reality, this will bring in hundreds of thousands of £££. And the cut off in an evening will give them the excuse that they have allowed for loading and unloading of goods on trucks that don't comply. If anyone questions why trains etc are allowed in then they'll just say we allowed for trucks but trains have to stick to a time schedule so we can't penalise them. As said in an earlier post, London voted the jerk in, now deal with it. |
||
27th Oct 2017 5:00pm |
|
Weegie Member Since: 09 Jun 2014 Location: East Sussex Posts: 3241 |
TBH don't think it made any difference to the charge whoever they voted in. It would still have happened. John
|
||
27th Oct 2017 5:59pm |
|
Clivefog Member Since: 23 Aug 2015 Location: Bristol Posts: 354 |
Just ran my 2003 4.4 petrol through the toxic charge and it is liable to the charge. |
||
27th Oct 2017 6:03pm |
|
bertie1 Member Since: 30 Sep 2017 Location: kent Posts: 100 |
these charges are great but there must be loads whom have invested in a car and cant afford to just replace them deffo stealth tax . But they just want cars and vans in London , likely I don't go to the smoke much now ,but public transport is so unrealible especially when your disabled |
||
28th Oct 2017 12:30pm |
|
RR2008HSE Member Since: 06 Jan 2013 Location: British Columbia Posts: 2932 |
Would a protest where everyone commutes by horseback or handsome cab work? It would leave them with some pollution of a highly particulate nature, but rather larger than 2.5 microns. |
||
28th Oct 2017 10:40pm |
|
anorakmark Member Since: 18 Jan 2014 Location: Chatham Kent Posts: 121 |
Now that sounds like a plan |
||
29th Oct 2017 7:00am |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis