Home > General (L405) > Low miler l322 or L405 |
|
|
|
dolph34 Member Since: 14 Sep 2015 Location: Kildare Posts: 1724 |
Just my pennies worth , what do you drive now ? Personally i would pick a l322 and get an AB. A l405 maybe be a better car in general but you would get a top spec AB in a l322 with change as opposed to a l405 with a 3.0 engine that while incredibly smooth didnt even feel as strong as my 3.6. When i drove one
|
||
13th Jan 2017 3:08pm |
|
Basilfawlty Member Since: 18 Oct 2015 Location: Cheshire Posts: 655 |
There seems to be some people who aren't keen on the 3.0 but I've owned three and they are great. Sure the 4.4 is great too in a different way and I'll probably buy one later this year but don't be put off by those who haven't driven one regularly. And if you are unsure about performance, just remember the 3.0 L405 is quicker to sixty than the 3.6 and the 4.4 l322. |
||
14th Jan 2017 12:09am |
|
jimbob1972 Member Since: 03 Apr 2012 Location: new forest Posts: 11 |
Driving exactly the same as you! |
||
14th Jan 2017 8:41am |
|
paulmoran2 Member Since: 27 Nov 2013 Location: Leeds Posts: 1422 |
The 405 is an excellent piece or engineering but is far less DIY friendly so will therefore be comparatively more expense to maintain.
|
||
14th Jan 2017 9:02am |
|
verydisco Member Since: 10 Dec 2009 Location: UK/US Posts: 2952 |
^^^Absolutely. I replaced the Xenon bulb on my L322 this summer (it did die on the way to the MOT - seriously!) I think I paid circa £60 is for Philips genuine ones from a specialist as I needed it that day. LR didnt have them (they were arount £90 IIRC.)
|
||
14th Jan 2017 9:16am |
|
Welshhope Member Since: 19 Jan 2015 Location: Cymru Posts: 16 |
One additional item I would consider would be the likely mileage being driven on an annual basis. At the moment for less than 35k there are only two L322 on the LR website Approved scheme. The L405 are more common at main dealers with the 2 year warranty pack. As I drive at least 35k miles each year, the L405 would be a better bet, even given the initial outlay.
|
||
14th Jan 2017 3:07pm |
|
dolph34 Member Since: 14 Sep 2015 Location: Kildare Posts: 1724 |
Hi , as you drive the same as i do , a 12 AB or SE would be a big step up wirh toys and gearbox , etc.
|
||
14th Jan 2017 4:54pm |
|
RR2008HSE Member Since: 06 Jan 2013 Location: British Columbia Posts: 2932 |
The L322 is a lot farther down its depreciation curve than the L405. It also costs significantly less. Advantage L322 Both are very nice cars. Yes, the L405 is based on tech that is a decade newer. It should damn well be better. Advantage L405. It all depends on: which one you like; which one you can afford; and how much $/£/€ you want tied up in a car. To me, the L322 is a fantastic luxury and I love it. The L405 is not in my budget, but I'd be very happy if it was. |
||
15th Jan 2017 12:38am |
|
SKOT Member Since: 24 Oct 2012 Location: Milton Keynes Posts: 792 |
A hard one, the L322 is a very classic, iconic design. I don't think the L405 will age so gracefully and even today I struggle to tell the difference between an L405 and L494 but for the time being I think they are utterly fabulous!
|
||
23rd Jan 2017 6:50pm |
|
iconoclast Member Since: 20 Oct 2015 Location: In, Out & Around... Posts: 35 |
The L322 is still part of the classic and iconic RR box design however with that comes outdated chassis and tech. I like both but for different reasons. The L322 is the last of an era and it's simplicity is what I admire the most. It rides well, it has grunt, it doesn't disappoint. The L405 is more current, the weight loss is noticeable especially when pushing the vehicle in the twisties, the minor improvement in fuel efficiency is a plus and the acceleration is improved. In the end, it is your cash, your car, your call. https://instagram.com/_.iconoclast/ |
||
30th Jan 2017 2:41am |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis