Home > Off Topic - Other Cars > New Discovery pricing |
|
|
marsie Member Since: 30 Apr 2010 Location: sheffield Posts: 916 |
I like the looks and the interior but cannot understand why they have offset the rear numberplate when they didn't need to . Would have looked better in the centre
|
||
1st Oct 2016 9:06am |
|
kingpleb Member Since: 07 Jun 2011 Location: Maybe here. Maybe there, I get everywhere! Posts: 8455 |
Pricing structure is simple, they asked a load of people who have no clue what real money is what they thought they cost them and then priced accordingly knowing those that want to stay LR will just take the next model down the ladder to stay in a green oval and those that can't or won't will burger off to a different manufacturer.
|
||
3rd Oct 2016 7:55am |
|
miggit Member Since: 12 Jul 2014 Location: Milton Keynes Posts: 3657 |
"The new Discovery is 141mm longer than the previous model, but narrower and lower as well. "
|
||
3rd Oct 2016 8:52am |
|
Red Merle Member Since: 19 Sep 2016 Location: Cornwall Posts: 2158 |
That's because, when they looked at the old Disco 4 and wondered what the most important aspect of the car was to all of its current owners (such as the massive and cubic load space, the flat load floor, the eminently practical split tailgate and the fact that it still looks like a traditional Land Rover), they hit on the thing that we've all been asking for: an offset numberplate! |
||
3rd Oct 2016 10:37am |
|
marsie Member Since: 30 Apr 2010 Location: sheffield Posts: 916 |
|
||
6th Oct 2016 7:54am |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis