Home > Off Topic > IT thoughts - Network Attached Storage |
|
|
mjdronfield Member Since: 04 Nov 2011 Location: Derbyshire Posts: 7842 |
I am getting fed up of having 4 or 5 USB external disks kicking about, from 250GB to 3TB ones.
|
||
15th Mar 2015 1:35pm |
|
JackRegan Member Since: 20 Oct 2012 Location: Wirral Posts: 237 |
I've always relied on a Windows Home Server, 2008 then 2011 but when my machine went pop last year I decided to replace it with a NAS.
|
||
15th Mar 2015 2:39pm |
|
gregdav Member Since: 26 May 2014 Location: just north of stafford Posts: 1077 |
|
||
15th Mar 2015 7:19pm |
|
johnboyairey Member Since: 11 Jan 2013 Location: surrey Posts: 2035 |
edit |
||
15th Mar 2015 9:10pm |
|
Haylands Member Since: 04 Mar 2014 Location: East Yorkshire Posts: 8339 |
Mark, you lost me at "I am getting" !!!!
|
||
15th Mar 2015 9:23pm |
|
JackRegan Member Since: 20 Oct 2012 Location: Wirral Posts: 237 |
After a period without access the Qnap powers down the discs so you only hear the internal power supply which is quite quiet.
|
||
15th Mar 2015 9:32pm |
|
mjdronfield Member Since: 04 Nov 2011 Location: Derbyshire Posts: 7842 |
Many thanks for the feedback.
|
||
15th Mar 2015 10:05pm |
|
Alistair Member Since: 11 Feb 2011 Location: Peterborough / Bordeaux / Andorra Posts: 7967 |
I was advised specifically not to fill it with identical discs all at once - the theory being that they would tend to fail around the same time - so I started with 2, then added another 2 a year or so later - I don't know how true, but it seemed feasible and I didn't need all the capacity day 1 anyway |
||
15th Mar 2015 10:14pm |
|
stcstc31 Member Since: 01 Jul 2014 Location: dublin Posts: 209 |
Be VERY careful, most lower end nas products are not as robust as you would think
|
||
16th Mar 2015 7:21am |
|
mzplcg Member Since: 26 May 2010 Location: Warwickshire. England. The Commonwealth. Posts: 4029 |
I use a QNAP TS-853 which is an 8 bay unit. Wasn't cheap but can cope with stuff like hot-spare disks and so on. Mine is full of 2TB drives at present but can be upgraded as required. Expect to ay 5 or 6 hundred quid without disks, but it is a unit designed for small companies rather than home users. Reliability seems to be very good. |
||
16th Mar 2015 8:35am |
|
KurtVerbose Member Since: 08 Aug 2010 Location: Les Arses Posts: 5848 |
^ This. I use NAS and it's great, but it's not the only backup I have. Never rely on a single backup, especially at a single location. |
||
16th Mar 2015 9:19am |
|
mzplcg Member Since: 26 May 2010 Location: Warwickshire. England. The Commonwealth. Posts: 4029 |
^ Yep, so my NAS is Linux based (as most of them seem to be now) which means one can load the Linux version of the Crashplan client into the main service console of the NAS. I did mine using SSH and now (having bought the Crashplan Unlimited service) my NAS backs itself up to the CP servers on an ongoing basis.
|
||
16th Mar 2015 10:41am |
|
nobbyclark Member Since: 16 Sep 2014 Location: Cumbria Posts: 131 |
I have Buffalo and Netgear NAS drives. Both are great at storing lots of data, but not what I would call quick, especially when accessed remotely over the net. Had the Buffalo for about 5 years and it's never missed a beat, but the Netgear has a very buggy OS. Synology seem to make good stuff so I am looking at the DS213 air. |
||
16th Mar 2015 11:44am |
|
Alistair Member Since: 11 Feb 2011 Location: Peterborough / Bordeaux / Andorra Posts: 7967 |
Spot on - everything really important to me is also on a USB disc in my desk drawer at work I transfer stuff on my laptop, so the USB drive never comes home and I always have an off-site backup |
||
16th Mar 2015 6:54pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis