[url]http://jalopnik.com/maybe-you-shouldn-t-buy-a-used-luxury-car-for-the-price-1654611839[/url] Should've been old enough to know better...doh!
Current 2010 5.0 SC Autobiography
Previous 2006 TD6 Vogue SE
Previous 1998 P38 4.6 Vogue Autobiography 50 (No 10)

Linky no worky  2008 MY Supercharged
Rimini Red / Jet
four zone climate
remote park heater
and no ugly kid windows.
magnus satis quod turpis satis

http://jalopnik.com/maybe-you-shouldn-t-bu...1654611839 Should've been old enough to know better...doh!
Current 2010 5.0 SC Autobiography
Previous 2006 TD6 Vogue SE
Previous 1998 P38 4.6 Vogue Autobiography 50 (No 10)

Interesting read....... Especially as I have had 2 E34 BMW M5's and keep looking at used Audi RS6's......

 2011 Range Rover Vogue SE 4.4 TDV8

Previous cars :
2003 Range Rover Vogue TD6
1999 Discovery Td5 ES
1995 BMW M5 3.8 6 speed
1992 Range Rover 3.9 Efi Vogue
1992 BMW M5 3.8
1988 BMW 735i SE
1989 Ford Sierra XR4x4 2.9i
1981 Ford Fiesta Supersport

See the trouble you can get into if you don't use man maths

"I say this because I have many acquaintances who own Honda Civics, and Ford Fusions, and Nissan Altimas, and in talking to these people......" unquote

This guy just has the wrong friends....

Wrong way to look at things.... no one buys a luxury car because it makes sense, of course we'd all be better off if we drove a Citroen C1 1.0 but where's the fun in that?  Now: BMW 640d M Sport, Alpine White
Gone: Range Rover 4.4 V8 Vogue, Zambezi Silver, Charcoal Oxford Leather
Also: Mk1 Audi TT 1.8T Quattro, Brilliant Black
[URL=]

Click image to enlarge

If it was value for money at the forefront of our minds when buying a leather clad comfortable off roader we would actuall all be driving either a Kia sorento or Hyundai Santa-fe.......

We don't obviously care about value for money, quite blatantly........

We just like driving the best 4x4xfar..... There is nothing that can't be fixed with a hammer😜😜
FFRR 4.4 SDV8 Autobiography Santorini Black.
Fiat 500x 1.4 multiair Lounge 2015
2010 LR D4 Commercial 2.7 TDV6

I'm not so sure. I recon I have value for money, whereas the others just have cheapness, and not as much bang for your buck, if you consider what the ff is new.

Pound for pound, I'm sure we get more out of it. We have cars with soul, heritage and character. I would say you can't buy that, but TATA did.......

Other cheaper alternatives are fine, but you have to actually be sitting in it when going from A to B, which would grind with me I'm afraid.

I wonder if people would still buy those cars if they didn't have a warranty, as that what seems to drive people that are not so into their cars.

I find that generally, if you are not interested in something, you are not very good at it. I see this all the time on the roads..... You can tell by the car being driven......

Saying that, I spent a few years doing Quality Audits on suppliers, and if you want a Focus, and are given a Rolls Royce, they have not met the requirements....... 2011 Range Rover Vogue SE 4.4 TDV8

Previous cars :
2003 Range Rover Vogue TD6
1999 Discovery Td5 ES
1995 BMW M5 3.8 6 speed
1992 Range Rover 3.9 Efi Vogue
1992 BMW M5 3.8
1988 BMW 735i SE
1989 Ford Sierra XR4x4 2.9i
1981 Ford Fiesta Supersport

northernmonkeyjones wrote:

If it was value for money at the forefront of our minds when buying a leather clad comfortable off roader we would actuall all be driving either a Kia sorento or Hyundai Santa-fe.......

We don't obviously care about value for money, quite blatantly........

We just like driving the best 4x4xfar.....

Father's wife had two Hyundais including a Santa Fe. They hated them and they didn't last long before they were replaced. They may be cheaper than Land Rovers, but I don't remember them being any more reliable.

Good points,, mjdronfield.