Home > Wheels & Tyres > Been Looking at these |
|
|
JOKER Member Since: 11 Sep 2008 Location: Sconnie Botland Posts: 15876 |
Do you Gents reckon they would take the weight of a FF ….
|
||
19th Apr 2012 7:01pm |
|
stan Site Moderator Member Since: 13 Jul 2010 Location: a moderate moderated moderator moderating moderately in moderation Posts: 35274 |
i wouldnt risk it mick, wrong size tyre as well.... ... - .- -.
|
||
19th Apr 2012 7:06pm |
|
Alistair Member Since: 11 Feb 2011 Location: Peterborough / Bordeaux / Andorra Posts: 7925 |
Not sure why you would but each to their own
|
||
19th Apr 2012 7:08pm |
|
paul r Member Since: 27 Feb 2012 Location: Nantwich Posts: 213 |
Noooooooooo!! |
||
19th Apr 2012 7:13pm |
|
Lolo Member Since: 16 Feb 2012 Location: Leinster Posts: 608 |
Awe no, don't do it.. U shOuldnt mess with perfection. |
||
19th Apr 2012 8:34pm |
|
Bellini Member Since: 11 Jan 2012 Location: Berkshire Posts: 2261 |
Hell, it's your FF and not mine.
|
||
20th Apr 2012 5:43am |
|
33CHINACARS Member Since: 14 Apr 2011 Location: Tyrendarra, Victoria, Australia Posts: 381 |
NO NO NO YUK. Dont think tyres are rated high enough weight wise either
|
||
20th Apr 2012 3:36pm |
|
duckworthparts Site Sponsor Member Since: 30 Jun 2011 Location: Market Rasen, Lincolnshire Posts: 5217 |
could affect warranty claims aswell You can paypal direct using - www.paypal.me/duckworthparts
|
||
20th Apr 2012 3:51pm |
|
mzplcg Member Since: 26 May 2010 Location: Warwickshire. England. The Commonwealth. Posts: 4029 |
If you were seriously considering it Mick you need to ask about the load rating of the wheel (not tyre) and if memory serves, FFRR ones are 925 KG each. SSRR ones are 925 KG and D3 are 940 KG. Anything you buy must meet or exceed this.
Those taller tyres are actually shorter, by 5% of the width. Standard FFRR tyres are 255/55/19, whereas SSRR uses the 255/50/19 quoted, the middle number being the wall height as a percentage of the tyre width. So you'd get shorter gearing. The 20" tyres on VSE and S/C models uses the 255/50 size, as a 20" tyre, so 255/50/20. |
||
22nd Apr 2012 7:54am |
|
JOKER Member Since: 11 Sep 2008 Location: Sconnie Botland Posts: 15876 |
Opinions noted guys , just as well I was only looking ... .. So looks like your knowledge is correct once again Dom ....
|
||
22nd Apr 2012 8:52am |
|
Cam-Tech-Craig Member Since: 03 Aug 2011 Location: Gloucestershire Posts: 16284 |
Here is mine when i had 22" wheels in that style fitted...
|
||||
22nd Apr 2012 9:16am |
|
fisha Member Since: 25 Sep 2009 Location: Scotland Posts: 1350 |
Correct me if i'm wrong ...
|
||
22nd Apr 2012 6:08pm |
|
RR8701 Member Since: 11 Aug 2011 Location: East Ayrshire Posts: 380 |
i like them. original design is great but so are some of the designs made aftermarket. just depends which one you pick however they are very nice and as craig has shown they suit the car. |
||
22nd Apr 2012 6:09pm |
|
mzplcg Member Since: 26 May 2010 Location: Warwickshire. England. The Commonwealth. Posts: 4029 |
OK, this subject has been well covered on Disco3, mainly because of D3 and RRS interchangeability, except that the RRS runs on 109 load index and the D3 needs 111. There have been a number of cases of blowouts when greenlaning on RRS tyres with a D3. Do a search and you'll find them. These are not just sidewall blowouts either, there are photos of huge holes in the tread area. There is only one way with tyres. ALWAYS use tyres with a load index of AT LEAST that quoted by the manufacturer of the vehicle. Using under-rated tyres will invalidate insurance, and if you get an astute rozzer who actually does know the difference between his ar5e and his elbow, it'll cost you 3 points (and up to £2500 in fines) for each tyre which is contravening the construction and use regs. A tyre doesn't have to be bald to be illegal !! |
||
22nd Apr 2012 6:53pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis