Home > General > Which One |
|
|
RRUK Site Supporter Member Since: 08 Jun 2007 Location: UK Posts: 6366 |
I can't advise on which one specifically, you have to make that choice yourself, however the TD6 although it IS more sluggish than the TDV6 in your D3, once chipped or remapped it is better than the std TDV6 (IMHO) and not as sluggish, just noisier I guess. (Chipping costs about £450 but the best thing I've ever done to a car)
|
||
13th Sep 2009 10:05am |
|
v40mav Member Since: 29 Nov 2008 Location: West Lothian Posts: 7 |
Good call on waiting - looked at 2 today and they were well absued and overpriced.
|
||
13th Sep 2009 8:20pm |
|
ken Member Since: 22 Aug 2008 Location: On another forum Posts: 936 |
Sorry Mav just to balance a Remapped TD6 is nowhere new a standard TDV6 promise. It will pull the trailer thou with its eyes closed
|
||
14th Sep 2009 5:32am |
|
Full fat not diet Member Since: 16 Nov 2008 Location: Herts Posts: 1209 |
Mav, a member has just put a facelift V8 up for sale in the FS Section. |
||
14th Sep 2009 7:16am |
|
Vogue Member Since: 31 Jan 2008 Location: on the hill Posts: 3736 |
Not wanting to disagree with Ken, yes the TDV6 is smoother than the TD6, but there is absolutely nothing in it in an out an out drag race between the two vehicles - nether vehicle will pull away from the other. How do I Know? we are running 7 LR vehicles - and believe me we have tried it on several occasions - chipped or unchipped!
|
||
15th Sep 2009 8:40am |
|
JMC Member Since: 01 Feb 2009 Location: Aberdeen-Angus Posts: 755 |
Got to disagree there Vogue. An old FFRR TD6 won't even look at a chipped D3 TDV6 in a drag race. In fact, the chipped TDV6 isn't too far off the heels of the standard TDV8 up to about 80mph - after which the V8 just sh*ts all over the V6.
|
||
15th Sep 2009 3:13pm |
|
Paul J. Member Since: 13 Jan 2009 Location: Leafy Cheshire Posts: 278 |
|
||
15th Sep 2009 8:50pm |
|
Vogue Member Since: 31 Jan 2008 Location: on the hill Posts: 3736 |
JMC, Your figures are wrong, Land Rovers own figures for the TD6 are 12.7 sec 0-62 (note not 60), a chipped one will also do it in a shade under 10 seconds - around the same as a TDV6. We are talking fractions of a second here. If it was 3 or 4 seconds, yes, you would notice a discernable difference. I stand by what I said, there is absolutely no difference in a drag race, neither vehicle could pull away from the other, we have done it and I own both and have no axe to grind either way! For your own info - real world figures for a TDV8 are 0-60 in 8.66 seconds and 80 in 14.35 unchipped. The biggest difference comes with the 0-90 mph dash down to around 17.75 seconds - that is where the biggest differenc comes! |
||
15th Sep 2009 9:08pm |
|
ken Member Since: 22 Aug 2008 Location: On another forum Posts: 936 |
Vogue My Fleet
|
||
16th Sep 2009 6:19am |
|
Vogue Member Since: 31 Jan 2008 Location: on the hill Posts: 3736 |
Ken, do the maths a std TDV6 is 12ish seconds to 60 a mapped TD6 is 10 ish may be less. The 3.0 BMW X5 engine has a different tune to the FFRR - different vehicles for different intended purposes. The BM is a road going car with off road capability, the FFRR is an off roader and an excellent road going all rounder that will also tow 3.5 tonnes in luxury. P.S. your not the only one with a LR fleet - most of mine are used off road virtually every day or towing - one of the benefiits of owning land! |
||
16th Sep 2009 8:41am |
|
RRUK Site Supporter Member Since: 08 Jun 2007 Location: UK Posts: 6366 |
Wow, there's a lot of chest beating in this thread.
|
||
16th Sep 2009 9:09am |
|
JMC Member Since: 01 Feb 2009 Location: Aberdeen-Angus Posts: 755 |
I'm not going in for chest beating....... except to mention that my fleet of toys all have my name on the V5's........... The older I get, the more I realise that people confuse wrinkles for wisdom |
||
16th Sep 2009 11:47am |
|
ken Member Since: 22 Aug 2008 Location: On another forum Posts: 936 |
Vogue all I can say is you lucky having land to use them properly one of the very few on here
|
||
16th Sep 2009 5:20pm |
|
Vogue Member Since: 31 Jan 2008 Location: on the hill Posts: 3736 |
hi Ken,
|
||
17th Sep 2009 8:40am |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis