Home > My Range Rover > To LPG or not to LPG |
|
|
rads Member Since: 04 Sep 2011 Location: Herts Posts: 157 |
Not sure what happened there.
|
||
26th Sep 2011 5:56pm |
|
Ludzy Member Since: 27 Oct 2010 Location: Leicester Posts: 191 |
i get about 12 mpg with my SC. havent got the balls to get mine converted. couldnt live with myself if anything went wrong plus i dont have faith in the 2 local converters near me. always seem to backtrack and imfo didnt seem to match up even tho they've converted SC's before.
|
||
26th Sep 2011 6:42pm |
|
CG-SC Member Since: 06 May 2011 Location: Falkirk Posts: 528 |
Yeah, a friend of mine did the conversion for me - he has his own garage - specialises in performance stuff and has done a load of LPG conversions......he is in Dunfermline area. Stolen / Gone: 2006MY Supercharged LPG Autobiography - Zambezi Silver with Sand/Jet/Jet Oxford Leather..... |
||
26th Sep 2011 7:18pm |
|
bozmandb9 Member Since: 06 Dec 2010 Location: Wallingford, Oxfordshire Posts: 1020 |
What Ibrahim discussed with you is how it was done before. He's happy to put the compressor in the RHS under the fuse box, that's what I'm wondering about. It was fine as it was before, except you have to have the compressor upside down for it to fit, which is not ideal for longevity of the compressor. Yes I am using Euro LPG again. Did Arun auto gas recommend the BRC electronic lubrication system? I will anyway, it's a no brainer, but interesting to know what Arun said! Now here's an interesting fact for you. I've purchased a warranty from Warranty Direct, and although they don't cover modifications (i.e. LPG conversions), they do cover damage to insured components consequential from uninsured parts, which means that in theory if an LPG conversion causes my engine to go pop, they'll repair/ replace it! That's what they're saying anyway, and for £40 per month I thought why not! Cheers, David Range Rover-less at the moment - Pining! |
||
26th Sep 2011 7:44pm |
|
rads Member Since: 04 Sep 2011 Location: Herts Posts: 157 |
I like the detachable bit of the tow bar stored in the rhs cubbyhole, so that's out for me. Any reason to worry about the compressor being upside down?
|
||
26th Sep 2011 9:27pm |
|
bozmandb9 Member Since: 06 Dec 2010 Location: Wallingford, Oxfordshire Posts: 1020 |
Don't really know about compressor, it could overheat, not running the way it was designed to, but not sure it'll create any problem, certainly none in the short term. The alternative on the RHS would not be in the cubby hole, it would be forward of that! Range Rover-less at the moment - Pining! |
||
26th Sep 2011 10:47pm |
|
BigJ Member Since: 16 Mar 2011 Location: North Yorkshire Posts: 247 |
Interesting on warranty direct. I pay £80 a month to cover a hellva lot including the LPG (Bar the conversion itself). Wear and tear, 30k a year if needed and loads more. Plus no contribution towards parts, which is huge if you read the small print. Used to have: 2005 FFRR 4.4 Vogue - BRC LPG Conversion & Remapped Now have: 2008 SSRR 3.6 TDV8 - HSE and plenty of toys |
||
27th Sep 2011 7:08am |
|
rads Member Since: 04 Sep 2011 Location: Herts Posts: 157 |
Yes Arun were recommending flash lube, either electronic or manual. It does seem that the early electronic system picked up a bad reputation for reliability, but has now improved significantly, and I think that is the way I will go.
|
||
27th Sep 2011 7:55am |
|
dannyp15 Member Since: 21 Sep 2011 Location: essex Posts: 244 |
i bought mine already converted to lpg/petrol and im over the moon with it apart from filling it up every 250 miles but in saves me money so cant be bad and when you fill it up and your looking at 77p litre it is even better and puts a smile on my face |
||
27th Sep 2011 8:08am |
|
bozmandb9 Member Since: 06 Dec 2010 Location: Wallingford, Oxfordshire Posts: 1020 |
No worries, Flashlube electronic lubrication systems did have a poor reputation for reliability, but I've not heard of any problems with the BRC electronic lubrication system, which I believe to be higher quality! Also you need the BRC one for the warranty on the BRC system to be valid, they don't like you using other people's products for obvious reasons. Range Rover-less at the moment - Pining! |
||
27th Sep 2011 8:16am |
|
rads Member Since: 04 Sep 2011 Location: Herts Posts: 157 |
I have been wondering is the bigger (102l ?) tank would fit? I think it is 30mm taller than the more usual 94 (ish) litre tank. The 94l tank fitted into the wheel well of a p38, and the well on a L322 just seems bigger.
|
||
27th Sep 2011 8:23am |
|
bozmandb9 Member Since: 06 Dec 2010 Location: Wallingford, Oxfordshire Posts: 1020 |
To get the larger tank in you need to lift the boot floor, so probably not a great idea! Range Rover-less at the moment - Pining! |
||
27th Sep 2011 9:09am |
|
rads Member Since: 04 Sep 2011 Location: Herts Posts: 157 |
Not interested in lifting the boot floor, guess that is out.
|
||
27th Sep 2011 9:55am |
|
kingpleb Member Since: 07 Jun 2011 Location: Maybe here. Maybe there, I get everywhere! Posts: 8455 |
Why cant you get some smaller cylinder type tanks, as skinny as the underslung ones used on a fair few 4x4's and then just have about 5 of them width ways in the boot connected together to get the full use of the space? Not sure they make them that small but it cant be that hard and you could surely then break 110 of combined storage if not more? |
||
27th Sep 2011 11:47am |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis