Home > General > range rover for short milage |
|
|
Pawl Member Since: 07 Nov 2017 Location: West Midlands Posts: 689 |
Fuel consumption on a tdv8 during the first few miles is appalling - until the engine warms up.
|
||
11th Nov 2020 9:57am |
|
Jayk69 Member Since: 08 Feb 2018 Location: Daventry Posts: 601 |
modern diesel do not like short runs and 3 miles is not really enough to get everything up to temp. Unless you intend to take a long trip home in the evening and with the TDV8 4.4 can be fun as for a big heavy car the do move well.
|
||
11th Nov 2020 10:29am |
|
mjdronfield Member Since: 04 Nov 2011 Location: Derbyshire Posts: 7793 |
I’m a little surprised the old 4.4 is that bad getting to 30. I’ve been in a couple and they didn’t seem too bad. That said, I suppose it’s all relative.
|
||
11th Nov 2020 11:26am |
|
stan Site Moderator Member Since: 13 Jul 2010 Location: a moderate moderated moderator moderating moderately in moderation Posts: 35274 |
with those small miles i'd be looking at a 4.2 SC....excellent engines that hardly have any problems.. ... - .- -.
|
||
11th Nov 2020 11:37am |
|
DrRob Member Since: 16 Apr 2015 Location: Petersfield, Hampshire Posts: 4302 |
4.2 SC. No contest. Avoid a diesel. Gone to a good home: 2011 4.4 TDV8 Vogue SE Buckingham Blue with Ivory and clear glass = "Rory"
|
||
11th Nov 2020 12:34pm |
|
Alistair Member Since: 11 Feb 2011 Location: Peterborough / Bordeaux / Andorra Posts: 7925 |
Petrol every time - don't even consider diesel for low mileages - more trouble than its worth |
||
11th Nov 2020 12:40pm |
|
Pikey Member Since: 11 Nov 2020 Location: Cheltenham Posts: 39 |
The feeling of speed is definitely reduced due to being so high up, compared to a normal car.
|
||
11th Nov 2020 1:01pm |
|
Martin2 Member Since: 15 Jun 2020 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 766 |
The SDV8 is lot slower than I'm used to, but is plenty quick enough for a Range Rover and suits the way it likes to be driven.
|
||
11th Nov 2020 1:18pm |
|
rainking Member Since: 14 Jan 2019 Location: Buckingham Posts: 65 |
We have a 5.0 SC and my partner uses it for her commute (7 miles of 'B' road each way)
|
||
11th Nov 2020 1:41pm |
|
supershuttle Member Since: 20 Mar 2011 Location: Lancashire Posts: 3779 |
I would tend towards petrol, even though I now have a diesel (and it is trouble free) I always buy SWMBO a petrol car as she only does short runs and I believe that's where petrol scores..
|
||
11th Nov 2020 2:05pm |
|
Martin2 Member Since: 15 Jun 2020 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 766 |
We've never had a diesel as a second car and I had a couple of years in a V8 petrol before going back to diesel with the FF.
|
||
11th Nov 2020 2:22pm |
|
Woofster Member Since: 12 Jul 2018 Location: Toronto Posts: 121 |
I would highly suggest having a battery charger or keeping a portable booster pack in the vehicle if you are only going to be taking these vehicles on short trips. 2010 RR SC
|
||
11th Nov 2020 2:55pm |
|
mcgee9t2 Member Since: 11 Nov 2020 Location: darlington Posts: 2 |
thanks for the replies.
|
||
11th Nov 2020 3:20pm |
|
fanders Member Since: 10 Jul 2013 Location: Hants, UK Posts: 313 |
I've had a remapped 3.6 TDV8 and now a 4.2 Supercharged petrol - both really nice cars, the TDV8 had masses of torque which the supercharged doesn't have, so went better. The SC is very relaxing to drive and makes a lovely whine when you boot it, at the cost of fuel consumption in the 12-15mpg range apart from on runs. But, that's fine for me as I'm doing about 4,000 miles a year in it and being the Jag 4.2 petrol engine, it is fairly bulletproof on reliability. My TDV8 did lunch a turbo which caused its demise last year, but it had done 172,000 miles on the original turbos so can't really complain too much.
|
||
11th Nov 2020 3:41pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis