Advertise on fullfatrr.com »

Home > Photos, Videos & Media > P400e 2018 onwards review
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 1
Print this entire topic · 
Andy B



Member Since: 03 Apr 2012
Location: West Malling
Posts: 1223

England 
P400e 2018 onwards review

Apologies if this has been posted before, but here is a really comprehensive review of the L405 :-



You need an hour to watch though! Shocked SDV8 AB MY 2019
SDV8 VSE MY 2015 - Gone
5.0 S/C AB MY 2010 - Gone
4.2 S/C VSE MY 2006 - Gone

Post #540221 11th Jan 2020 4:23pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Cam-Tech-Craig



Member Since: 03 Aug 2011
Location: Gloucestershire
Posts: 16286

England 2015 Range Rover SVAutobiography SDV8 Loire Blue

Blooming heck he's, i mean the presenter is very very well informed! Shocked

Post #540273 11th Jan 2020 11:32pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Andy B



Member Since: 03 Apr 2012
Location: West Malling
Posts: 1223

England 

That's what I thought Craig, he is Mr Statistics! Shocked Very Happy SDV8 AB MY 2019
SDV8 VSE MY 2015 - Gone
5.0 S/C AB MY 2010 - Gone
4.2 S/C VSE MY 2006 - Gone

Post #540297 12th Jan 2020 10:24am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Huwrhys



Member Since: 07 Feb 2018
Location: Hornchurch
Posts: 548

United Kingdom 2017 Range Rover Autobiography SDV8 Loire Blue

I thought he came over very well and reminded me a bit of Larry Lamb. There were a couple of errors regards the images for the Lazer Pixel lights being the Xenons etc but he was without any question completely encyclopedic. It was generally brochure interpretation but very well delivered. The honest appraisal of 25mpg for the P400e makes the SDV8 seem to be the cheaper option regards running costs until Boris goes full out diesel bashing. You have to ask where they think all this environmental pish is going. The strategy is so screwed considering you won't be able to buy a petrol, diesel or hybrid in 15 years time. None of the manufacturers have come up with anything close to comparable to diesel/petrol. Tesler who kicked this off (if you discount the G-Wizz) only boast 300 miles before you need to take a 3 hour break to refuel. Not very good if you tow anything like a caravan or heavy trailer. Reduced mileage and nowhere to recharge. It's all so poorly thought out that I can see the internal combustion engine lasting a whole lot longer. As for keeping classic cars, that's another story!

Post #543723 12th Feb 2020 11:24am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
PaulTyrer



Member Since: 22 Jul 2013
Location: Devizes, Wiltshire
Posts: 1253

United Kingdom 2006 Range Rover Supercharged 4.2 SC V8 Cairns Blue

There was a panorama program on a week or two back about 'smart' motorways.

Following on from that I read that electric cars may not be able to use smart motorways as if they break down (or run out of charge) they cannot be flat towed more than 800 metres and some cannot be flat towed at all. This is according to AA boss Edmund King.

He also said that in autonomous cars if the driver falls asleep the car is supposed to pull over onto a refuge area which would be impossible on smart motorways which have few refuge areas.

I suppose the solution would be to expand the Smart motorways with a hard shoulder.........

Post #543724 12th Feb 2020 11:58am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
stan
Site Moderator


Member Since: 13 Jul 2010
Location: a moderate moderated moderator moderating moderately in moderation
Posts: 35312

United Kingdom 

..or the most obvious and less costly solution would be to have more refuge areas... ... - .- -.




Y. O. L. O.
.

Post #543725 12th Feb 2020 12:13pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Huwrhys



Member Since: 07 Feb 2018
Location: Hornchurch
Posts: 548

United Kingdom 2017 Range Rover Autobiography SDV8 Loire Blue

Ar5e and elbow differential seems to be the issue. There are, as ever loads of experts who have no idea what they’re talking about but have gone ahead and made grand sweeping statements which are backed up by the best fairy dust our money can buy. I don’t normally watch the news or so called informative programmes as I feel they include so much spin you end up questioning the hidden agenda they’re trying to brainwash you with. Dare I say”fake news”!
When scientists are asking for the raw data regarding the so called environmental issues and can only get adjusted info, you have to suspect someone is on a right good little earner. Don’t trust them, they’re not doing it for you, only themselves. Censored
Anyway, not winding myself up any more over all this twaddle.

Post #543726 12th Feb 2020 12:18pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
fullfatrr.com RSS Feed - All Forums


Switch to Mobile site