Home > General > 4.4 or the Supercharged? |
|
|
Bellini Member Since: 11 Jan 2012 Location: Berkshire Posts: 2261 |
Having started with a 2002 4.4 and then changing to the SC (nearly 6 years ownership of the latter), I’d say the SC in every respect.
|
||
17th Feb 2019 6:00pm |
|
AutoBiL322 Member Since: 10 Feb 2019 Location: Bath Posts: 42 |
Thank you, much appreciated! |
||
17th Feb 2019 9:02pm |
|
MPx Member Since: 29 Jul 2011 Location: South Somerset Posts: 583 |
I agree. My BM 4.4 was my first Fattie and a bit of a nightmare reliability wise but otherwise demonstrated how great these cars are. But for me the 4.2 SC was in a different league and "as standard" in 2007 was an AB that came with all of the toys, a huge increase in urge and mine was bulletproof in the 5 years/60k miles I had it. The 5.0 SC is better again, but the step up is less and there's a couple of things that don't suit me quite as well (no dip stick ffs - and ACC!)... and a couple of niggles with reliability (deplorable steps anyone?). They're all mighty fine cars though and very happy with my choice with no desire to move away from the marque. Mike - MPx
|
||
17th Feb 2019 10:55pm |
|
AutoBiL322 Member Since: 10 Feb 2019 Location: Bath Posts: 42 |
Thank you...
|
||
17th Feb 2019 11:09pm |
|
AutoBiL322 Member Since: 10 Feb 2019 Location: Bath Posts: 42 |
I ended up buying another 4.4 but this time a 2006 in Java Black.
|
||
22nd Feb 2019 10:17pm |
|
Full Fattie Member Since: 10 Aug 2018 Location: Sunderland Posts: 245 |
Can’t think of anything worse than sitting on an erection |
||
25th Feb 2019 8:08am |
|
AutoBiL322 Member Since: 10 Feb 2019 Location: Bath Posts: 42 |
I share your concern! Not my cup of tea either |
||
25th Feb 2019 8:21am |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis