Home > Off Topic > Diesel Scrappage Scheme proposed - we're under siege |
|
|
mzplcg Member Since: 26 May 2010 Location: Warwickshire. England. The Commonwealth. Posts: 4029 |
Hydrogen is about as clean an option as Electric. The pollution simply moves from the tailpipe to the fuel production facility. Combine that with the dangers of highly compressed, volatile gas in a vessel which could collide with many other things and the risks simply don't stack up in favour of it. The actual manufacture of hydrogen gas is seriously inefficient as well, much less than using petrol in an IC engine even. You should also look at exactly how hydrogen is made as well. Basically it is mostly extracted (atomically separated) from carbon rich materials to which is is bound which releases more carbon into the atmosphere. Isn't that the same carbon as we're constantly being told is melting the polar ice caps? As for a scrappage scheme it won't happen anytime soon. Certainly not under a Conservative government. Just look how many Tory voters (middle England) run diesel cars, from the Big saloons right down to the wife's runabout. I've looked up and down the lane where we live today (Dog walking) and every car except my wife's Jag XFR is a diesel. 11 diesels, 1 petrol. And the thing is, nobody gives a s.h.i.t. This all comes down to running cost. Diesel gives more MPG. Even the tree hugging fraternity who claim they want to buy a "green" car are looking at the cost of road tax and fuel if they are honest. There are plenty in government who well know this and won't rock that particular boat. They might pay it some lip service to be seen to be sympathetic to the cause, but the reality is it will only ever be lip service. |
||
4th Feb 2017 10:07pm |
|
Mikey Member Since: 10 Jan 2008 Location: Dundee Posts: 1764 |
£8.5k
|
||
4th Feb 2017 11:05pm |
|
Robert Member Since: 25 Oct 2011 Location: Perigueux Posts: 2289 |
The whole story with small diesels came from France. When they decided to go heavily into nuclear energy with the EDF (partly state owned then) Their big oil companies (partly state owned) were affraid of loosing the diesel sales. So the idiots in gouvernement launched the idea of diesel for everyone... That market boomed, small diesels were sold with a state premium (paid out of the vat income)
|
||
5th Feb 2017 10:19am |
|
87RJD Member Since: 01 Dec 2013 Location: Wokingham Posts: 103 |
Hi, lorries and buses are also being targeted, have a look at one show Monday evening, at a feature on what Waitrose have been doing with gas trucks and double deck trailers to reduce pollution SC 4.2, 2012 face lifted, 25K miles, 1 previous owner Triumph TR6 1973 Triumph Bonneville 1970 Previous: 2002 TD6 Merc SL500 Escort RS Cosworth RR 3.9 Vogue 4.2 E type Jag replica (challenger) Escort RS2000 (many) Escort RS 1600 Turbo |
||
5th Feb 2017 11:25am |
|
Flashman Member Since: 05 Jun 2011 Location: Windsor & Brentwood Posts: 1228 |
Sure but electric currently requires massive battery packs which are terrible for the environment, have limited lifespan and are very heavy. I am sure engineers can design an accident proof container that is safe for cars like the LPG tanks but stronger. As to the production efficiency, you can make hydrogen when during off peak hours and create it using solar, wind, hydro or tidal power taking up the excess production so not wasting it. I am sure it will also get more efficient as time goes on as with any product. It only needs water as an input so not really that polluting. It might end up being a mixture of the two, electric motors on the car with a hydrogen fuel cell converting the gas to power as and when needed. The key is to make the technology environmentally friendly not just the fuel. Tom Current Drive 2011 4.4 TDV8 Autobiography - Santorini Black - Ivory Leather Previous Drives 2004 Model Vogue Td6 (Touchscreen) - Java Black - Parchment Leather 1994 RR Classic 3.9 V8 Soft dash - Niagara Grey - Grey Leather 1972 Series III SWB Safari - Green (Hand Painted) - Black Plastic |
||
6th Feb 2017 10:53am |
|
mzplcg Member Since: 26 May 2010 Location: Warwickshire. England. The Commonwealth. Posts: 4029 |
Maybe, but most hydrogen is produced by separating it from a carbon based product such as Methane (CH4). Using water to make Hydrogen is hugely inefficient, kind of like nuclear fusion. Needs way more energy to make it than it actually produces.
|
||
6th Feb 2017 12:14pm |
|
p38arover Member Since: 16 Dec 2015 Location: Western Sydney Posts: 1534 |
Re solar panels, my experience is that clouds kill production. I have 3kW system (16 panels) which has generated 22MWh of electricity in the past 6.5 years - and we get a lot of sun.
|
||
6th Feb 2017 12:49pm |
|
RR2008HSE Member Since: 06 Jan 2013 Location: British Columbia Posts: 2932 |
There are many good things about hydrogen, but a little H2 sitting around won't get you very far. Hydrogen must be cooled and compressed in order to get the energy density needed in a car. That extra packaging energy is the biggest mark against H2. If you have a LOT of free energy around, storing it as H2 can have its advantages, but if you are grabbing H's off methane and driving the reaction with coal fired power, then 'no'. |
||
7th Feb 2017 7:30pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis