Home > General > RRS vs FFRR |
|
|
kin Member Since: 20 Nov 2008 Location: rainy city Posts: 348 |
Heres a thread from our sister's site...
|
||
19th Jan 2009 6:25pm |
|
speedymarktd6 Member Since: 20 Nov 2008 Location: Worcestershire Posts: 727 |
i love my FFRR its the best multi purpose vehicle ive owned and i think every one should have a range rover just for the smile on your face factor and its also the cheapest to run ive owned onto no6 Range Rover
|
||
19th Jan 2009 6:43pm |
|
JOKER Member Since: 11 Sep 2008 Location: Sconnie Botland Posts: 15876 |
|
||
20th Jan 2009 7:01pm |
|
Vogue Member Since: 31 Jan 2008 Location: on the hill Posts: 3739 |
absolutely, nice to see a well educated man |
||
21st Jan 2009 9:49am |
|
DiscoStu Member Since: 04 Aug 2007 Location: Visiting from Disco3 Posts: 35 |
I think you need to remove the SPACE comment - that's for the Discovery |
||
21st Jan 2009 10:01am |
|
Vogue Member Since: 31 Jan 2008 Location: on the hill Posts: 3739 |
no |
||
21st Jan 2009 11:49am |
|
Vogue Member Since: 31 Jan 2008 Location: on the hill Posts: 3739 |
Stu, not being funny, but I think the Discovery 3 is more of a Range Rover than a Sporty |
||
21st Jan 2009 11:51am |
|
ken Member Since: 22 Aug 2008 Location: On another forum Posts: 936 |
Space upfront = RR
|
||
21st Jan 2009 1:30pm |
|
Vogue Member Since: 31 Jan 2008 Location: on the hill Posts: 3739 |
and thats only coss its got a slab sided arse end |
||
21st Jan 2009 3:06pm |
|
JOKER Member Since: 11 Sep 2008 Location: Sconnie Botland Posts: 15876 |
Waste of Space = RRS |
||
21st Jan 2009 3:38pm |
|
kin Member Since: 20 Nov 2008 Location: rainy city Posts: 348 |
Have to admit I rather like the D3 and would have one over the RRS, tonnes of room inside, only thing it lacks is the sense of occasions compared to FFRR |
||
21st Jan 2009 4:03pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis