Home > Off Topic - Other Cars > thinking of buyingp38 |
|
|
stan Site Moderator Member Since: 13 Jul 2010 Location: a moderate moderated moderator moderating moderately in moderation Posts: 35311 |
welcome steve, this is a dedicated L322 and L405 forum but some here have experience of the P38 and you should get some info..
|
||
11th May 2015 7:49am |
|
landybrick Member Since: 11 May 2015 Location: southwest scotland Posts: 2 |
sorry I didn't know ! I go the link for this site of a member of my defender forum . but hopefully someone can help |
||
11th May 2015 3:19pm |
|
johnboyairey Member Since: 11 Jan 2013 Location: surrey Posts: 2032 |
ive had three p38's all petrol. (and lpg) if this is your introduction to the range rover, you might want to think again. (we have had a disco2 diesel, also applies here....)
|
||
11th May 2015 4:21pm |
|
Cam-Tech-Craig Member Since: 03 Aug 2011 Location: Gloucestershire Posts: 16286 |
Not a fan anymore then |
||
11th May 2015 5:43pm |
|
vaz Member Since: 15 Jun 2014 Location: Colne, Lancashire Posts: 332 |
The diesels are not too bad if you have them re-mapped to around 155bhp. Certainly a better engine than the petrol variants including those with an lpg conversion. If converted to lpg, make sure it is a multipoint setup as the single point venturi is pants, check for an after market air filter as the venturi setup will cause backfires and blow the standard air filter box to bits.
|
||
11th May 2015 8:00pm |
|
dhallworth Member Since: 10 Oct 2011 Location: Glasgow Posts: 3090 |
Vaz,
|
||
11th May 2015 11:03pm |
|
CS Member Since: 14 Apr 2015 Location: Edinburgh Posts: 1378 |
I had a P38 Vogue 4.6 between 2000 (bought new) and 2004. It was perhaps too new to develop many faults, but did upset me by sticking in low ratio when I was in heavy traffic with a trailer. It was very comfortable (I think the seats are better than in the 322) and when I changed to the 4.4 322 in 2004 I thought the P38 handled better. Apart from the seats, the 322 cabin is more elegant and the 322 has better performance. Off road the P38 chassis limits ground clearance, and I regularly caught the towbar plate on the ground. JLR have said that their Heritage division will support the P38 with spares etc. so perhaps sorting them out would be easier now. My 322s have had numerous faults too. All of that said, when my last 322 engine failed I considered a P38 as a stopgap until I could get a 405 but decided against and got the best 322 I could find instead. One sees few P38s on the road nowadays and very few of the ones one does see have petrol engines - there will be a good reason for that. Only Range Rovers since 1988 |
||
12th May 2015 12:33pm |
|
ajac8 Member Since: 04 Oct 2011 Location: Shakespeares County Posts: 1653 |
I understand the 2.5 diesel can't put the skin off a rice pudding but as you say HSE I'm assuming the 4.6. I had a 4.6 for around three years. The blend motors went, the central locking ceased the drivers door closed (fixed from inside and a total PITA) but that was it. Expect the blend motors to go but if you are lucky they have already been replaced. expect electrical gremlins a plenty. That said I would have another one. I enjoyed the comfort and its no slouch either.
|
||
12th May 2015 7:51pm |
|
362bkr Member Since: 15 Oct 2014 Location: Devon Posts: 679 |
Over the years i owned three P38s and were reasonably trouble free. The 1st was a 4.0 lpg and the only trouble was with the lpg system . The 2nd and 3rd were 2.5 diesel and the blend motors went on one of them and the suspension compressor on the other and that was about it . i would describe the diesel performance as adequate and they can easily be chipped if required . Would i have another as a runaround ? ...............yes i would. |
||
12th May 2015 8:12pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis