Home > General > 3.6 vs 4.4 |
|
|
Philip Member Since: 05 Jan 2010 Location: UK Posts: 2564 |
4.4, by some margin. Faster, quieter, more economical, and all of them have the sharper drive and better refinement of the 2010 face lift. |
||
29th Jan 2015 1:50am |
|
Philip Member Since: 05 Jan 2010 Location: UK Posts: 2564 |
Double post, stupid phone |
||
29th Jan 2015 1:50am |
|
Scottyav Member Since: 11 Feb 2013 Location: Cannock Staffordshire Posts: 1204 |
Ask Craig about t between his new one and old silver flyer 😜😜 |
||
29th Jan 2015 7:17am |
|
verydisco Member Since: 10 Dec 2009 Location: UK/US Posts: 2952 |
Already debated, please check using the SEARCH icon.
|
||
29th Jan 2015 8:35am |
|
Cam-Tech-Craig Member Since: 03 Aug 2011 Location: Gloucestershire Posts: 16284 |
Obviously everyone who have owned both will say the latter as its progression!
|
||
29th Jan 2015 9:22am |
|
verydisco Member Since: 10 Dec 2009 Location: UK/US Posts: 2952 |
I meant to mention this indeed. I think the 4.4L is 30% better overall BUT, today, the 3.6L is quite a better value for money
|
||
29th Jan 2015 9:42am |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis