Advertise on fullfatrr.com »

Home > General > Man maths help required to change or not???
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 2 12>
Print this entire topic · 
Sandyt



Member Since: 07 Nov 2013
Location: Wraysbury Windsor
Posts: 2265

United Kingdom 2007 Range Rover Supercharged 4.2 SC V8 Buckingham Blue
Man maths help required to change or not???

Right gents help / advice required
My predicament is that my ff is a july 2007 4.2 s/c which O bought last November on 84k miles for £14k with two months Landrover Warranty. I replaced the warranty in Feb and have had it serviced and Motd at the main dealer.There are no faults showing at all and the paint work was clay barred prior to my buying it and is immaculate as are both sets of wheels. The previous owner replaced the side lights with leds upgraded the tv and phone system so all is good.
I had a new gearbox fitted by landrover courtesy of the warranty it is a great colour for me Buck Blue with cream interior.
BUT it has the 4.2 not the 5 .0 engine so there is the dilemma I am not that bothered about grilles or side vents etc and do about 20 to 25k a year but 5.0 are a reasonable additional cost SO do I change and risk getting something with problems but have the performance or stick with the one I have and upgrade supercharger pulley and remap????

Post #279158 5th Sep 2014 7:55am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
stan
Site Moderator


Member Since: 13 Jul 2010
Location: a moderate moderated moderator moderating moderately in moderation
Posts: 35332

United Kingdom 

i'm in a similar dilemma where i considered changing from my 2009my 4.2 to a 5.0 but the difference in cost is to much for me to justify it...i havnt driven a 5.0 but mine is sublime with enough power when you need it and a comfortable drive..
those with 5.0's say its a fantastic piece of engineering but so is the 4.2 and where and when would you use that extra 0.8 litres of power on our UK roads with all these speed restrictions,traffic and speed cameras etc... ... - .- -.




Y. O. L. O.
.

Post #279161 5th Sep 2014 8:06am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Sandyt



Member Since: 07 Nov 2013
Location: Wraysbury Windsor
Posts: 2265

United Kingdom 2007 Range Rover Supercharged 4.2 SC V8 Buckingham Blue

Totally understand Stan its a real dilemma and for me the fact that mine was so well looked after and immaculate condition makes it even more difficult and I was surprised at the price differential its almost double Sad

Post #279162 5th Sep 2014 8:09am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Robert



Member Since: 25 Oct 2011
Location: Perigueux
Posts: 2289

France 2007 Range Rover Vogue 4.4 V8 Zambezi Silver

Oh come on, you are only looking for enough positive comments on the 5.0 to justify your new toy.
If you want it that much, buy it and try to buy it on the same conditions as you bought your SC.
BUT... Cool why?
Is it status, because of the neighbours, to moan all over it in the pub, to show off on the parking at work
Or because you think you will often need that extra power?
If it is just a wannahave and you have the sparecash, go for it.

Post #279164 5th Sep 2014 8:16am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
GraemeC



Member Since: 01 Jul 2012
Location: Chester
Posts: 836

United Kingdom 2007 Range Rover Vogue SE TDV8 Zermatt Silver

20-25k miles pa = 4.4 TDV8 Rolling with laughter 2007 Zermatt Silver TDV8 Vogue SE - now sold but was a great car!

Post #279171 5th Sep 2014 9:08am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
supershuttle



Member Since: 20 Mar 2011
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 3813

England 2013 Range Rover Autobiography SDV8 Luxor

Yep - do it because you want to, no other reason, thinking or man maths is required Very Happy Geoff

Post #279172 5th Sep 2014 9:11am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Bellini



Member Since: 11 Jan 2012
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 2261

United Kingdom 2007 Range Rover Supercharged 4.2 SC V8 Zermatt Silver

I've not driven a 5,0 and, like many 4.2 owners, suffer the same dilemma.

My yearly mileage, currently, is the same as yours.

However, mine enjoys the pulley and remap upgrade and is appreciably quicker as a result. I can imagine a 5.0 being quicker still, but I also gather these lose a little of the aural burble that the 4.2 achieves so well. And I listen to the burble a lot. I rarely use the stereo.

The 5.0 offers, in my eyes, a better instrument / entertainment package and a moderately quicker powertrain with a notched improvement in fuel consumption. Like you, I really cannot justify the additional cost.

Even allowing for a 'significant' bill for potential repairs to failed components on a 4.2, it's hard to justify. A £5k bill is still considerably less than the cost to change.

I'd need to be in the right place (a dealer) in the right mood with the time from an encouraging salesperson to take a drive before I'd consider one. And even then, it'd have to be the 'right' deal.

If you want one, buy one. Don't analyse it. Do it. If you're at all unsure, step away. If you want to be convinced, drive one. Si. <This is my name.

I eat rat poison.

A man ain't truly been insulted until he stands buck naked in front of a woman and she didn't even notice. Or care.

Post #279175 5th Sep 2014 9:35am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
RRUK
Site Supporter


Member Since: 08 Jun 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 6370

United Kingdom 2019 Range Rover Vogue SE SDV8 Santorini Black

So, speaking from experience of having had the 3.0 TD6, 3.6 TDV8, 4.2 SC and 5.0 SC (as well as having driven the 4.4TDV8, 3.0 TDV6, 2.7 TDV6, 3.0 SDV6 yadda yadda) I can categorically say that the 5.0 is like nothing else.

Last night I popped to my local town to grab fish n chips, it was a balmy evening, I had some windows down, and the sound of the 5.0 as you give it a short stab, it's just SO good, and it goes so well.

Have you ever seen this 4.2 vs 5.0 comparison video 0-100-0mph (albeit on the RRS)??

The difference is astonishing.

 Discovery 4 HSE
1998 110 TUM HS FFR Hard Top XD WOLF
1982 Series 3 Hard Top

*Gone:L462 D5 HSE LUX, L663 Defender 110 HSE, Discovery 3 HSE, 2014MY Range Rover Sport 5.0 Supercharged AB Dynamic; L405 Exec Vogue SE 4.4, 5.0 Supercharged Autobiography, Defender TDCi XS CSW, Defender TD5 HT, Vogue SE TDV8, Vogue TD6, RRSport SC 4.2V8, Classic 3.9 Vogue Auto, Land Rover Series 3 SWB

Post #279178 5th Sep 2014 9:45am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
jambo27



Member Since: 03 Dec 2013
Location: Staffordshire
Posts: 125

United Kingdom 2007 Range Rover Vogue SE TDV8 Java Black

Apologies for slightly off topic ...

What kind of performace upgrade can you get from new pulley and remap ? and what are roughly the associated costs ?

I also have a 4.2SC and find it fast but like everyone I wonder about some more power.

Cheers 2008 TDV8

Post #279179 5th Sep 2014 9:47am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Haylands



Member Since: 04 Mar 2014
Location: East Yorkshire
Posts: 8246

England 2014 Range Rover Autobiography SDV8 Loire Blue

You're not here for a long time, you're here for a good time..... BUY IT..... Pete
__________________________________________________
2014 L405 Autobiography SDV8 4.4 Loire Blue Ebony interior
2011 L322 Vogue SE 4.4 TDV8 Baltic Blue. Parchment over Navy Interior. Sold
2012 L322 Autobiography 5.0 Supercharged Ipanema Sand, Jet Interior. Sold
2002 L322 Vogue 4.4 V8 Epson Green, Ivory over Aspen Interior (Fatty Offroader) Sold
-Click for Project Fatty off roader-

Post #279180 5th Sep 2014 9:51am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
vnitos



Member Since: 18 Nov 2010
Location: pretoria
Posts: 390

South Africa 2016 Range Rover SVAutobiography 5.0 SC V8 Baltic Blue

@Sandyt: if you get a good deal, JUST DO IT! I can kick myself for not taking a deal that I was offered on a 2011 5.0SC albeit with 119000kms, but FSH.

Thus far I could not get anything close to that deal and has resorted to keep my 4.2SC for another year or so. In the meantime I'm adding a 6% SC upper pulley (waiting for it to arrive from UK), removed cats, and remap - hopefully getting close to 350kW.

Noise in the 5.0SC is totally different from the 4.2SC - 5.0 baritone whilst 4.2 more supercharger whine when you push it.

Post #279182 5th Sep 2014 9:54am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
vnitos



Member Since: 18 Nov 2010
Location: pretoria
Posts: 390

South Africa 2016 Range Rover SVAutobiography 5.0 SC V8 Baltic Blue

Btw just think what SC pulley and remap will do to the 5.0SC - oo la la Mr. Green Twisted Evil Mr. Green

Post #279183 5th Sep 2014 9:56am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
vnitos



Member Since: 18 Nov 2010
Location: pretoria
Posts: 390

South Africa 2016 Range Rover SVAutobiography 5.0 SC V8 Baltic Blue

@jambo27 - read this: http://www.fullfatrr.com/forum/topic14188....ger+pulley

Post #279185 5th Sep 2014 9:58am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
pld118



Member Since: 25 Mar 2013
Location: Bairns
Posts: 4218

Scotland 2014 Range Rover Vogue SDV6 Santorini Black

Sandy,

You raised the 'maths' point as a headline within this post.

1. If you would need to pay the same again, plus your 4.2SC for a 5.0, would that be getting you a 5.0 with similar mileage to your 4.2, which is an immaculate car that you know, that you've not had too long and reference which you can extend the LR warranty for £800 odd, without breakdown cover (a warranty that has so far served you well, e.g recent new gearbox)?

2. I understand that several hundred pounds can get the pulley/ performance upgrade done on the 4.2SC?

3. The 2010MY exterior conversion can be done professionally for in the region of between £3 and £4k?

4. If my understanding and arithmetic are correct re points 1 to 3, then for approx £5k as opposed to £14k, that's a fully fettled, warrantied, immaculate, FSH, completely upgraded 4.2SC (less the infotainment system) that should have enough power and charm to satisfy many people; and I've also interpreted from reading posts from seasoned professionals like Gary Elliot and CTC, that whilst people perhaps shouldn't commission the 2010MY conversion as 'an investment', there are good examples of people having pretty much got their conversion money back come resale time, if not that, then they are desirable to sell on.

Just some thoughts and questions specifically reference the 'man maths' aspect of your OP.

If the 5.0 is 'pulling' you though, apparently you won't be able to stop Wink Laughing

Thumbs Up

Post #279190 5th Sep 2014 10:59am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Gazellio @ Prestige Cars



Member Since: 22 Jan 2010
Location: Chilterns, UK
Posts: 11309

United Kingdom 2010 Range Rover SE Td6 Zermatt Silver

supershuttle wrote:
Yep - do it because you want to, no other reason, thinking or man maths is required Very Happy


Change your car avatar..... Thumbs Up

Post #279192 5th Sep 2014 11:03am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 2 12>
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
fullfatrr.com RSS Feed - All Forums


Switch to Mobile site