Home > General > Obscure Thoughts |
|
|
tymh Member Since: 21 Apr 2014 Location: Garstang Posts: 312 |
after spotting this I got to thinking...
|
||
10th May 2014 7:38pm |
|
mjdronfield Member Since: 04 Nov 2011 Location: Derbyshire Posts: 7803 |
I think you are right - to a point, but have a read of a related discussion, and the resulting "can of worms"...,,,,,
|
||
10th May 2014 7:48pm |
|
tymh Member Since: 21 Apr 2014 Location: Garstang Posts: 312 |
That will teach me about not reading an entire forum before posting
|
||
10th May 2014 7:56pm |
|
CSK Member Since: 15 Oct 2010 Location: St Tropez Posts: 750 |
Why not call the Evoque "Freelander Sport", the Sport "Discovery Sport" and the proper Range Rover just "Range Rover"? |
||
10th May 2014 9:36pm |
|
mjdronfield Member Since: 04 Nov 2011 Location: Derbyshire Posts: 7803 |
I understand the Evoque was changed to Range Rover at the very last minute as a marketing ploy to gain from the rr's popularity.
|
||
10th May 2014 9:44pm |
|
RR2008HSE Member Since: 06 Jan 2013 Location: British Columbia Posts: 2932 |
Yes! Discovery owners are now going to have the same problem. I wonder what their solution with be. Pretty soon, "Range Rover" and "Discovery" are going to provide as much info as, "I drive a Toyota," which covers everything from the Corolla to the Land Cruiser and LFA. |
||
10th May 2014 10:02pm |
|
mzplcg Member Since: 26 May 2010 Location: Warwickshire. England. The Commonwealth. Posts: 4029 |
There was a plan to separate the brands at one point, a bit like when RR Classic was launched you had the choice of Series 2A for utilitarian or RR Classic for a more luxurious version. That was it back then, Poverty Spec or Posh Spec.
|
||
11th May 2014 8:12am |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis