^^^ Nothing secret mate, the project has come to an halt as I have been abroad so much.
I have been all over the place BUT in my Rangie! (Had quite some fun with the 405 and the 494 off road though... )

I will be home more thant 7 days from September-on, so will see then  l=Oo\________/oO=l l:OolΞΞΞΞΞΞΞloO:l

Current
RANGE ROVER Vogue 4.4L SDV8 - 2013 - Indus Silver, on Almond.
RANGE ROVER Vogue 4.4L V8 - 2002 - ex-2003 G4 Challenge Event Vehicle, Stage 3: Australia
RANGE ROVER HSE 4.4L V8 - 2004 - one-of-one Overfinch
RANGE ROVER P38a 4.0L V8 - 1999 - ex-2000 TReK Event Vehicle: South Africa

Previous:
RANGE ROVER Vogue 4.4L TDV8 - 2012 - RANGE ROVER 3.6L TDV8 x3 - RANGE ROVER Td6 x1 - RANGE ROVER Classic 3.5L V8 x1

Going back to comments about the doors being too long without the gills, I honestly believe it's more a case of the bonnet being too short. Si. <This is my name.

I eat rat poison.

A man ain't truly been insulted until he stands buck naked in front of a woman and she didn't even notice. Or care.

I think it needs the door gills, but not those silly hocky-stick lamps 2021 L405 Vogue SE 4.4 V8 DIESEL ~ #17

Nice work. I like it, but I think I like the original more.

When you removed the 'door gills,' you left the funny bit of trim that takes the line of the gills to the back of the car. I don't think it can stay without the gills.

mindreader... was thinking of doing something similar! I think the lights front and rear need a bit of a rake at the back to make them work, just not the silly flicks. Think the previous gen Grand Cherokee for an idea of what I mean. I think the gills are necessary though. No matter what happens this will go down with the P38 as a 'not quite' generation car. The wheelarches have too much of a flare on, and the roofline is too raked back. Neither of these problems can be addressed without major production changes, so I guess we'll have to hang on for a decade!